The following Fedora 25 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
209 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d79ba708cb
exim-4.87.1-1.fc25
108 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e2d17af41e
python-XStatic-jquery-ui-1.12.0.1-4.fc25
47 https://bodhi.fedoraproj
The following Fedora 24 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
216 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-26f9817b08
squid-3.5.23-1.fc24
209 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-eaaa9c4a08
exim-4.87.1-1.fc24
172 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDOR
Missing expected images:
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 16/137 (x86_64), 3/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170723.n.0):
ID: 123796 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted
URL: https://openqa.fedorapro
Hey All,
First of all , I would like to thank all those who have shown interest
in testing Fedora and making it better.
We saw a lot of new faces in the test day(s) and introduction emails to welcome
you all,
here's is what we have for you.
We are going to have an onboarding call,
We will foc
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 11:03:34AM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> However, I think I misread your comment. I believed you're proposing we
> reject bugs existing in stable releases as blockers at any point of the
> development cycle. But you seem to have suggested we do this only if
> they're discovere
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 10:02:09AM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > But all of that above is a separate problem. What I'd like to understand
> is
> > why you think existing bugs should be treated differently from new bugs.
> > What is the rati
