Fedora 25 updates-testing report

2017-07-19 Thread updates
The following Fedora 25 Security updates need testing: Age URL 205 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d79ba708cb exim-4.87.1-1.fc25 103 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e2d17af41e python-XStatic-jquery-ui-1.12.0.1-4.fc25 47 https://bodhi.fedoraproj

Fedora 24 updates-testing report

2017-07-19 Thread updates
The following Fedora 24 Security updates need testing: Age URL 211 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-26f9817b08 squid-3.5.23-1.fc24 205 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-eaaa9c4a08 exim-4.87.1-1.fc24 167 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDOR

Fedora Rawhide-20170719.n.0 compose check report

2017-07-19 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Server boot i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 20/126 (x86_64), 1/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170718.n.0): ID: 122003 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedorapr

Re: Blocker bug process proposal: waiving late-discovered blockers to next release

2017-07-19 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:24:16PM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: > > Another consideration that might be relevant: is this a *new* issue or > > something that also affects the current release (either as released or > > with updates)? If something is a clear-cut blocker criterion violation > > but isn't

Re: Blocker bug process proposal: waiving late-discovered blockers to next release

2017-07-19 Thread Kamil Paral
The proposal sounds fine. On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > Another consideration that might be relevant: is this a *new* issue or > something that also affects the current release (either as released or > with updates)? If something is a clear-cut blocker criterion violat