On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 05:13:04PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi folks! The Fedora 26 Beta freeze is fast approaching (it's 2017-05-
> 16), so it's time for a blocker status mail.
I think
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6781
is a beta blocker too.
Jakub
___
On Fri, 2017-05-12 at 22:14 -0400, Brian Gribble wrote:
> Good evening,
>
> My name is Brian and I am a Platform Consultant at Red Hat. My current
> role is supporting a project using PKI along with other Red Hat products.
> Prior to joining Red Hat I worked as a Linux Systems Administrator using
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 10:14:23PM -0400, Brian Gribble wrote:
> Good evening,
>
> My name is Brian and I am a Platform Consultant at Red Hat. My current
> role is supporting a project using PKI along with other Red Hat products.
> Prior to joining Red Hat I worked as a Linux Systems Administrato
Good evening,
My name is Brian and I am a Platform Consultant at Red Hat. My current
role is supporting a project using PKI along with other Red Hat products.
Prior to joining Red Hat I worked as a Linux Systems Administrator using
RHEL, and some CentOS, at different companies. I have been worki
On Fri, 2017-05-12 at 04:12 -0400, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote:
> Hey Testers,
>
> We just had DNF 2.0 Test Day[1]. The test coverage was awesome and we had a
> good mix of new and old contributors.
> Thanks to all of you for participating. Also, Igor (Ignatenkobrain) for
> helping us through!
>
>
Hi folks! The Fedora 26 Beta freeze is fast approaching (it's 2017-05-
16), so it's time for a blocker status mail.
tl;dr action summary
1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448923
ACTION: Preferably, Firefox maintainer (mstransky) to fix build on ARM
2. https://b
The following Fedora 24 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
143 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-26f9817b08
squid-3.5.23-1.fc24
136 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-eaaa9c4a08
exim-4.87.1-1.fc24
99 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDOR
On 05/12/2017 06:17 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Matthew Miller
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 04:52:05PM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
Why would we dictate that Editions/Spins can't use different
>> In an extreme situation, a release could be nearly impossible due to
>> dependency cycles.
>
>You'd need to provide specific examples for "extreme" as this has not
>happened in recent Fedora history (at least back to F-21)
I cannot cite an historical example. With more than a thousand packages
The following Fedora 25 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
136 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d79ba708cb
exim-4.87.1-1.fc25
34 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e2d17af41e
python-XStatic-jquery-ui-1.12.0.1-4.fc25
15 https://bodhi.fedoraproj
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 04:52:05PM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
>> > Why would we dictate that Editions/Spins can't use different software on
>> > different architectures? It mig
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 04:52:05PM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > Why would we dictate that Editions/Spins can't use different software on
> > different architectures? It might make perfect sense to use browser X on
> > x86_64 because it's
Hey Testers,
We just had DNF 2.0 Test Day[1]. The test coverage was awesome and we had a
good mix of new and old contributors.
Thanks to all of you for participating. Also, Igor (Ignatenkobrain) for helping
us through!
Testers: 26
Coverage according to Testcase:
Basic[http://fedoraproject.or
13 matches
Mail list logo
