Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 6/110 (x86_64), 1/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 26-20170403.n.0):
ID: 76398 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproj
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 11:17:27AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> So, at the Alpha go/no-go we discussed this bug:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437299
>
> and agreed that with current behaviour of anaconda and dnf, blocking
> Alpha release on it didn't make sense.
>
> The re
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 21/107 (x86_64), 5/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170403.n.0):
ID: 76165 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/76165
ID:
Hi folks! Time for another proposal :)
We currently kinda bundle the checks for correct artwork and 'release
identification' (stuff that identifies the release, like 'Welcome to
Fedora 26!' etc.) into two test cases that also include functionality
testing:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testca
The following Fedora 26 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
20 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-8e4c14eeec
php-onelogin-php-saml-2.10.5-1.fc26
11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-68bd2a916e
python-sleekxmpp-1.3.2-1.fc26
3 https://bodhi.fedo
The following Fedora 25 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
99 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d79ba708cb
exim-4.87.1-1.fc25
19 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-06f4b88ceb
php-onelogin-php-saml-2.10.5-1.fc25
10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.o
The following Fedora 24 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
106 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-26f9817b08
squid-3.5.23-1.fc24
99 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-eaaa9c4a08
exim-4.87.1-1.fc24
61 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDOR
- Original Message -
> From: "Adam Williamson"
> To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2017 11:47:27 PM
> Subject: Criteria proposal: move "No broken packages" requirement to Final
>
> So, at the Alpha go/no-go we discussed this bug:
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 11:17:27AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> So, at the Alpha go/no-go we discussed this bug:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437299
>
> and agreed that with current behaviour of anaconda and dnf, blocking
> Alpha release on it didn't make sense.
>
> The re
- Original Message -
> From: "Dirk Gottschalk"
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2017 9:01:56 PM
> Subject: Introduction
>
> Hi,
>
> my name ist Dirk, I'm 36 years old from Aachen, Gernamy.
>
> I'm a software developer, system and network administrator and
So, at the Alpha go/no-go we discussed this bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437299
and agreed that with current behaviour of anaconda and dnf, blocking
Alpha release on it didn't make sense.
The relevant criterion here is
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Alpha_Release_
e nightly compose that just completed (20170405.n.0) syncs out to
> mirrors the problem should be resolved.
Ah - thanks, Adam! I'll wait a bit, retry it and report back.
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
signature.asc
On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 17:39 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> At the Go/No-Go meeting today, we agreed in principle that major bugs
> in virt guest functionality should come under the Alpha criteria, not
> the Beta criteria as before. When we established the virt criteria, use
> of vir
fc25.i686
> is blocking the update. It somehow creates a dependency chain that
> doesn't allow nss to update, and so the rest follows.
>
> You could try removing that package, and then running the
> system-upgrade again. Reinstall it after the system-upgrade completes
> if
Hi,
my name ist Dirk, I'm 36 years old from Aachen, Gernamy.
I'm a software developer, system and network administrator and I use
Fedora since it's first release.
Release 25 was the first release which brought me in trouble after
upgrading from Fedora 24. I could fix all issues, so everything is
On Wed, 05 Apr 2017 12:03:51 +0100
Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was looking to upgrade my machine to F26 using dnf system-upgrade. I
> got a conflict or two and was wondering if this is a known issue and
> whether it is OK to proceed?
>
> > > [asinha@cs-as14aho-2-herts-ac-uk ~]$ sudo dnf
Hello,
I was looking to upgrade my machine to F26 using dnf system-upgrade. I
got a conflict or two and was wondering if this is a known issue and
whether it is OK to proceed?
> > [asinha@cs-as14aho-2-herts-ac-uk ~]$ sudo dnf system-upgrade download
> > --releasever=26
- Original Message -
> From: "Cameron Connell"
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2017 3:18:52 AM
> Subject: Introduction: Cameron Connell
>
> Hello!
> I am a High School junior in MA with an interest in linux ever since owning a
> chromebook in 2013, and eve
18 matches
Mail list logo