The following Fedora 24 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
78 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-32eaf0c41e
redis-3.2.3-1.fc24
62 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0ef628998f
chicken-4.11.0-3.fc24
13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FED
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Yes, that was the case with the F21 syslinux bug -
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148087 - which is why it
> took us a while to catch it.
Reading that and the syslinux change log, I'm guessing it was less a
syslinux bug th
On Wed, 2016-10-26 at 11:59 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>
> > So after some further consideration I think I'm on board with this, and
> > it turned out not to be too hard to implement. I have updated the draft
> > test case:
> >
> > htt
/FEDORA-2016-b01dbd9b2b
xorg-x11-server-1.19.0-0.3.20161026.fc25
0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b152cdd2b0
osinfo-db-20161026-1.fc25
0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-c95b940169
osinfo-db-tools-1.1.0-1.fc25
0 https
Hi everybody,I'm interested in QA.. I really have experience in quality
monitoring, however in mobile network and services. Now telecom and IT are
merging. So it is time to learn new tricks for me :).I am from Kiev Ukraine, 45
years old. Unfortunately I don't have knowledge in Linux and I am new
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 12/101 (x86_64), 3/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20161025.n.0):
ID: 44327 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/44327
ID: 44328 T
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> So after some further consideration I think I'm on board with this, and
> it turned out not to be too hard to implement. I have updated the draft
> test case:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_Testcase_Boot_default_in
The following Fedora 23 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
402 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-16240
nagios-4.0.8-1.fc23
359 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-81ded368fe
miniupnpc-1.9-6.fc23
332 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2
On Tue, 2016-10-18 at 07:54 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> OK, you're right that there are some cases which could bypass our
> testing. That's why I assumed this idea might not fly, even though
> I'd personally have no problem to focus on "reasonable coverage"
> instead of full coverage. But there
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/101 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386)
New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20161025.n.0):
ID: 44499 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/44499
ID: 44524 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_deskto
OLD: Fedora-25-20161025.n.0
NEW: Fedora-25-20161026.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 79
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 69.71 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size
> How about the erratic behavior of 'echo $Wayland_Display'
> (empty string with Gnome login on Asus and curious string
> '-Display' on both logins with Dell).
There is no $Wayland_Display. But there should be $WAYLAND_DISPLAY when under
Wayland. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_debug_Wa
On Tue, 2016-10-25 at 02:12 +0200, AV wrote:
> With the recent updates:
>
> control-center-3.22.1-2.fc25
> gnome-session-3.22.1-2.fc25
> gnome-shell-3.22.1-2.fc25
> switcheroo-control-1.0-1.fc25
>
> Wayland seems to have 'disappeared'!
>
> It is no longer mentioned under Settings-Details.
The f
13 matches
Mail list logo