On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Richard Ryniker wrote:
> I seem to have touched a sore spot on Mr. Murphy, and apologize if I
> have unintentionally irritated him.
What annoys me is that people want to have things two ways. Basically
they want what they want because they want it, which simply isn
On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 01:20:31AM +, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> It sounds to me like liblkid is confused somehow. If you could boot the
>> install media, get to a shell and
>>
>> blkid | fpaste
>>
>> You'll get a URL, post that here.
>
> Here
On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 01:20:31AM +, Chris Murphy wrote:
> It sounds to me like liblkid is confused somehow. If you could boot the
> install media, get to a shell and
>
> blkid | fpaste
>
> You'll get a URL, post that here.
Here it is.
https://paste.fedoraproject.org/421501/29537041/
I may
It sounds to me like liblkid is confused somehow. If you could boot the
install media, get to a shell and
blkid | fpaste
You'll get a URL, post that here.
Chris Murphy
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedora
Hi all,
I have been wanting to have a automated testing of the scientific lab
builds which would be something like this:
1. Download ISO
2. Boot a VM from the live ISO
3. Run my custom scripts/tests and report results
4. Shutdown
Is there already something which I can use to do this?
Best wishe
On Sun, 2016-09-04 at 00:36 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Missing expected images:
>
> Cloud_base raw-xz i386
>
> Failed openQA tests: 8/89 (x86_64), 2/17 (i386)
>
> New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20160902.n.0):
>
> ID: 32069 Test: i386 universal install_package_set_kde
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Failed openQA tests: 8/89 (x86_64), 2/17 (i386)
New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20160902.n.0):
ID: 32069 Test: i386 universal install_package_set_kde
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32069
Old failures (same test faile
On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 01:33:49PM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 09/03/2016 01:14 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> >likely that this gets fixed)
> >
> Even though you don't finish the installation process, the important
> logs have already been created. You can either switch to the
> provided console o
On 09/03/2016 01:14 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
I stop installation when it doesn't detect the partitions, but I can
cetainly give fdisk and parted. I'll make the bug report. (I should add
that due to various and sundry issues, I don't know how much help I can
give anyone trying to debug, and yes,
On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 12:55:04PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-09-03 at 14:21 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
> >
> > On two laptops when I start to run the install, I choose let me configure
> > partitioning. In both cases, I wanted to remove an old Linux installation
> > (these lap
On Sat, 2016-09-03 at 14:21 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
> I have tried this with the server net install and the server DVD.I haven't
> been following this list that closely, but a cursory look
> at archives doesn't show this problem.
>
> On two laptops when I start to run the install, I choose l
I seem to have touched a sore spot on Mr. Murphy, and apologize if I
have unintentionally irritated him. If he is the designer of the
offline update mechanism, and I correctly perceive the implications of
his explanation, then I do scold him for failure to mitigate the
damage that might occur to a
I have tried this with the server net install and the server DVD.I haven't
been following this list that closely, but a cursory look
at archives doesn't show this problem.
On two laptops when I start to run the install, I choose let me configure
partitioning. In both cases, I wanted to remove an
13 matches
Mail list logo
