Re: QA group joining process: new members cannot subscribe to list until approved

2016-08-05 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 16:48 -0600, Viorel Tabara wrote: > On Fri Aug 05 2016 16:08:49 GMT-0600 (MDT) Adam Williamson > wrote: > > > > Still, we could probably clarify the join process in any case. > > What's the purpose of phone number in FAS? It's a piece of personal > information > spammers

Re: QA group joining process: new members cannot subscribe to list until approved

2016-08-05 Thread Viorel Tabara
On Fri Aug 05 2016 16:08:49 GMT-0600 (MDT) Adam Williamson wrote: > Still, we could probably clarify the join process in any case. What's the purpose of phone number in FAS? It's a piece of personal information spammers will never reveal. -- Viorel -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraprojec

Re: QA group joining process: new members cannot subscribe to list until approved

2016-08-05 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 05 Aug 2016 15:08:49 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: > Hmm, sorry. Someone said this was the case on IRC, and I didn't > actually check - I should have. > > Still, we could probably clarify the join process in any case. I'll > come up with a separate proposal for that. Note that the one c

Re: QA group joining process: new members cannot subscribe to list until approved

2016-08-05 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 15:54 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 05 Aug 2016 12:48:39 -0700 > Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > Hi folks! In an IRC discussion with a new member this morning, we > > became aware of an issue (possibly some folks knew about this already, > > but I didn't!) in the joi

Re: QA group joining process: new members cannot subscribe to list until approved

2016-08-05 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 05 Aug 2016 12:48:39 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! In an IRC discussion with a new member this morning, we > became aware of an issue (possibly some folks knew about this already, > but I didn't!) in the joining process. This is mostly of interest to > qa group moderators/spons

Re: QA group joining process: new members cannot subscribe to list until approved

2016-08-05 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 14:22 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote: > Uh, wouldn't the addition of a "captcha" on the signup page make > joining up without requiring additional group memberships easier and > more bot-proof? That would also prevent the sponsors having to deal > with a slew of botted initial con

Re: QA group joining process: new members cannot subscribe to list until approved

2016-08-05 Thread Rick Stevens
On 08/05/2016 12:48 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! In an IRC discussion with a new member this morning, we > became aware of an issue (possibly some folks knew about this already, > but I didn't!) in the joining process. This is mostly of interest to qa > group moderators/sponsors, but I fi

Fedora 24 updates-testing report

2016-08-05 Thread updates
The following Fedora 24 Security updates need testing: Age URL 16 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-4373f7d32a pulp-2.8.6-1.fc24 pulp-docker-2.0.2-1.fc24 pulp-ostree-1.1.2-1.fc24 pulp-puppet-2.8.6-1.fc24 pulp-python-1.1.2-1.fc24 pulp-rpm-2.8.6-1.fc24 14 https://bodhi.f

Fedora 23 updates-testing report

2016-08-05 Thread updates
The following Fedora 23 Security updates need testing: Age URL 320 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-16240 nagios-4.0.8-1.fc23 277 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-81ded368fe miniupnpc-1.9-6.fc23 250 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2

QA group joining process: new members cannot subscribe to list until approved

2016-08-05 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi folks! In an IRC discussion with a new member this morning, we became aware of an issue (possibly some folks knew about this already, but I didn't!) in the joining process. This is mostly of interest to qa group moderators/sponsors, but I figured it can't hurt to make everyone aware. Recently,

Fedora 25-20160805.n.0 compose check report

2016-08-05 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Xfce raw-xz armhfp Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Minimal raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 36/88 (x86_64), 5/17 (i386) ID: 27542 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/test

Re: netinstall 20160730 compose, network is unreachable

2016-08-05 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2016-07-30 at 18:12 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Chris Murphy > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Using Fedora-Workstation-netinst-x86_64-25-20160730.n.0.iso in a > > > Fedora 24 virt-mana

Re: Fedora 25-20160805.n.0 compose check report

2016-08-05 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 08:50 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 14:08 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > > > > Missing expected images: > > > > Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 > > Xfce raw-xz armhfp > > Cloud_base raw-xz i386 > > Atomic raw-xz x86_64 > > Minimal raw-xz armhfp > >

Re: Fedora 25-20160805.n.0 compose check report

2016-08-05 Thread Adam Williamson
QA. I'll try and figure out what's going on and fix it, then re-run the tests. In the mean time you can see more correct results on staging (which is still working fine...), which look mostly like yesterday's: https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests/overview?distri=fedora&vers

Fedora 25-20160805.n.0 compose check report

2016-08-05 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Xfce raw-xz armhfp Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Minimal raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 68/88 (x86_64), 17/17 (i386) ID: 27436 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27