Re: Too fast karma on Bodhi updates

2016-07-10 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 11:22 +0530, Buvanesh Kumar wrote: > Hi Sayan, > I have tested your package and verified it in Fedora 24 release. It works > fine. Thanks for pushing it to bodhi for testing. Since there was no test > case, I just installed it but after careful evaluation, I installed Fedor

Re: Too fast karma on Bodhi updates

2016-07-10 Thread Buvanesh Kumar
Hi Sayan, I have tested your package and verified it in Fedora 24 release. It works fine. Thanks for pushing it to bodhi for testing. Since there was no test case, I just installed it but after careful evaluation, I installed Fedora hubs then I tested out the packages. Thanks, Buvanesh Kumar,

Update about Autocloud deployment

2016-07-10 Thread Kushal Das
Hi all, Below are the notes about Autocloud update happened last week. There were few things which went bad, few points worked well. I am trying to list them here, and how do we plan to make sure that the bad things never happen again. I am ccing Patrick in this mail as he was the contact point fr

Re: Too fast karma on Bodhi updates

2016-07-10 Thread Sumantro Mukherjee
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sun, 2016-07-10 at 21:30 +0530, Sayan Chowdhury wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I recently packaged and pushed an update for > fedmsg-meta-fedora-infrastructure > > to bodhi and exactly 40 secs[1] later I got a +1 to the update. I am > sure that

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2016-07-11 Fedora QA Meeting

2016-07-10 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel tomorrow's QA meeting. I think we pretty much covered all the necessary business in the last couple of weeks and I don't have any agenda topics in mind. If anyone does have something we need to talk about, please reply to this mail and we can schedule the meeting f

Re: Too fast karma on Bodhi updates

2016-07-10 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2016-07-10 at 21:30 +0530, Sayan Chowdhury wrote: > Hi, > > I recently packaged and pushed an update for fedmsg-meta-fedora-infrastructure > to bodhi and exactly 40 secs[1] later I got a +1 to the update. I am sure that > testing a package surely takes more than 40 secs. This makes me real

Too fast karma on Bodhi updates

2016-07-10 Thread Sayan Chowdhury
Hi, I recently packaged and pushed an update for fedmsg-meta-fedora-infrastructure to bodhi and exactly 40 secs[1] later I got a +1 to the update. I am sure that testing a package surely takes more than 40 secs. This makes me really curious that are the packages really being tested before giving o

Fedora Rawhide-20160710.n.0 compose check report

2016-07-10 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Server dvd i386 Server boot x86_64 Server dvd x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Server boot i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Kde raw-xz armhfp Minimal raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 3/13 (x86_64) ID: 25126 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20160710.n.0 changes

2016-07-10 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160709.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160710.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:6 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 210 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 63.47 KiB Size of dropped packages