Re: Fedora 24 Final blocker bug status mail

2016-05-20 Thread Viorel Tabara
On Fri May 20 2016 21:32:33 GMT-0600 (MDT) Samuel Sieb wrote: > You don't need to enter all that. Just check the radio buttons at the bottom > right and put a short comment about whether or not it works for you. If it > doesn't, also put a short explanation of why not. Thanks Samuel, I did ju

Re: TPM prevents grub menu, scratch build request

2016-05-20 Thread Joerg Lechner
Hi, as I said, I can try. Test PCs could be an old 386 Laptop with 524MB Ram (only LXDE), or a fast 64bit Laptop, I think there also should run an i686 workstation. Kind regards -Ursprüngliche Mitteilung- Von: Chris Murphy An: For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releas

Re: TPM prevents grub menu, scratch build request

2016-05-20 Thread Joerg Lechner
Hi, I can try, but I need instructions, what's to do. Kind regards -Ursprüngliche Mitteilung- Von: Chris Murphy An: For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases Verschickt: Fr, 20 Mai 2016 10:05 pm Betreff: TPM prevents grub menu, scratch build request [Bug 133407

Re: Fedora 24 Final blocker bug status mail

2016-05-20 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 05/20/2016 06:01 PM, Viorel Tabara wrote: On Thu May 19 2016 15:48:44 GMT-0600 (MDT) Adam Williamson wrote: 6. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330766 - realmd - MODIFIED [abrt] realmd: g_cancellable_is_cancelled(): realmd killed by SIGSEGV This is an issue in FreeIPA client

Re: i686 got past TPM, but now video problem

2016-05-20 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 05/20/2016 05:04 PM, Peter G. wrote: My suspicion is that, when I installed from the live CD, I had trouble with the graphical mode, so I had to select the graphics lite from the troubleshooting screen and somehow this setting has been made permanent. Yes, that would cause it. Check in the

Re: i686 got past TPM, but now video problem

2016-05-20 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2016-05-20 at 18:04 -0600, Peter G. wrote: > > When I select KDE, there is a lot of screen flashing (mode- > setting?) and artifacts covering half of the screen, then the > starfield background image appears and the KDE logo with the > progress bar. It is all very jerky, not smooth, lik

Re: release criteria for final - bug 1320967

2016-05-20 Thread Chris Murphy
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2016-05-20 at 15:59 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: >> Not every bug limits the test coverage so dramatically to require >> that. > > I'm not sure I particularly buy that. Are there really a lot of people > testing pre-releases by dual-

Re: i686 got past TPM, but now video problem

2016-05-20 Thread Chris Murphy
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Peter G. wrote: > Is there a way I can tell the computer to boot in the proper > mode right at the grub prompt, or even set it permanently? At the grub menu, press e to edit the first entry, find the linux16 line, on that line there might be a nomodeset parameter

Fedora 22 updates-testing report

2016-05-20 Thread updates
The following Fedora 22 Security updates need testing: Age URL 407 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5878 echoping-6.1-0.beta.r434svn.1.fc22 356 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9185 ceph-deploy-1.5.25-1.fc22 289 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/upd

Re: Fedora 24 Final blocker bug status mail

2016-05-20 Thread Viorel Tabara
On Thu May 19 2016 15:48:44 GMT-0600 (MDT) Adam Williamson wrote: > 6. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330766 - realmd - MODIFIED >[abrt] realmd: g_cancellable_is_cancelled(): realmd killed by SIGSEGV > > This is an issue in FreeIPA client enrolment which I hit in manual > testi

i686 got past TPM, but now video problem

2016-05-20 Thread Peter G.
In F23, all went fine, but in F24, some video problems are showing up. After the grub menu, the machine is supposed to switch to the framebuffer and the boot image (fedora infinity goes from white to filled in) appears and one can switch to the boot message display with ESC. Well, not in F24

Re: release criteria for final - bug 1320967

2016-05-20 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2016-05-20 at 15:59 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Adam Williamson > wrote: > > On Fri, 2016-05-20 at 09:55 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Adam Williamson > > > wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2016-05-20 at 10:08 -0400, Joerg Lechne

Re: release criteria for final - bug 1320967

2016-05-20 Thread Chris Murphy
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2016-05-20 at 09:55 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: >> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Adam Williamson >> wrote: >> > On Fri, 2016-05-20 at 10:08 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote: >> > > Hi, >> > > question to Adam Williamson: >> > > Is it p

Re: F24 beta virt-install with kickstart fails

2016-05-20 Thread Viorel Tabara
On Fri May 20 2016 15:02:17 GMT-0600 (MDT) Adam Williamson wrote: > I don't use virt-install, but we've done many kickstart installs of F24 > both manually and in openQA and they work fine. "No space left on device" may hint to wrong partitioning or disk allocation. Jos can you try with a very

Re: F24 - gnome3 - hidpi any better?

2016-05-20 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2016-05-10 at 17:37 +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Nikos Roussos > wrote: > > > On 05/10/2016 03:12 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I just had an email from someone that installed F23 on a box with an > > > hidpi screen. Apparently, even usi

Re: F24 beta virt-install with kickstart fails

2016-05-20 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2016-05-14 at 17:44 +0200, Jos Vos wrote: > Hi, > > Did anyone succeed in virt-install'ing F24 beta using kickstart > (on CentOS 6 host, if that matters)? > > I see lots of warnings (dracut-initqueue), then the console goes > into a slowly filling bar at the bottom (plymouthd!?), then I s

Re: release criteria for final - bug 1320967

2016-05-20 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2016-05-20 at 09:55 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Adam Williamson > wrote: > > On Fri, 2016-05-20 at 10:08 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote: > > > Hi, > > > question to Adam Williamson: > > > Is it possible to file a bug to have a problem shifted from blocking > >

Re: F23 Brightness reduces itself, this problem also in F24?

2016-05-20 Thread Chris Murphy
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Geoffrey Marr wrote: > Chris, > > Did you file a bug on this? I'm seeing it too on F24 on Dell M4600 hardware. I haven't yet, I wasn't sure what component to ding because I'm not sure what's actually changing the backlight automatically. Is it gnome-settings-daem

TPM prevents grub menu, scratch build request

2016-05-20 Thread Chris Murphy
[Bug 1334075] TPM prevents grub menu, drops to grub rescue; BIOS settings no help https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1334075 This is not a blocker since it's i686, but there is a willing tester with affected hardware who can test the recent patch submitted for this bug. Is anyone able/wi

Re: F23 Brightness reduces itself, this problem also in F24?

2016-05-20 Thread Geoffrey Marr
Chris, Did you file a bug on this? I'm seeing it too on F24 on Dell M4600 hardware. Geoff - Original Message - From: "Chris Murphy" To: "Chris Murphy" Cc: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases" Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 9:07:18 PM Subject: Re: F23 Brightness reduce

Re: release criteria for final - bug 1320967

2016-05-20 Thread Joerg Lechner
Hi, there is somewhere proposed (when I remember correctly in an elder bug report concerning the same problem) to use the dual boot system of the other OS, in my case this would be Win 8.1, or a workaround. I disagree with these proposals. I would like to use a downgrade of Grub, if this downgra

Re: release criteria for final - bug 1320967

2016-05-20 Thread Joerg Lechner
Hi, I would like to do a Grub downgrade, this would be a way for me to take part easily in testing with my dual boot system (F24 - Win 8.1). So far I have no success in a F24 Grub downgrade, possibly I do something wrong, so far I have tried the simple way of downgrading: [root@linux joerg]# [

Re: release criteria for final - bug 1320967

2016-05-20 Thread Chris Murphy
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2016-05-20 at 10:08 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote: >> Hi, >> question to Adam Williamson: >> Is it possible to file a bug to have a problem shifted from blocking >> for final i.e. to blocking for Alpha or Beta? >> This is a question fo

Fedora Rawhide-20160520.n.0 compose check report

2016-05-20 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Kde live i386 Workstation live i386 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Kde raw-xz armhfp Minimal raw-xz armhfp Workstation live x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 28/60 (x86_64), 5/15 (i386) ID: 18319 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@u

Fedora 24-20160520.n.0 compose check report

2016-05-20 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Kde live i386 Workstation live i386 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Workstation live x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 4/60 (x86_64), 2/15 (i386) ID: 18408 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests

Re: release criteria for final - bug 1320967

2016-05-20 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2016-05-20 at 10:08 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote: > Hi, > question to Adam Williamson: > Is it possible to file a bug to have a problem shifted from blocking > for final i.e. to blocking for Alpha or Beta? > This is a question for F25 and followers. > Kind regards We can discuss changing the

Re: release criteria for final - bug 1320967

2016-05-20 Thread Joerg Lechner
Hi, question to Adam Williamson: Is it possible to file a bug to have a problem shifted from blocking for final i.e. to blocking for Alpha or Beta? This is a question for F25 and followers. Kind regards -Ursprüngliche Mitteilung- Von: Ahmad Samir An: For testing and quality ass

Fedora 24 compose report: 20160520.n.0 changes

2016-05-20 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-24-20160519.n.0 NEW: Fedora-24-20160520.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:74 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:477.80 MiB Size

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20160520.n.0 changes

2016-05-20 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160519.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160520.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 22 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:73 Upgraded packages: 63 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 624.74 KiB Size of dropped packages