Hi Chris,
I am just starting to understand. "You turn off the support in g-c-c" I don't
understand, whats to be done?. I have installed Colorhug Backlight Utility, a
screenshot shows the first display of this app after installation, so far I did
not make any adjustments. Can You tell me, h
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> And then there's the fact this light sensor in the laptop is under one
> of the speaker grills, so it's probably not a totally hideous way to
> approximate an integrating sphere? But...
There's at least 10 Lux, maybe as much as 30 Lux in th
his? Was it
>>> a clean install or an upgrade?
>
>
>>> My case is an upgrade with Gnome Software. It wasn't happening with
>>> Fedora 23 before the upgrade. I haven't yet tried a clean install of
>>> Fedora 24. I'd think if this were widespre
;t yet tried a clean install of
Fedora 24. I'd think if this were widespread there'd be complaints by
now.
Well it happens with a clean installation of
Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-24-20160518.n.0.iso so I'm not sure
what's up... but whatever the cause is, systemd is giving up
rade. I haven't yet tried a clean install of
> Fedora 24. I'd think if this were widespread there'd be complaints by
> now.
Well it happens with a clean installation of
Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-24-20160518.n.0.iso so I'm not sure
what's up... but whatever the ca
90 second hang at reboot, lsof reports many user session processes
aren't quitting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1337307
There are a bunch of services running as user chris that do not quit
well after a log out. I think that's what's causing exactly 1m30s hang
when trying to reboot o
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 27/72 (x86_64), 5/17 (i386)
ID: 17980 Test: i386 Workstation-live-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/17980
ID: 17981 Test: i3
Missing expected images:
Kde live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Failed openQA tests: 6/66 (x86_64), 2/16 (i386)
ID: 18075 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/18075
ID: 18081 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_s
OLD: Fedora-24-20160517.n.0
NEW: Fedora-24-20160518.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:36
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 75
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 69.45 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size
On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 11:04 -0700, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
> for Fedora 24 Branched 20160518.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
> nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 24 Branched 20160518.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Daytime: Ambient reports either 61 Lux - 43 Lux the whole day. At 58
> Lux, backlight looks like 75% according to the graph. There's no raw
> value visible. And I'm not inclined to change the brightness. But even
> if it went up or down, ch
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 17 May 2016 at 22:33, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> Settings > Power > Automatic brightness = On is the problem.
>
> This is probably my doing, I added the feature for F23 IIRC.
>
>> On my system it'll even go to the last setting and turn the
>
On 17 May 2016 at 22:33, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Settings > Power > Automatic brightness = On is the problem.
This is probably my doing, I added the feature for F23 IIRC.
> On my system it'll even go to the last setting and turn the
> display off as the room gets dark.
So setting the panel to 0%
On 18 May 2016 at 14:41, Joerg Lechner wrote:
> Hi,
> my question and suggestion is not to have an important issue like this
> -for having one computer as test machine for a new release and in parallell
> for another OS - as a blocker for Final but earlier as a blocker for Alpha
> or Beta, then
Hi,
my question and suggestion is not to have an important issue like this -for
having one computer as test machine for a new release and in parallell for
another OS - as a blocker for Final but earlier as a blocker for Alpha or
Beta, then at least for me it's easier to help testing in a new r
On 18 May 2016 at 07:39, Joerg Lechner wrote:
> Hi,
> I use an about one year old Acer laptop, internal disk Win 8.1, F23/F24 on
> usb flash media, for F20/21/22/23 I tested as user, using the Fedora
> version in development. Because of "
> F24 Alpha 1.7 Desktop - Grub boot menue, not possible to
17 matches
Mail list logo
