On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 10:22 PM, P. Gueckel wrote:
> On my laptop, I notice that the kernel that got
> installed from the Workstation live disc is kernel. I
> did an update and now I see that the very same
> numbered kernel, but the pae version, has now been
> installed.
>
> I just checked and, u
Felix Miata wrote:
> There probably isn't a motherboard in existence with
a BIOS that old that
> does not require a genuine DOS boot to update its
BIOS. That should be no
> impediment to any Linux user, as DOS boot media to
facilitate flashing are
> readily available. e.g. from
http://www.boot
On my laptop, I notice that the kernel that got
installed from the Workstation live disc is kernel. I
did an update and now I see that the very same
numbered kernel, but the pae version, has now been
installed.
I just checked and, unlike previous releases, F24 ha
no /etc/sysconfig/kernel file
On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 9:58 PM, P. Gueckel wrote:
> Chris Murphy wrote:
>
>> You might check if
>> the firmware is current.
>
> The firmware is ancient. I haven't had windows (XP)
> since about 2000.
>
> I haven't ever managed to figure out how to do BIOS
> updates in Linux. Is it possible?
It's
P. Gueckel composed on 2016-05-07 21:58 (UTC-0600):
The firmware is ancient. I haven't had windows (XP)
since about 2000.
I haven't ever managed to figure out how to do BIOS
updates in Linux. Is it possible?
There probably isn't a motherboard in existence with a BIOS that old that
does no
Chris Murphy wrote:
> You might check if
> the firmware is current.
The firmware is ancient. I haven't had windows (XP)
since about 2000.
I haven't ever managed to figure out how to do BIOS
updates in Linux. Is it possible?
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
http
On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 8:29 PM, P. Gueckel wrote:
> Chris Murphy wrote:
>
>> On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 7:48 PM, P. Gueckel
> wrote:
>>> Mike Chambers wrote:
>>>
Maybe you need to boot up into rescue mode and
>>> reinstall grub? I've had
to do that a few times during fresh installs
> lat
Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 7:48 PM, P. Gueckel
wrote:
>> Mike Chambers wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe you need to boot up into rescue mode and
>> reinstall grub? I've had
>>> to do that a few times during fresh installs
lately.
>>
>> That had already occurred to me. How do I select
>>
On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 7:48 PM, P. Gueckel wrote:
> Mike Chambers wrote:
>
>> Maybe you need to boot up into rescue mode and
> reinstall grub? I've had
>> to do that a few times during fresh installs lately.
>
> That had already occurred to me. How do I select
> rescue mode, when I cannot even g
Mike Chambers wrote:
> Maybe you need to boot up into rescue mode and
reinstall grub? I've had
> to do that a few times during fresh installs lately.
That had already occurred to me. How do I select
rescue mode, when I cannot even get the grub menu? I
the tried, from grub rescue, typing set r
Maybe you need to boot up into rescue mode and reinstall grub? I've had to do
that a few times during fresh installs lately.
-Original Message-
From: P. Gueckel [mailto:pguec...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2016 7:54 PM
To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Fedora 24 beta (nea
I installed the latest version, which is pretty likely
what will become F24ß.
On my desktop computer, everything appears to have
gone smoothly, although I have had little time to
experiment. Getting back into my old system, F23, gave
me some problems, since osprober (?) generated menu
items f
Mike Chambers composed on 2016-05-07 17:28 (UTC-0500):
Felix Miata composed on 2016-05-07 17:38 (UTC-0400):
...
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303860
...
> Not sure if same problem, but min is an Intel HD Graphics 530.
> And I am on Cinnamon, using lightdm.
> Might be same conce
HD Graphics 530
Maybe the 1303860 but not sure.
-Original Message-
From: Felix Miata [mailto:mrma...@earthlink.net]
Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2016 4:39 PM
To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: Fedora 24 beta graphics not starting
Mike Chambers composed on 2016-05-07 15:53 (UTC-050
Not sure if same problem, but min is an Intel HD Graphics 530.
And I am on Cinnamon, using lightdm.
Might be same concept though, as it happens when trying to do an install, or if
do an upgrade, then it won't start up X at all.
-Original Message-
From: Michal Jaegermann [mailto:michal.
On Sat, May 07, 2016 at 05:38:31PM -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> Mike Chambers composed on 2016-05-07 15:53 (UTC-0500):
>
> > Just tried to start my Fedora 24 installl and it does fine except when it
> > tries to start up graphics, it'd don't.
>
> One of these look like the same thing?
> https://b
Mike Chambers composed on 2016-05-07 15:53 (UTC-0500):
Just tried to start my Fedora 24 installl and it does fine except when it
tries to start up graphics, it'd don't. I also did a dnf update and it did
fine, except X server won't start.
Which gfxchip do you have?
Seelinu=0 was used and s
Just tried to start my Fedora 24 installl and it does fine except when it
tries to start up graphics, it'd don't. I also did a dnf update and it did
fine, except X server won't start.
Seelinu=0 was used and still no luck.
Any ideas?
Mike Chambers
Madisonville, KY
The following Fedora 24 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
30 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-2e339a7779
optipng-0.7.6-1.fc24
9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f3b40fcbc3
jenkins-mailer-plugin-1.17-1.fc24 jenkins-credentials-plugin-1.27-1.f
The following Fedora 23 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
230 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-16240
nagios-4.0.8-1.fc23
187 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-81ded368fe
miniupnpc-1.9-6.fc23
160 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2
The following Fedora 22 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
394 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5878
echoping-6.1-0.beta.r434svn.1.fc22
343 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9185
ceph-deploy-1.5.25-1.fc22
275 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/upd
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 30/72 (x86_64), 6/17 (i386)
ID: 16444 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/16444
ID: 16445 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi
22 matches
Mail list logo