Missing expected images:
Kde live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Failed openQA tests: 5/63 (x86_64), 2/16 (i386)
ID: 14664 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/14664
ID: 14674 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_s
On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 18:04 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> On 27/04/16 09:13 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hey folks! Just to keep everyone in the loop, here's what's going on
> > with F24 Beta:
> >
> > we have two outstanding accepted blockers that need fixing before we
> > can spin a 'releas
On 27/04/16 09:13 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hey folks! Just to keep everyone in the loop, here's what's going on
> with F24 Beta:
>
> we have two outstanding accepted blockers that need fixing before we
> can spin a 'release candidate':
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321330
> h
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 11:32 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 09:13:36 -0700,
>> Adam Williamson wrote:
>> >
>> > So please expect the RC to arrive in the next several hours, if all
>> > goes well, and be ready to
On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 09:13 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hey folks! Just to keep everyone in the loop, here's what's going on
> with F24 Beta:
>
> we have two outstanding accepted blockers that need fixing before we
> can spin a 'release candidate':
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi
On 27 April 2016 at 20:39, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> f24-backgrounds is updated with new version of default wallpapers in
> addition of its supplements. 24.1.1-1 is now pushed rather than 24.1.0-1
> because of the recent changes based on feedback from Gnome Software
> maintainer.
I've tested thi
Hello testers and team,
f24-backgrounds is updated with new version of default wallpapers in
addition of its supplements. 24.1.1-1 is now pushed rather than 24.1.0-1
because of the recent changes based on feedback from Gnome Software
maintainer.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-201
On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 20:35 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 04/27/2016 08:11 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 09:13 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > Hey folks! Just to keep everyone in the loop, here's what's going on
> > > with F24 Beta:
> > >
> > > we have two outstanding
On 04/27/2016 08:11 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 09:13 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hey folks! Just to keep everyone in the loop, here's what's going on
with F24 Beta:
we have two outstanding accepted blockers that need fixing before we
can spin a 'release candidate':
http
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:11:24AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> (only built for F23 for some reason) - please do try it out and give
> feedback. But we can't do an F24 RC with this issue outstanding,
> really. We could try an extremely dodgy 'it's not really a blocker'
> fudge or some kind of he
On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 09:13 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hey folks! Just to keep everyone in the loop, here's what's going on
> with F24 Beta:
>
> we have two outstanding accepted blockers that need fixing before we
> can spin a 'release candidate':
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi
On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 11:32 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 09:13:36 -0700,
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > So please expect the RC to arrive in the next several hours, if all
> > goes well, and be ready to test :) It won't be super different from the
> > current nightl
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 09:13:36 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
So please expect the RC to arrive in the next several hours, if all
goes well, and be ready to test :) It won't be super different from the
current nightly, but we'll at least need to do sanity testing and make
sure we cover the fe
Hey folks! Just to keep everyone in the loop, here's what's going on
with F24 Beta:
we have two outstanding accepted blockers that need fixing before we
can spin a 'release candidate':
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321330
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259865
a kerne
Hey Ahmad,
Welcome to Fedora QA, since you have past experience with QA already, this
should be fairly straight forward. F24 release is in beta now, and we need
people to help us out with validation testing. You can start off by going to
[1] grab an fedora iso for yourself, jump to [2] , choo
Missing expected images:
Kde live i386
Workstation live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Workstation live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 16/58 (x86_64), 6/15 (i386)
ID: 14587 Test: x86_64 Atomic-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/
Hello. My name is Ahmad; I started using Linux a couple of years ago. I
used other distros then switched to Fedora and it seems I'll be sticking
around for a while so might as well try to use my free time to give back to
the Linux/Fedora ecosystem.
I'd spent some time in the past doing bugzilla wo
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160426.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160427.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 7
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 92
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 32.81 MiB
Size of dropped packages
18 matches
Mail list logo
