On 03/31/16 07:48, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2016-03-31 at 07:40 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi all F24 testers,
I installed F24 alpha from Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-24_Alpha-7.iso
and played a little bit with it.
I'm missing the functionality of nautilus-open-terminal: It's impossi
On Thu, 2016-03-31 at 07:40 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi all F24 testers,
>
> I installed F24 alpha from Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-24_Alpha-7.iso
> and played a little bit with it.
>
> I'm missing the functionality of nautilus-open-terminal: It's impossible
> to open a gnome-terminal
Hi all F24 testers,
I installed F24 alpha from Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-24_Alpha-7.iso
and played a little bit with it.
I'm missing the functionality of nautilus-open-terminal: It's impossible
to open a gnome-terminal in some nautilus window (displaying some
directory) by a popup menu
Hi everyone,
I'm Arvind - a 20yr old Computer Science student from Mysore, India. I
specialize mainly in fullstack web development, and try my best to contribute
to open-source projects (https://github.com/arvindch). You can find me on IRC
@arvindch / @achembar.
I'm excited to be working with
On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 08:09 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Template:Installation_test_matrix
> >
> > quite a lot of the tables have 'i386' and 'x86_64' as environments.
> > Especially with the Milestone column, listing i386 alongside x86_64 is
> > a bit misleadin
On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 15:56 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 21:30 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I go by search :
> > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=kernel
> > >
#483: New Live USB Creator Test Day
--+
Reporter: adamwill | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 24
Component: Test Day | Version:
Keywords:| Blocked By:
Blocking:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 21:30 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> > I go by search :
>> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=kernel
>> Ok so I just happened to have picked things that don't have any Fedora
>> 24 builds. If I stop
Hey folks! Just thought I'd keep people up to date on this: I'm gonna
temporarily disable the validation event creation bot because we happen
to know that F24 composes are completely borked right now, and I don't
really want to get an event for one of them. We need a new anaconda
build to fix the C
On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 15:08 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 11:52 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> >
> > The way I understood it, the question to ask yourself is this: what
> > happens if I'm running Fedora 23 and I go to getfedora.org to
> > download
> > Fedora 24 Works
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 03:08:34PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Ah, I see. I believe the primary target for live-usb-creator is people
> who are not using fedora yet (I hear there's still some of those out
> there...).
There's also the case of making install media to use on another system
or to
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 11:52:47AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> It would seem a bit strange to give me a tarball download, for
> instance. Presumably it should be set up so the download link causes
> the liveusb-creator package (or whatever it gets renamed to) to be
> installed the 'proper' way.
On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 11:52 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> The way I understood it, the question to ask yourself is this: what
> happens if I'm running Fedora 23 and I go to getfedora.org to
> download
> Fedora 24 Workstation?
>
> It would seem a bit strange to give me a tarball download, for
Note:
1-) Fedora-KDE-Live-x86_64-24_Alpha-7.iso
already has the new interface for liveusb-creator installed.
2-)"Custom OS" crashes: when [select live iso] is selected
"QWidget: Cannot create a QWidget without QApplication
Aborted (core dumped)"
Thus any test .iso's cannot be accessed (ie
On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 14:16 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 12:07 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > For Fedora Workstation, can we kick this over to GNOME Software, or
> > should it be actually a separate, standalone download? What about
> > with
> > other spins
On 03/30/2016 11:08 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
However it seems that since the last update of the iwl* files, or maybe
the NetworkManager files, kernel 4.5 will not start the WiFi. From what
I can see the fact that NetworkManager is still a running service means
that the wired Ethernet port cannot
On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 12:07 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
>
> For Fedora Workstation, can we kick this over to GNOME Software, or
> should it be actually a separate, standalone download? What about
> with
> other spins or non-edition Fedora running GNOME?
Can you clarify what "kick this over to
My Lenovo T500 will not boot 4.6 though it will 4.5 ones. I have posted
a bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320922
However it seems that since the last update of the iwl* files, or maybe
the NetworkManager files, kernel 4.5 will not start the WiFi. From what
I can see the f
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 01:32:13PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> Yeah, good point. "Primary" should at least cover most people hitting
> the site. Smooge is running historical web statistics now and we
> should shortly be able to answer better what OSes people are visiting
> with currently.
And b
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 09:23:22AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > I think we want it on Windows 7+ and at least the most recent couple of
> > versions of OS X. But if we don't have one, I don't think that should
> > be a blocker — we can just offer it where available, right?
> Well I think the i
Missing expected images:
Kde live i386
Workstation live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Workstation live x86_64
Images in this compose but not 24-20160329.n.1:
Security live x86_64
Security live i386
Jam_kde live x86_64
Docker_base docker
On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 12:07 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 07:06:11PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >
> > My 2 cents is it should be the primary download for Beta release, and
> > if that's not possible then push it to Fedora 25. And also what are
> Yeah, I agree. We'll need
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 07:06:11PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> My 2 cents is it should be the primary download for Beta release, and
> if that's not possible then push it to Fedora 25. And also what are
Yeah, I agree. We'll need at least a round of testing like that
*somewhere*, and if not beta,
On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 12:49 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Failed openQA tests: 60 of 68
anaconda blew up in blivet:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322497
it's being looked into now. Consider this compose as unusable for Rawhide
install. Yesterday's compose mostly worked,
hey folks! Just for the last couple of days when I file a bug that was
found by openQA, I've been putting an 'openqa' tag on it in Bugzilla
(BZ has a 'Tags' field we haven't used an awful lot till now). I
figured this will come in handy if you're looking at openQA results,
seeing a fail, and wonder
OLD: Fedora-24-20160329.n.1
NEW: Fedora-24-20160330.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added packages: 11
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 90
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.24 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages: 385.07 MiB
Size of
Missing expected images:
Kde live i386
Workstation live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Workstation live x86_64
No images in this compose but not Rawhide-20160329.n.0
Images in Rawhide-20160329.n.0
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160329.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160330.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 102
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 8.06 MiB
Size of dropped packages:419.55 KiB
Size of upgraded packages: 1.09 GiB
28 matches
Mail list logo
