About the proposed final blocker regarding DrKonqi (1301092)

Hi folks. Just a note for the next blocker review... Yesterday I've proposed this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi? id=1301092 As Rex pointed out, this bug is present on F23 and it isn't reproducible on Rawhide. I can confirm the app seems to work properly on F24 (should have paid more

Fedora 22 updates-testing report

The following Fedora 22 Security updates need testing: Age URL 319 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5878 echoping-6.1-0.beta.r434svn.1.fc22 268 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9185 ceph-deploy-1.5.25-1.fc22 201 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/upd

Re: A modest proposal: Pungi 4 compose process (what we call composes, when we do them, what information we need about them)

On Mon, 2016-02-22 at 10:04 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > Also not visible in the mockup: "compose override" packages are *always > > > included in all types of compose*. This is the concept Dennis and I > > > came up with for handling blocker / freeze exception fixes; it's just a > > > more

Re: A modest proposal: Pungi 4 compose process (what we call composes, when we do them, what information we need about them)

On Mon, 2016-02-22 at 10:04 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > This hasn't been a problem so far, because I actually built Wikitcms > and fedfind kinda backwards - their conception of how composes should > be identified is actually derived directly from how we name release > validation events. :P In A

Re: A modest proposal: Pungi 4 compose process (what we call composes, when we do them, what information we need about them)

On Mon, 2016-02-22 at 08:09 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote: > > or it's relatively easy to do a numeric sort > > instead (just filter all the non-digit characters and do a numeric sort > > on the rest). > I don't follow you here. If we have > 24-20160510.2.c > 24-20160510.10.c > Then after filtering out

Fedora Rawhide 20160222 compose check report

No missing expected images. Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20160221: Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64 Games live x86_64 Design_suite live x86_64 Games live i386 Kde disk raw armhfp Kde live i386 Scientific_kde live x86_64 Cloud_atomic disk qcow x86_64 Scientific_kde live i386 Design_suite liv

Re: glibc in tet repos

Den 2016-02-22 kl. 15:29, skrev Jonathan Calloway: > Hello! > > Has the glibc patch been placed in the test repos? Yes! $ rpm -qi glibc Name: glibc Version : 2.21 Release : 11.fc22 Architecture: x86_64 Install Date: tor 18 feb 2016 10:50:15 Group : System Environment/Librar

glibc in tet repos

Hello! Has the glibc patch been placed in the test repos? Thanks! Jonathan -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: A modest proposal: Pungi 4 compose process (what we call composes, when we do them, what information we need about them)

> # tl;dr > > (LATER) OK, this email got really long, so here's my tl;dr summary. > Proposed compose ID scheme: (RELEASE)-(DATE).(INDEX).(TYPE), e.g. > 24-20160401.0.s (types are SNAPSHOT, CANDIDATE, POSTRELEASE). > Alternatively: type is stored as separate bit of metadata instead of > / as well a

rawhide report: 20160222 changes

Compose started at Mon Feb 22 05:15:03 UTC 2016 Broken deps for i386 -- [3Depict] 3Depict-0.0.18-3.fc24.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.4.0 [IQmol] IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0

Re: GDM failing to start…

> …just checking in before reporting a bug. > > From what I can see GDM is trying to start, Xorg is starting… hummm is > that a problem in itself? Then the sad screen appears allowing me to > log out (except that I haven't logged in as yet! > > The machines are working fine per se, so no problems