Sounds good
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 5:12 AM, Jared K. Smith
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Adam Williamson <
> adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>> Does this general approach sound good? If so, I'll post some drafts
>> later in the week. Thanks!
>>
>
>
> Sounds great to me.
>
> -
The following Fedora 23 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
121 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-16240
nagios-4.0.8-1.fc23
79 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-81ded368fe
miniupnpc-1.9-6.fc23
52 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2
The following Fedora 22 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
285 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5878
echoping-6.1-0.beta.r434svn.1.fc22
234 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9185
ceph-deploy-1.5.25-1.fc22
167 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/upd
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Does this general approach sound good? If so, I'll post some drafts
> later in the week. Thanks!
>
Sounds great to me.
--
Jared Smith
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin
On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 17:21:33 -0800
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi, folks! I'm working through some criteria issues that came up
> during F23 validation.
...snip...
> Does this general approach sound good? If so, I'll post some drafts
> later in the week. Thanks!
Sounds good to me.
kevin
pgp73Hh
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 05:21:33PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> "Unless explicitly specified otherwise, SELinux must be enabled and in
> enforcing mode in live environments and after system installation."
Makese sense to me.
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
--
test mailing list
test@l
Hi, folks! I'm working through some criteria issues that came up during
F23 validation.
Here's one: a few times, we hit issues on live images which would have
been violations of the 'post-install' release criteria, except those
are explicitly for 'installed' systems. We generally felt that the
rel
>> I dount it's intentional, I suspect it's more than no one has needed
>> gstreamermm 1.0 and hence not packaged it up.
>
> Pity though. C is not a good language for writing applications. Sadly
> there is chicken and egg situation here: only C API is available so
> people do not use C++ so the pac
On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 16:43 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Missing expected images:
>
> Kde disk raw armhfp
> Kde live i386
> Kde live x86_64
>
> No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20160118
>
> Images in Rawhide 20160118 but not this:
>
> Kde live i386
> Scientific_kde live x86_6
On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 08:08 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
[…]
>
> I dount it's intentional, I suspect it's more than no one has needed
> gstreamermm 1.0 and hence not packaged it up.
Pity though. C is not a good language for writing applications. Sadly
there is chicken and egg situation here: only
Missing expected images:
Kde disk raw armhfp
Kde live i386
Kde live x86_64
No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20160118
Images in Rawhide 20160118 but not this:
Kde live i386
Scientific_kde live x86_64
Cloud_atomic vagrant virtualbox x86_64
Scientific_kde live i386
Cloud_atomic vagrant li
Compose started at Tue Jan 19 05:15:02 UTC 2016
Broken deps for i386
--
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0
> Debian Sid and Fedora Rawhide both have gstreamer-0.10 and gstreamer-
> 1.0 libraries, seemingly the full set. However Sid only has Gstreamermm
> 1.0 and Rawhide only has Gstreamermm 0.10. Is this intentional? It does
> make things somewhat awkward creating Gstreamer application with C++.
I doun
Hi,
Debian Sid and Fedora Rawhide both have gstreamer-0.10 and gstreamer-
1.0 libraries, seemingly the full set. However Sid only has Gstreamermm
1.0 and Rawhide only has Gstreamermm 0.10. Is this intentional? It does
make things somewhat awkward creating Gstreamer application with C++.
--
Russe
14 matches
Mail list logo
