On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 02:41 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote:
> Hi Adam,
> current version of rapid-photo-downloader in F23 Final RC2:
> Name: rapid-photo-downloader
> Arch: noarch
> Epoch : 0
> Version : 0.4.10
> Release : 3.fc23
>
> Damon has updated the bug 1272457 :
> "
Hi Adam,
current version of rapid-photo-downloader in F23 Final RC2:
Name: rapid-photo-downloader
Arch: noarch
Epoch : 0
Version : 0.4.10
Release : 3.fc23
Damon has updated the bug 1272457 :
"Fixed in upstream version 0.4.11:
https://launchpad.net/rapid/trunk/0.4.11/
On Sun, 2015-10-11 at 13:06 +0200, Benjamin Kuhnert wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> i'd like to join the Fedora QA team. Since i'm using Fedora Linux for
> all my daily tasks i decided to contribute with the project. Without
> further ado, let me introduce myself.
Welcome Benjamin, and also Denis! I've appr
No missing expected images.
No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151021
Images in Rawhide 20151021 but not this:
Cloud docker x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 18 of 52
ID: 6908Test: x86_64 universal server_multi_empty
ID: 6904Test: x86_64 universal server_multi_empty@uefi
ID:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Recently, we discovered a bug in gnutls that caused Cockpit to be
unreachable by recent versions of Google Chrome. It was ambiguous what
the release criteria actually means, since it didn't specify which
browser applications were blocking. I'd like to
At the Fedora 23 Final Go/No-Go Meeting that just ends, was agreed *not to
release* the Fedora 23 Final.
Due to present blockers in the RC2 build, the decision is No-Go. The
release slips for one week. Second Go/No-Go meeting to be planned for the
next Thursday.
Meeting details can be seen here:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 18:30:02 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
valuable, but there's no need to go all out. At present I'm expecting
we'll build an RC3 tomorrow and focus on testing that really thoroughly
over the next 7 days (and any further RCs that turn out to be
necessary).
Is the new bui
On 10/22/2015 08:18 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
> New test results: If I blank the DVD separately by "wodim -v dev=/dev/sr0
> blank=fast", then the DVD can be burned without flaw.
>
> Maybe, the blanking procedure in K3B is buggy -:(
Well I ran the Format/Blank operation in K3B. I had to tell it
On 22.10.2015 12:53, Ed Greshko wrote:
(Resend to correct list)
On 10/22/2015 02:58 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
On 22.10.2015 07:34, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 10/22/2015 01:29 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi F23 testers,
anybody has been successful in burning an image (for example the Fedora TC11
bo
Compose started at Thu Oct 22 07:15:03 UTC 2015
Removed package: vfrnav-20141211-1.fc22
Summary:
Added Packages: 0
Removed Packages: 1
Modified Packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 (0 )
Size change of modified packages: 0 (0 )
Size of removed packages: 7381878 (7.0 M)
Size change: -7381
Compose started at Thu Oct 22 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0
(Resend to correct list)
On 10/22/2015 02:58 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
> On 22.10.2015 07:34, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 10/22/2015 01:29 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
>>> Hi F23 testers,
>>>
>>> anybody has been successful in burning an image (for example the Fedora
>>> TC11 boot iso) to a not empty D
On 22.10.2015 10:21, Joerg Lechner wrote:
Hi Joachim,
I burned just a DVD with TC11, but it's not a RW DVD. The TC11 iso is bootable.
In addition that I used not a RW DVD my system differs from Yours (Acer Laptop
E15 E5),
and -when remember correctly- You have installed Alpha and installed all
Hi Joachim,
I burned just a DVD with TC11, but it's not a RW DVD. The TC11 iso is bootable.
In addition that I used not a RW DVD my system differs from Yours (Acer Laptop
E15 E5), and -when remember correctly- You have installed Alpha and installed
all updates up to current TC11, I made a fresh
14 matches
Mail list logo