Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel Monday's QA meeting. I think
everything's pretty much on track - we have Final TC1 to test, might be
a TC2 coming this week, and there'll be Cinnamon Test Day on Thursday.
There'll be a blocker review meeting at 1600 UTC.
If anyone does have something they think c
#476: Proposed Test Day - Cinnamon Spin
---+---
Reporter: grinnz| Owner: adamwill
Type: task | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 23
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywo
The following Fedora 23 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
61 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-12739
python-kdcproxy-0.3.2-1.fc23
45 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-13824
python-django-1.8.4-1.fc23
43 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/update
The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
247 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1467
openstack-glance-2014.1.3-4.fc21
127 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9090
fossil-1.33-1.fc21
127 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDO
No missing expected images.
No images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20151003
No images in 23 Branched 20151003 but not this.
Failed openQA tests: 8 of 52
ID: 4737Test: i386 workstation_live default_install
ID: 4734Test: x86_64 kde_live default_install
ID: 4733Test:
No missing expected images.
No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151003
No images in Rawhide 20151003 but not this.
Failed openQA tests: 46 of 52
ID: 4685Test: i386 workstation_live default_install
ID: 4684Test: i386 kde_live default_install
ID: 4681Test: x86_64 k
# F23 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2015-10-05
# Time: 1600 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
It's that time of the week again: blocker review time! There's currently
11 proposed blockers we need to look through. We'll be meeting at our
usual time and location.
If you ha
On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 10:36:53AM -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 10:14:19AM -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote:
> > Hi,
> > since some F23 releases Grub points for booting not to the newest kernel
> > but to the last but one. I remenber there was a thread about in F22, but I
> >
On 04.10.2015 16:14, Joerg Lechner wrote:
Hi,
since some F23 releases Grub points for booting not to the newest kernel but to
the last but one. I remenber there was a thread about in F22, but I don't
remember the solution. Currently F23 Desktop Final TC1 x86_64. Is this only my
problem, or do
On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 10:14:19AM -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote:
> Hi,
> since some F23 releases Grub points for booting not to the newest kernel but
> to the last but one. I remenber there was a thread about in F22, but I don't
> remember the solution. Currently F23 Desktop Final TC1 x86_64. Is th
Hi,
since some F23 releases Grub points for booting not to the newest kernel but to
the last but one. I remenber there was a thread about in F22, but I don't
remember the solution. Currently F23 Desktop Final TC1 x86_64. Is this only my
problem, or do someone else see similar behaviour?
Kind Reg
Compose started at Sun Oct 4 07:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[CableSwig]
CableSwig-3.20.0-13.fc23.armv7hl requires gccxml
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws)
Compose started at Sun Oct 4 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[CableSwig]
CableSwig-3.20.0-13.fc23.i686 requires gccxml
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.f
13 matches
Mail list logo