On Sat, 25 Jul 2015, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 11:27:32 -0400
Scott Robbins wrote:
Anyway, for those who don't think this is a good idea, I've opened a
bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246771
Please don't.
This is being worked out via a FESCo standardized pas
On 07/26/2015 04:14 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
After installation, I create a user who is a member of the wheel group.
Each time this user logs in, (and probably if the user hasn't done
something with sudo in the last five minutes), they're given the lecture,
"We trust you have received the usual w
I've duplicated this on 3 installs now, but haven't seen any other mention
of it.
Each install has been from the Server netinstall and choosing minimal as
the package group.
After installation, I create a user who is a member of the wheel group.
Each time this user logs in, (and probably if the
On Sun, 2015-07-26 at 12:37 -0300, tangen...@hushmail.com wrote:
>Hi, folks.
>I installeed Fedora23 Alpha TC2 and it works fine, but
> I wish to access the page of updates-testing. Which is the URL and
> how
> can I do this?
>Thank you.
>
Hi, folks.
I installeed Fedora23 Alpha TC2 and it works fine, but
I wish to access the page of updates-testing. Which is the URL and how
can I do this?
Thank you.
Edward
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
h
On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 09:09:00 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> This may or may not have anything to do with your problem but it's one I
> ran into with dnf...
>
> I was trying to update a package I KNEW was in updates-testing (I pushed it
> myself) but when I asked dnf to update it it gave me the "Not
On 07/26/15 21:50, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> i did all of the above and, as ed(?) suggested, i may just be
> unluckily hitting an out-of-date mirror.
FWIW, if you look back on "updates-testing reports" you'd see that the last one
to have "cockpit" was this one.
Konsole output
https://lists.fed
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Dom, 2015-07-26 at 09:09 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > While that's certainly the correct behavior, the lack of any sort of
> > USEFUL message to the user is extremely confusing and frustrating.
> >
> >
> You could use --best :
I would
On Dom, 2015-07-26 at 09:09 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> This may or may not have anything to do with your problem but it's one
> I ran into with dnf...
>
>
> I was trying to update a package I KNEW was in updates-testing (I
> pushed it myself) but when I asked dnf to update it it gave me the
> "
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 21:48:36 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
The games spin doesn't show up in either list, so it seems the compose
wasn't even attempted for some reason; Dennis should be able to say
what the deal is.
My guess is that it was because when the ks renanes were done, it broke
This may or may not have anything to do with your problem but it's one I
ran into with dnf...
I was trying to update a package I KNEW was in updates-testing (I pushed it
myself) but when I asked dnf to update it it gave me the "Nothing to do"
message.
After that I tried all the dnf clean metadata
On Sun, 26 Jul 2015, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Dom, 2015-07-26 at 06:04 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Sun, 26 Jul 2015, Rares Aioanei wrote:
> >
> > > Did you run 'dnf update' after enabling the repo? What does 'dnf
> > > repolist' say?
> >
> > i've run "sudo dnf update" a number of times
On Dom, 2015-07-26 at 06:04 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jul 2015, Rares Aioanei wrote:
>
> > Did you run 'dnf update' after enabling the repo? What does 'dnf
> > repolist' say?
>
> i've run "sudo dnf update" a number of times, tells me "Nothing to
> do". and:
>
> $ dnf repolist
Compose started at Sun Jul 26 07:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws)
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires
mvn(org.apache.juddi:
On Sun, 26 Jul 2015, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 07/26/15 17:55, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > as you can see, the installed version is 0.60, while the
> > updates-testing version is 0.62. so ... what am i misunderstanding
> > here?
>
> Not sure why you're seeing Version : 0.62 in updates-testing. I
>
On 07/26/15 18:19, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> [rpjday@localhost yum.repos.d]$ dnf info cockpit
> langpacks: No languages are enabled
> Last metadata expiration check performed 2 days, 14:04:08 ago on Thu
> Jul 23 16:13:59 2015.
> Installed Packages
> Name: cockpit
> Arch: x86_64
> Ep
On Sun, 26 Jul 2015, Carlos Morel-Riquelme wrote:
> Hello Robert, well if you have enable=1 the update-testing repo try this:
>
> dnf clean all
now, just to be clear, i shouldn't *need* to do this, correct? in
any case, i did and:
$ sudo dnf clean all
[sudo] password for rpjday:
langpacks: No
On 07/26/15 17:55, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> as you can see, the installed version is 0.60, while the
> updates-testing version is 0.62. so ... what am i misunderstanding
> here?
Not sure why you're seeing Version : 0.62 in updates-testing. I don't see it.
Maybe you need to clean your meta da
On 26 July 2015 at 11:03, Carlos Morel-Riquelme
wrote:
> Hello Robert, well if you have enable=1 the update-testing repo try this:
>
> dnf clean all && dnf install
>
>
Please stop telling people to run 'dnf clean all', which will remove cached
packages that will often just be downloaded again. I
On Sun, 26 Jul 2015, Rares Aioanei wrote:
> Did you run 'dnf update' after enabling the repo? What does 'dnf
> repolist' say?
i've run "sudo dnf update" a number of times, tells me "Nothing to
do". and:
$ dnf repolist
langpacks: No languages are enabled
Last metadata expiration check performed
Hello Robert, well if you have enable=1 the update-testing repo try this:
dnf clean all && dnf install
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 6:55 AM, Robert P. J. Day
wrote:
>
> even though i've enabled the updates-testing repo on my fedora 22
> system, i can't seem to update to the newer packages in that
Did you run 'dnf update' after enabling the repo? What does 'dnf repolist'
say?
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Robert P. J. Day
wrote:
>
> even though i've enabled the updates-testing repo on my fedora 22
> system, i can't seem to update to the newer packages in that repo.
> i've got everyt
even though i've enabled the updates-testing repo on my fedora 22
system, i can't seem to update to the newer packages in that repo.
i've got everything set up exactly as it's described here:
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=304760
but even though my updates-testing repo is enabl
Disregard my previous message regarding the TC2 link. Just realized that
since TC1 was never announced, it makes sense to link to the beginning of
the ticket.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Adam Williamson fedoraproject.org> writes:
> Content information, including changes, can be found at
> https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6213 .
Link to TC2 is https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6213#comment:3 .
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https
25 matches
Mail list logo
