As of 23rd of June 2015, Fedora 20 has reached its end of life for
updates and support. No further updates, including security updates,
will be available for Fedora 20. A previous reminder was sent on
27th of May [0].
Fedora 21 will continue to receive updates until approximately one
month after t
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 02:35:49PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> For example, this thread IMHO would have been fine for a
> bugzilla.redhat.com bug report against linux-firmware or kernel with
> something like:
>
> "Hey, since ivtv package was retired I am unable to find 2 firmware
> files I need
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 16:56:30 +0200
poma wrote:
> On 23.06.2015 00:51, Adam Williamson wrote:
> ...
> > The question of what firmwares to include in the Fedora packages is
> > on -topic for maybe the devel@ list or the kernel list, but unless
> > it's
> ...
>
> Wait a minute, Williamson, did you
Compose started at Tue Jun 23 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[amqp]
1:amqp-devel-1.0-1.20150622svn1686756.fc23.noarch requires amqp =
0:1.0-1.20150622svn1686756.fc23
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch
On 23.06.2015 00:51, Adam Williamson wrote:
...
> The question of what firmwares to include in the Fedora packages is on
> -topic for maybe the devel@ list or the kernel list, but unless it's
...
Wait a minute, Williamson, did you mention @kernel and @devel, where the
malicious hordes tried to pr
On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 15:59 +0200, poma wrote:
>
> This hardening crap certainly breaking it
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Harden_All_Packages?rd=Changes
> /Harden_all_packages_with_position-independent_code
Except if you compare the compiler and linker flags in the F21 and F23
builds,
On 22.06.2015 10:44, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-06-21 at 06:10 +0200, poma wrote:
>> If rpm in standard way cannot strip without passing content to debuginfo, so
>> let it be.
>
> It doesn't have something like that as far as I know. Should it?
> It seems that if you aren't going to use
On 23.06.2015 00:51, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 00:33 +0200, poma wrote:
>> On 22.06.2015 23:55, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 17:44 +0200, poma wrote:
Are there any technical or legal issues for all these firmware
files
not to be include
On 23.06.2015 01:27, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 14:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 22:12 +0200, poma wrote:
>>> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide/x86_64/os/images/
>>> boot.iso
>>>
>>> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/6196/101
The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
143
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1467/openstack-glance-2014.1.3-4.fc21
88
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4689/quassel-0.11.0-2.fc21
73
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDO
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
183
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-17089/aeskulap-0.2.2-0.20beta1.fc20,orthanc-0.8.5-2.fc20,dcmtk-3.6.1-1.fc20
138
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1718/389-admin-1.1.38-1.fc20
121
http
The following Fedora 22 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
74
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5878/echoping-6.1-0.beta.r434svn.1.fc22
73
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5948/asterisk-13.3.2-1.fc22
51
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F
12 matches
Mail list logo
