Re: conflict between latest fedora-release and systemd (rawhide)

2015-06-11 Thread Kevin Martin
On 06/10/2015 10:51 PM, Kevin Martin wrote: > On 05/22/2015 10:52 PM, Kevin Martin wrote: >> On 05/22/2015 04:53 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> On Fri, 22 May 2015 16:50:19 -0500 >>> kevin martin wrote: >>> >>> ...snip... >>> Looks like somebody decided to move the 90-default.preset from >>>

Fedora 22 updates-testing report

2015-06-11 Thread updates
The following Fedora 22 Security updates need testing: Age URL 63 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5878/echoping-6.1-0.beta.r434svn.1.fc22 62 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5948/asterisk-13.3.2-1.fc22 41 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F

Fedora 21 updates-testing report

2015-06-11 Thread updates
The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing: Age URL 131 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1467/openstack-glance-2014.1.3-4.fc21 76 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4689/quassel-0.11.0-2.fc21 61 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDO

Fedora 20 updates-testing report

2015-06-11 Thread updates
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing: Age URL 171 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-17089/aeskulap-0.2.2-0.20beta1.fc20,orthanc-0.8.5-2.fc20,dcmtk-3.6.1-1.fc20 126 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1718/389-admin-1.1.38-1.fc20 109 http

Re: conflict between latest fedora-release and systemd (rawhide)

2015-06-11 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 11:45 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 13:38:31 -0400 > Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > It really *can't* be included in the same source RPM, because > > remixes > > wouldn't be able to ship the source, then. > > > > However, there's something to be said for

Re: conflict between latest fedora-release and systemd (rawhide)

2015-06-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 13:38:31 -0400 Stephen Gallagher wrote: > It really *can't* be included in the same source RPM, because remixes > wouldn't be able to ship the source, then. > > However, there's something to be said for including them together in > the same upstream project and generating sep

Re: conflict between latest fedora-release and systemd (rawhide)

2015-06-11 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 11:24 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 11:55:47 -0500 > Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 09:27:18 -0600, > > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:01:04 -0500 > > > Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > > > > > > That change also caused

Re: conflict between latest fedora-release and systemd (rawhide)

2015-06-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 11:55:47 -0500 Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 09:27:18 -0600, > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:01:04 -0500 > >Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > > >> That change also caused problems installing stuff with generic > >> release that depend on lvm2. Fo

Re: conflict between latest fedora-release and systemd (rawhide)

2015-06-11 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 09:27:18 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:01:04 -0500 Bruno Wolff III wrote: That change also caused problems installing stuff with generic release that depend on lvm2. For example you can't build a generic live image that will have anaconda on it for

Re: conflict between latest fedora-release and systemd (rawhide)

2015-06-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:01:04 -0500 Bruno Wolff III wrote: > Looks like somebody decided to move the 90-default.preset from > systemd to the fedora-release package without changing the > systemd package to reflect that and pushing out a new package > (as discussed about a year

Re: conflict between latest fedora-release and systemd (rawhide)

2015-06-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 22:51:11 -0500 Kevin Martin wrote: > Tried getting the koji build but there were too many dependency > issues to install it and I'm still not getting a Rawhide version that > can be installed. Still getting: > > Error: Transaction check error: > file /usr/lib/systemd/syste

Re: conflict between latest fedora-release and systemd (rawhide)

2015-06-11 Thread Bruno Wolff III
Looks like somebody decided to move the 90-default.preset from systemd to the fedora-release package without changing the systemd package to reflect that and pushing out a new package (as discussed about a year ago). That change also caused problems installing stuff with generic release that de

rawhide report: 20150611 changes

2015-06-11 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Thu Jun 11 05:15:04 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [ambari] ambari-server-1.5.1-3.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-server) ambari-server-1.5.1-3.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jerse

Re: dnf - chroot

2015-06-11 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 14:07:34 +0200, poma wrote: > # yum erase dnf > Resolving Dependencies > --> Running transaction check > ---> Package dnf.noarch 0:1.0.0-1.fc23 will be erased > ---> Package dnf-yum.noarch 0:1.0.0-1.fc23 will be erased > --> Processing Dependency: dnf-yum for package: yum-3.4.

Re: Update FC22 - doesn't find root fs and doesn't boot

2015-06-11 Thread poma
On 31.05.2015 20:08, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> And already we have fought for this user's side simplification, but it seems >> developers are very persistent when they do not need to be. > > In the past changes with this effect were reverted. This time they were not. > This generally just affect

Re: Failed to mount /sysroot

2015-06-11 Thread poma
On 09.06.2015 16:47, Harald Hoyer wrote: > On 09.06.2015 15:45, Harald Hoyer wrote: >> On 09.06.2015 15:28, poma wrote: >>> On 09.06.2015 13:39, poma wrote: On 08.06.2015 16:25, poma wrote: > On 08.06.2015 16:23, poma wrote: >> On 03.06.2015 08:13, poma wrote: >>> On 01.06.2015 09: