Re: TC5 DOA i686 dracut-initqueue

2015-02-25 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 23:54 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > I definitely have 32bit TC5 imaged to a USB stick. > sudo dd if=/Users/chris/Downloads/Fedora-Live-Workstation-i686- > 22_Alpha-TC5.iso > of=/dev/rdisk3 bs=512k > > The problem does not occur. Yeah, see my follow-up, it makes sense for it

Re: TC5 DOA i686 dracut-initqueue

2015-02-25 Thread Chris Murphy
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:40 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Adam Williamson > wrote: >> On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 22:15 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:20 PM, Adam Williamson < >>> adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: >>> > On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 20

Re: TC5 DOA i686 dracut-initqueue

2015-02-25 Thread Chris Murphy
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 22:15 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:20 PM, Adam Williamson < >> adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> > On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 20:50 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: >> > > Is this how the known ker

Fedora 21 updates-testing report

2015-02-25 Thread updates
The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing: Age URL 74 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-16833/asterisk-11.14.2-1.fc21 69 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-17195/httpd-2.4.10-15.fc21 66 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-

Fedora 20 updates-testing report

2015-02-25 Thread updates
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing: Age URL 98 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15371/rubygem-actionpack-4.0.0-5.fc20 74 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-16845/resteasy-3.0.6-3.fc20 74 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FED

Re: TC5 DOA i686 dracut-initqueue

2015-02-25 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 21:49 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 22:15 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:20 PM, Adam Williamson < > > adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 20:50 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > Is this how the know

Re: TC5 DOA i686 dracut-initqueue

2015-02-25 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 22:15 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:20 PM, Adam Williamson < > adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 20:50 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > Is this how the known kernel bug manifests? I don't see a link > > > for the kernel bug

Re: TC5 DOA i686 dracut-initqueue

2015-02-25 Thread Chris Murphy
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:20 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 20:50 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: >> Is this how the known kernel bug manifests? I don't see a link for >> the kernel bug so... > > Doesn't look quite the same, and that one's only known to affect lives > (and Atomic, a

Re: TC5 DOA i686 dracut-initqueue

2015-02-25 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 20:50 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > Is this how the known kernel bug manifests? I don't see a link for > the kernel bug so... Doesn't look quite the same, and that one's only known to affect lives (and Atomic, apparently). > TC5 showstopper, dracut-initqueue thousands of cp

TC5 DOA i686 dracut-initqueue

2015-02-25 Thread Chris Murphy
Is this how the known kernel bug manifests? I don't see a link for the kernel bug so... TC5 showstopper, dracut-initqueue thousands of cp will not create hard link messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196481 Direct link to photo of the failure... https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attac

Re: server TC5 images?

2015-02-25 Thread Chris Murphy
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 17:59 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Branched_20150221_Installation?rd=Test_ >> Results:Current_Installation_Test > > Oh - I just saw the subject line. You've got an

gtk i686 boot.iso bug in TC5

2015-02-25 Thread Chris Murphy
anaconda crashes after continuing from language selection screen - i686 boot.iso https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185585 I still run into this with TC5 boot.iso even though the bug is updated saying that Package gtk3-3.15.9-1.fc22 should fix it. I can't tell if that version is actuall

Re: server TC5 images?

2015-02-25 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 17:59 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Branched_20150221_Installation?rd=Test_ > Results:Current_Installation_Test Oh - I just saw the subject line. You've got an old varnish cache link there. You're on the 20150221 nightly p

Re: server TC5 images?

2015-02-25 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 17:59 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Branched_20150221_Installation?rd=Test_ > Results:Current_Installation_Test > > I don't see server images in the test matrix. > > Generic boot is boot.iso, a.k.a. netinstall, which I thi

Re: DNF Migration testing overview

2015-02-25 Thread Chris Murphy
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I don't know where the original message came from. Don't see it in my > folder for this list 5 days ago... > Isn't this the majority of yum users? > > Yes, I use yumex when I am looking for some package that meets a particular > nee

server TC5 images?

2015-02-25 Thread Chris Murphy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Branched_20150221_Installation?rd=Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test I don't see server images in the test matrix. Generic boot is boot.iso, a.k.a. netinstall, which I think eventually we're supposed to get per product versions, correct?

[Test-Announce] Fedora 22 Alpha Test Compose 5 (TC5) Available Now!

2015-02-25 Thread Adam Williamson
As per the Fedora 22 schedule [1], Fedora 22 Alpha Test Compose 5 (TC5) is now available for testing. ** PLEASE NOTE **: This will likely be a short-lived compose - while it was spinning we discovered the likely cause of the bug that causes live image boots to often fail with a kernel crash, an

Re: DNF Migration testing overview

2015-02-25 Thread Robert Moskowitz
I don't know where the original message came from. Don't see it in my folder for this list On 02/25/2015 04:39 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote: On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:38:03PM -0700, Mike Ruckman wrote: Greetings Testers! With the F22 switch from yum to dnf as a package manager, there was a n

Re: DNF Migration testing overview

2015-02-25 Thread Brian C. Lane
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:38:03PM -0700, Mike Ruckman wrote: > Greetings Testers! > > With the F22 switch from yum to dnf as a package manager, there was a need to > figure out what the scope would be for QA testing. Naturally, to define the > scope for a subset, I had to figure out (at least in

Fedora 22 updates-testing report

2015-02-25 Thread updates
The following Fedora 22 Security updates need testing: Age URL 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-2563/compat-libuv010-0.10.34-1.fc22 The following Fedora 22 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: Age URL 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-201

Fedora 21 updates-testing report

2015-02-25 Thread updates
The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing: Age URL 74 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-16833/asterisk-11.14.2-1.fc21 69 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-17195/httpd-2.4.10-15.fc21 65 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-

Fedora 20 updates-testing report

2015-02-25 Thread updates
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing: Age URL 97 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15371/rubygem-actionpack-4.0.0-5.fc20 74 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-16845/resteasy-3.0.6-3.fc20 74 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FED