The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
127
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-11969/krb5-1.11.5-16.fc20
79
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15371/rubygem-actionpack-4.0.0-5.fc20
78
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDOR
The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
80
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15342/rubygem-actionpack-4.1.5-2.fc21
78
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15413/rubygem-sprockets-2.12.1-3.fc21
56
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/u
#457: Anaconda DNF Test Day: 2015-02-12
---+---
Reporter: adamwill | Owner: adamwill
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 22
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
Hi
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> This Friday's build of Anaconda will no longer allow you to use weak
> passwords and click done twice. In order to promote more secureish
> default systems I have increased the password length required to 8
> characters and removed allo
On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 14:10 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> So for a tl;dr summary, the active proposals are:
>
> 1) Add this footnote to the Windows dual-boot criterion: "The
> bootloader entry part of this criterion does not apply when Secure
> Boot is enabled."
>
> 2) Reduce the OS X crit
On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 11:24 -0700, Mike Ruckman wrote:
> Role installation
>
> For at least F22, do we need to have a criterion for installing
> new roles
> with rolekit? Or will "brought to a working configuration" cover
> this enough?
So looking at this as I add the server role requiremen
On Fri, 2015-02-06 at 09:43 -0700, Mike Ruckman wrote:
>
> That sounds like a good idea to me. Do we have a "phase out" SOP
> somewhere for criteria? I'm not finding it readily on the wiki if
> it's there.
We don't, but indeed it does sound like a good idea for things we're
just 'aging out'. T
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 01:38:55PM +0530, Sudhir Dharanendraiah wrote:
>
> On 02/06/2015 04:51 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >>Kickstart Delivery
> >>>
> >>> Not really a criterion change, but we still list a diskette as a
> >>>supported
> >>> delivery mechanism [0]. Should we remove this, or d
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 03:21:53PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 11:24 -0700, Mike Ruckman wrote:
> > Greetings testers!
> >
> > While looking into the affects of the yum/dnf migration I noticed
> > some cleanup
> > opportunities with the release criteria and thought I'd e
# F22 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2015-02-09
# Time: 1700 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
So far this week we've found 1 proposed Alpha blocker as well as 5
proposed for Final. If you want to take a look at the proposed or
accepted blockers, the full list can be foun
Compose started at Fri Feb 6 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[GtkAda3]
GtkAda3-3.8.2-2.fc22.i686 requires libgnat-4.9.so
GtkAda3-gl-3.8.2-2.fc22.i686 requires libgnat-4.9.so
[PackageKit]
PackageKit-1.0.4-1.fc
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 03:03:50PM -0800, Rick Stevens wrote:
> I have to agree with Chris. I have absolutely no issue with the
> installer _warning_ me that the password I chose is (in the INSTALLER's
> opinion) weak. The installer should ABSOLUTELY NOT force me to use some
> arbitrarily obscure
On 02/06/2015 04:51 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Kickstart Delivery
>
> Not really a criterion change, but we still list a diskette as a
>supported
> delivery mechanism [0]. Should we remove this, or do we still
>actively test
> using a diskette for ks delivery?
Hum, not sure. I know I have
13 matches
Mail list logo
