On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 09:53:05PM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-01-30 at 14:03 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > I think the main point is the one nirik made; I don't think the devs
> > agree with your assessment of how significant this is. It's a minor
> > inconvenience; you j
==
#fedora-blocker-review: F22-blocker-review
==
Meeting started by roshi at 17:06:14 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2015-02-02/f22-blocker-review.2015-02-02-
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
122
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-11969/krb5-1.11.5-16.fc20
75
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15371/rubygem-actionpack-4.0.0-5.fc20
73
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDOR
The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
75
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15342/rubygem-actionpack-4.1.5-2.fc21
74
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15413/rubygem-sprockets-2.12.1-3.fc21
52
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/u
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 08:44:03 -0700
Tim Flink wrote:
> I'm not sure what happened but the machine hosting qadevel became
> unresponsive sometime in the last 12 hours and is not recoverable.
>
> I'm going to be rebuilding the host today but until I'm done,
> phabricator and the other services on q
Compose started at Mon Feb 2 05:15:09 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[aeskulap]
aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc22.i686 requires libofstd.so.3.6
aesku