The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
95
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-11969/krb5-1.11.5-16.fc20
47
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15371/rubygem-actionpack-4.0.0-5.fc20
46
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDOR
The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
48
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15342/rubygem-actionpack-4.1.5-2.fc21
46
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15413/rubygem-sprockets-2.12.1-3.fc21
25
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/u
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
437
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19
95
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-12057/krb5-1.11.3-29.fc19
71
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDO
==
#fedora-meeting: Fedora QA meeting
==
Meeting started by adamw at 16:03:07 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-01-05/fedora-qa.2015-01-05-16.03.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-
# First F22 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2015-01-07
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
While it's not the usual time to start blocker reviews, after much
deliberation at today's QA meeting, it was decided to start the blocker
review process earlier than usua
On Mon, 2015-01-05 at 13:19 -0500, Sudhir Dharanendraiah wrote:
> - Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-01-05 at 22:47 +0530, Sudhir Dharanendraiah wrote:
> > > On 01/05/2015 10:18 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > In*theory*, if a bug's rejected as a blocker for one release
> > > > it w
5.1.2015, 20:30, shailendra acharya kirjoitti:
> how can i contribute to fedora.
See here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join
--
Markku Kolkka
markku.kol...@iki.fi
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinf
how can i contribute to fedora. i have skills of c,c++,java,php,python. plz
suggest me asap. i want to do some coding for fedora
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
- Adam Williamson wrote:
| On Mon, 2015-01-05 at 22:47 +0530, Sudhir Dharanendraiah wrote:
| > On 01/05/2015 10:18 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
| > > In*theory*, if a bug's rejected as a blocker for one release it
| > > won't be a blocker for the next release either - remember Fedora
| > > do
On Mon, 2015-01-05 at 22:47 +0530, Sudhir Dharanendraiah wrote:
> On 01/05/2015 10:18 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > In*theory*, if a bug's rejected as a blocker for one release it
> > won't be a blocker for the next release either - remember Fedora
> > doesn't use the RHEL system where bugs can
On 01/05/2015 10:18 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
In*theory*, if a bug's rejected as a blocker for one release it won't
be a blocker for the next release either - remember Fedora doesn't use
the RHEL system where bugs can be dropped as blockers for time
reasons, in the Fedora system blockers are su
On Mon, 2015-01-05 at 19:06 +0530, Sudhir Dharanendraiah wrote:
> On 01/05/2015 07:24 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > roshi and I had a quick chat about the idea of starting up blocker
> > bug review for the F22 cycle this week, in the interests of
> > reducing the number of long meetings lat
On 01/05/2015 07:24 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
roshi and I had a quick chat about the idea of starting up blocker bug
review for the F22 cycle this week, in the interests of reducing the
number of long meetings later in the cycle by starting earlier - so
let's see what folks think of that. I do
Compose started at Mon Jan 5 05:15:02 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[aeskulap]
aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc22.i686 requires libofstd.so.3.6
aesku
14 matches
Mail list logo
