On Fri, 2014-12-05 at 10:29 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 12/05/2014 02:55 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
> > Using directly a simple pm-supend command (without --quirk-vbe-post) in
> > a gnome3 session and pressing afterwards some key, the session directly
> > resumes.
> >
> > If I say power->suspend
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
63
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-11969/krb5-1.11.5-16.fc20
20
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15108/mantis-1.2.17-4.fc20
16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-1537
On Fri, 2014-12-05 at 15:21 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-12-05 at 18:12 -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
> > On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 15:08:48 -0800
> > Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > > It's intentional. See the bug.
> >
> > Yea, I saw the bug and that's what confused me :-).
> >
> > The ini
On Fri, 2014-12-05 at 18:12 -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 15:08:48 -0800
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > It's intentional. See the bug.
>
> Yea, I saw the bug and that's what confused me :-).
>
> The initramfs file already exists. What reason is there for
> a mass rebuild? I did
On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 15:08:48 -0800
Adam Williamson wrote:
> It's intentional. See the bug.
Yea, I saw the bug and that's what confused me :-).
The initramfs file already exists. What reason is there for
a mass rebuild? I didn't see anything in the bug that explained
that.
--
test mailing list
t
On Fri, 2014-12-05 at 18:06 -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 16:14:01 -0600
> Ian Pilcher wrote:
>
> > As I just posted in the bug, the one thing I still don't understand is
> > whether this is intentional (and if so, why) or a bug.
>
> Yea, why should it ever rebuild any initramfs
On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 16:14:01 -0600
Ian Pilcher wrote:
> As I just posted in the bug, the one thing I still don't understand is
> whether this is intentional (and if so, why) or a bug.
Yea, why should it ever rebuild any initramfs for any reason
if they are already there unless it has specific ker
On 12/05/2014 02:02 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074358
>
> It is a pretty bad bit of behaviour, as I wrote in the bug I figure we
> should either disallow shared /boot or try and filter the kernel list at
> least a bit, for F22.
>
Aah. Thanks for
On Fri, 2014-12-05 at 11:23 -0600, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> So after a bit of live CD jiggery pokery, I was able to run through an
> F21 RC5 installation. I installed it in a separate logical volume,
> alongside my existing F20 installation. /boot is a shared ext4
> partition on top of my IMSM RAID v
On 12/05/2014 02:55 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
Using directly a simple pm-supend command (without --quirk-vbe-post) in
a gnome3 session and pressing afterwards some key, the session directly
resumes.
If I say power->suspend in gnome-tweak-tool and then press the power
button, the machine suspend
On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 11:23:12 -0600
Ian Pilcher wrote:
> Am I crazy? Anyone else seen this? Expected behavior?
Yep. Happened to someone here at work with CentOS 7 I believe.
One of the many reasons I would never in a million years
use a shared /boot :-).
If I want to multi-boot, I use a stand a
So after a bit of live CD jiggery pokery, I was able to run through an
F21 RC5 installation. I installed it in a separate logical volume,
alongside my existing F20 installation. /boot is a shared ext4
partition on top of my IMSM RAID volume. I still use GRUB legacy, so I
told anaconda not to ins
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 11:51:41 -0500,
Gene Czarcinski wrote:
I realize that once Fedora 21 is released, that some of the packages
in the "current" updates-testing will be moved to updates, others will
be discarded as OBE and the rest left in updates-testing for further
testing. I realize
Since it is not December 9 yet, should be testing with all the updates
from updates-testing? I am talking about true testing here. Any
install with RC5 only will be left in that state until general
availability when updates will be valid.
I realize that once Fedora 21 is released, that some
On Fri, 2014-12-05 at 11:33 -0200, Fernando Lozano wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I installed F21 Beta from the Workstation (live) DVD on a computer I
> don't mind to reformat a few times.
>
> If I do yum update do I get RC5?
>
> Next week, when the final release is out, will yum update suffice?
>
Yes. A yu
Hi,
I installed F21 Beta from the Workstation (live) DVD on a computer I
don't mind to reformat a few times.
If I do yum update do I get RC5?
Next week, when the final release is out, will yum update suffice?
[]s, Fernando Lozano
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscri
Compose started at Fri Dec 5 05:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for i386
--
[3Depict]
3Depict-0.0.16-3.fc22.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.2.0
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[cab]
cab-0.1.
Compose started at Fri Dec 5 07:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[avro]
avro-mapred-1.7.5-9.fc21.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce
avro-mapred-1.7.5-9.fc21.noarch requires hadoop-client
[openstack-nova]
openstac
Using directly a simple pm-supend command (without --quirk-vbe-post) in
a gnome3 session and pressing afterwards some key, the session directly
resumes.
If I say power->suspend in gnome-tweak-tool and then press the power
button, the machine suspends, but if afterwards I press some key (for
resum
On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 16:30:51 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Example: docker-io-1.3.2-2.fc20, a CVE fix, is broken, DOA. Any earlier
> build is insecure. docker-io-1.3.2-4.fc20 works fine. However, we have
> docker-io-1.3.2-2.fc21 in F21 stable (as far as I've been able to tell
> it works fine on
20 matches
Mail list logo
