Hi,
Can you instruct me in how you installed the nVidia drivers?
- Original Message -
From: "Joerg Lechner"
To:,
Cc:
Sent:Tue, 11 Nov 2014 02:18:35 -0500
Subject:Re: F21 Installation Issues - Installation destination
partitioning
Hi,
on my laptop there is a Nvidia Geforce 840M (Acer
Hi,
on my laptop there is a Nvidia Geforce 840M (Acer Aspire E15, E5 571G). I
didn't have any problems with the grafics drivers so far. Currently running F21
Final TC1.
Kind Regards
-Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-
Von: Bidski
An: test
Verschickt: Mo, 10 Nov 2014 10:05 pm
Betreff:
On 11/10/2014 10:42 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/10/2014 06:06 PM, Frank wrote:
I installed 21 beta today from the live cd and ran into a couple of
(minor) problems. I guess because I had booted the live cd in safe mode
(trying to solve another problem) when I installed it from the desktop I
en
On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 21:06 -0500, Frank wrote:
> I installed 21 beta today from the live cd and ran into a couple of
> (minor) problems. I guess because I had booted the live cd in safe mode
> (trying to solve another problem) when I installed it from the desktop I
> ended up with 1280x1024 res
On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 05:29 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
> I was about to mention the same, Fedora UEFI dual-boot requires a lot
> of manual tweaking at the moment, and I guess it's not something that
> can be changed and properly tested in a few weeks.
For me it actually works OK in a smoke test wi
On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 05:13 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > It makes sense for Graphical and Text to not be split between i686,
> > x86_64 and UEFI, for sure. And it makes sense for Basic Video Driver to
> > have probably x86 BIOS / x86 UEFI split, indeed. We should consider the
> > other tests in d
On 11/10/2014 06:06 PM, Frank wrote:
I installed 21 beta today from the live cd and ran into a couple of
(minor) problems. I guess because I had booted the live cd in safe mode
(trying to solve another problem) when I installed it from the desktop I
ended up with 1280x1024 resolution. My monitor
On Fedora 21, Gnome desktop, the Display configuration tool has regressed:
I'm unable to switch my external monitor to be Primary, and the laptop
monitor to be Secondary. I also can't disable the external monitor as long
as it is plugged in via HDMI. I.e. when I try to change those settings,
and
I installed 21 beta today from the live cd and ran into a couple of
(minor) problems. I guess because I had booted the live cd in safe mode
(trying to solve another problem) when I installed it from the desktop I
ended up with 1280x1024 resolution. My monitor is capable of 1650x900
but I can't
On 10.11.2014 21:33, Jared K. Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>
>> - Under F21, suspend seems to work fine, but there is no response to the
>>power button (or any other input). One has to hold the power button
>>until the firmware gets fed up and po
Has anyone had success installing the nVidia drivers in F21 yet?
I am meeting some strange issues following the instructions for
installing them in F20. Including this page
(https://www.dropbox.com/s/9de7q9llhlamf32/IMG_20141110_192627.jpg?dl=0)
displaying while booting after installing the drive
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> - Under F21, suspend seems to work fine, but there is no response to the
>power button (or any other input). One has to hold the power button
>until the firmware gets fed up and powers things down hard.
>
I had the same problem
The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
4
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-13837/konversation-1.5.1-1.fc21
3
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-14461/python-requests-kerberos-0.6-1.fc21
0
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/upd
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
380
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19
192 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5896/nrpe-2.15-2.fc19
143
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-20
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
192 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5897/nrpe-2.15-2.fc20
61
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10451/geary-0.6.3-1.fc20
61
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10468/icecr
# F21 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2014-11-12
# Time: 16:00 UTC (11:00 EST, 08:00 PST)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
It's that time of the week again! Last week we had 15 proposed blockers, which
we managed to get down to 4 or so. This week we have 11 to go through. Also
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 08:28:14 -0600
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 11/10/2014 12:54 AM, upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> >
> > 86https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9474/pipelight-0.2.7.3-3.fc20
>
> Could someone remove this from testing? The package has been removed
> from
On 11/10/2014 12:54 AM, upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
86https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9474/pipelight-0.2.7.3-3.fc20
Could someone remove this from testing? The package has been removed from
Fedora. There is also an F19 build.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedor
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 04:19:17 -0800, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> I tried installing from a flash drive of
> Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-21_Beta.iso.
> I tried a number of package selections based on either Creative and
> Development
> or Xfce. All failed with software dependencies.
>
> Is t
Compose started at Mon Nov 10 05:15:04 UTC 2014
Broken deps for i386
--
[3Depict]
3Depict-0.0.16-3.fc22.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.2.0
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[audtty]
audtt
> > ===
> >
> > When installing to a system containing an existing installation of
> > either the same Fedora release or either of the two previous releases,
> > the installer must configure the new installation's bootloader such that
> > it can successfully boot the existing installation.
> >
>
> > 1. Testcase_Anaconda_User_Interface_Basic_Video_Driver was changed to
> > a generic x86 test. In this case, it is problematic, because BIOS and
> > UEFI fallback video driver are completely different code paths. I have
> > a personal experience from that past when one of those worked and the
>
I guess that there are lots and lots people at Red Hat with Lenovo
laptops (few or them must be X1 and T440) so this is trivial for them
to test. Guys/galls please help us out.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Instead of opening a new thread I'll just jump in here because I have
Lenovo T440s and same or at least similar issue.
I tried doing suspend/resume on both Fedora 21 Alpha and now on Beta
and it is not working on T440s. When I read Jonathans comment I
immediately recognised same issue that I have
24 matches
Mail list logo
