poma composed on 2014-10-16 18:52 (UTC-0400):
> Wishful thinking will get you nowhere.
In openSUSE it's not wishful thinking. I do a software search. I see what I
want. I enable that repo if it isn't already enabled, and I install, just a
few minutes.
> I gave you a direct instruction to make th
On 16.10.2014 22:53, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> Michael Larabel, the principal author of Phoronix.com, has
> written about his positive experiences with Fedora 21.
>
Since when tabloids are reference for anything? :)
poma
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
On 17.10.2014 00:17, Felix Miata wrote:
> poma composed on 2014-10-16 23:44 (UTC+0200):
>
>> You call yourself a tester, a tester which is unable comprehended core
>> principles of testing.
>> Dude are you kidding me? :)
>
> It's not a necessary prerequisite to testing to subscribe to any partic
gt;>
>>> cd ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES
>>> git clone http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/git/xorg-x11-drv-intel.git
>>> cd xorg-x11-drv-intel
>>> ./make-git-snapshot.sh
>>> ./make-intel-gpu-tools-snapshot.sh
>>> cp xorg-x11-drv-intel.spec xorg-x11-drv-in
poma composed on 2014-10-16 23:44 (UTC+0200):
> You call yourself a tester, a tester which is unable comprehended core
> principles of testing.
> Dude are you kidding me? :)
It's not a necessary prerequisite to testing to subscribe to any particular
definition of test. I test what makes sense fo
On 16.10.2014 20:54, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 10/16/2014 01:52 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
>> This is even more confusing, since I thought I made explicit that the
>> upstream fix is in git3.0.0, not 2.99.9##.
>
> There is no "3.0.0" yet. Anyone versioning it that way is wrong.
>
The force is
t; cd xorg-x11-drv-intel
>> ./make-git-snapshot.sh
>> ./make-intel-gpu-tools-snapshot.sh
>> cp xorg-x11-drv-intel.spec xorg-x11-drv-intel.spec.orig
>> perl -i -p -e 's/#define gitdate 20120907/%define gitdate 20141016/'
>> xorg-x11-drv-intel.spec
>>
...
Cleanup: grubby-8.35-4.fc21.x86_64
440/441
Cleanup: libmwaw-.3.2-2.fc21.x86_64
441/441
*** Error in `/sbin/grubby': free(): invalid pointer: 0x
Yep. I installed F21 branched even before the alpha
was released on my desktop at work to check out the
support for my video card (which limps in f20 with
the random rawhide bits from rpmfusion I needed),
and it works fine as near as I can tell. No problems
that I've noticed when testing it and the
On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 10:47 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 09:53 -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 17:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 11:21 -0400, Stephen G
Michael Larabel, the principal author of Phoronix.com, has
written about his positive experiences with Fedora 21.
Meanwhile, Fedora 21 has been running omen.com
with updates since September 14 with good stability.
--
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com www.omen.com
Developer of Industri
Michael Cronenworth composed on 2014-10-16 13:54 (UTC-0500):
> Felix Miata wrote:
>> This is even more confusing, since I thought I made explicit that the
>> upstream fix is in git3.0.0, not 2.99.9##.
> There is no "3.0.0" yet. Anyone versioning it that way is wrong.
I don't see how git#.0 is m
Kamil Paral composed on 2014-10-16 09:32 (UTC-0400):
>> My Google foo is getting me nowhere fast. I want to follow-up on
>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85016#c4 but need an
>> xorg-x11-drv-intel git 3.0.0 version to do it. How can I find out if and
>> where such an rpm package exi
On 10/16/2014 01:52 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
This is even more confusing, since I thought I made explicit that the
upstream fix is in git3.0.0, not 2.99.9##.
There is no "3.0.0" yet. Anyone versioning it that way is wrong.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://
.fedoraproject.org/cgit/xorg-x11-drv-intel.git/plain
> cd ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES
> git clone http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/git/xorg-x11-drv-intel.git
> cd xorg-x11-drv-intel
> ./make-git-snapshot.sh
> ./make-intel-gpu-tools-snapshot.sh
> cp xorg-x11-drv-intel.spec xorg-x11-drv-intel.s
RCES
git clone http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/git/xorg-x11-drv-intel.git
cd xorg-x11-drv-intel
./make-git-snapshot.sh
./make-intel-gpu-tools-snapshot.sh
cp xorg-x11-drv-intel.spec xorg-x11-drv-intel.spec.orig
perl -i -p -e 's/#define gitdate 20120907/%define gitdate 20141016/'
xorg-x11-drv
> My Google foo is getting me nowhere fast. I want to follow-up on
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85016#c4 but need an
> xorg-x11-drv-intel git 3.0.0 version to do it. How can I find out if and
> where such an rpm package exists for F21 and/or F22?
$ pkgwat releases xorg-x11-drv-in
> Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 04:27:58 -0400
> From: mrma...@earthlink.net
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: ?howto?: find needed package in not configured repository -> intel
> video driver
>
> My Google foo is getting me nowhere fast. I want to follow-up on
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/
Compose started at Thu Oct 16 05:15:05 UTC 2014
Broken deps for i386
--
[3Depict]
3Depict-0.0.16-3.fc22.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.2.0
[Agda]
ghc-Agda-2.3.2.2-5.fc22.i686 requires libHSterminfo-0.3.2.5-ghc7.6.3.so
ghc-Ag
Compose started at Thu Oct 16 07:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc21.1.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) =
0:1.1.6-2.fc21
[audtty]
audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.armv7hl requires libaudcli
My Google foo is getting me nowhere fast. I want to follow-up on
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85016#c4 but need an
xorg-x11-drv-intel git 3.0.0 version to do it. How can I find out if and
where such an rpm package exists for F21 and/or F22?
There's a link on
https://fedoraproject.o
On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 12:17 -0400, Chris Murphy wrote:
> This is confusing. I'm trying to find the version of python-blivet used by
> netinst, on which rpm -q doesn't work because the "package is not installed".
> I used to go look at e.g.
> https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases
On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 07:36 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi all F21 testers,
>
> after having updated to procps-ng-3.3.10-3.fc21.x86_64, the new top
> command has some changed default behaviour (red lines, process tree
> display),...
>
> Additionally, the top command shows weird memory usage va
23 matches
Mail list logo
