Fedora 19 updates-testing report

2014-10-15 Thread updates
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing: Age URL 355 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19 167 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5896/nrpe-2.15-2.fc19 118 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-20

Fedora 20 updates-testing report

2014-10-15 Thread updates
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing: Age URL 167 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5897/nrpe-2.15-2.fc20 61 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9474/pipelight-0.2.7.3-3.fc20 36 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10451/

Fedora 21 updates-testing report

2014-10-15 Thread updates
The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing: Age URL 7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-12417/openstack-cinder-2014.1.3-1.fc21 5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-12574/python-django-horizon-2014.1.3-1.fc21 5 https://admin.fedoraprojec

Re: "Package sets" release criterion: what to do with it?

2014-10-15 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 14:29 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 06:25:46PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hi, folks. I'm checking the release criteria again for Fedora.next > > compatibility, and there's an Alpha criterion with obvious issues: > > > > "Package sets > > > >

2014-10-15 @ 16:00 UTC ** Blocker Review Meeting Minutes

2014-10-15 Thread Mike Ruckman
== #fedora-blocker-review: F21-blocker-review == Meeting started by roshi at 16:04:23 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2014-10-15/f21-blocker-review.2014-10-15-

finding install media SRPMS versions

2014-10-15 Thread Chris Murphy
This is confusing. I'm trying to find the version of python-blivet used by netinst, on which rpm -q doesn't work because the "package is not installed". I used to go look at e.g. https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/20/Fedora/source/SRPMS/p/ and I'd see the full package name i

Re: Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-21/rawhide-20141012 - missing firewall-applet

2014-10-15 Thread poma
On 13.10.2014 16:42, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > FYI, there was not any intention of removing firewall-applet from the > Xfce spin. > > It could be related to comps changes or to my trying to prune space a > while back (although I don't think so). > > If you would like to be productive, can you see wh

Re: Blocker bugs app links to F19 release criteria

2014-10-15 Thread Tim Flink
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 19:20:59 -0500 Michael Catanzaro wrote: > The blocker bugs app [1] seems to have hardcoded links to outdated > release criteria. Not sure where to file a bug > > [1] https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/propose_bug Wow, that's been around for a while :) Thanks for l

netinst "Software Selection" incorrect

2014-10-15 Thread Chris Murphy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146306 Seems to me this should be a release blocking bug, but I'm not sure of an applicable criterion. Still happens with Fedora-Workstation-netinst-x86_64-21_Beta_TC3.iso Chris Murphy-- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe:

Re: F21: Changed behaviour of the "top" command

2014-10-15 Thread Ed Greshko
On 10/15/14 17:56, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 10/15/14 16:32, Joachim Backes wrote: >> Maybe, the free memory part is marked by the red part of the bar, and >> the orange part signals the used part of the memory? > Actually, if you do "man top" it has all the information. Just don't > have time t

Btrfs filesystem corruption with kernel 3.17.0

2014-10-15 Thread Juan Orti Alcaine
After some days of usage I have experienced filesystem corruption with btrfs. There must be a bug with read-only snapshots in this kernel, so be careful. Give a look to: http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg38092.html http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org

rawhide report: 20141015 changes

2014-10-15 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Wed Oct 15 05:15:05 UTC 2014 Broken deps for i386 -- [3Depict] 3Depict-0.0.16-3.fc22.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.2.0 [Agda] ghc-Agda-2.3.2.2-5.fc22.i686 requires libHSterminfo-0.3.2.5-ghc7.6.3.so ghc-Ag

F-21 Branched report: 20141015 changes

2014-10-15 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Wed Oct 15 07:15:03 UTC 2014 Broken deps for armhfp -- [PyQuante] PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc21.1.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) = 0:1.1.6-2.fc21 [audtty] audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.armv7hl requires libaudcli

Re: F21: Changed behaviour of the "top" command

2014-10-15 Thread Ed Greshko
On 10/15/14 16:32, Joachim Backes wrote: > Maybe, the free memory part is marked by the red part of the bar, and > the orange part signals the used part of the memory? Actually, if you do "man top" it has all the information. Just don't have time to read it at the moment. -- If you can't l

Re: F21: Changed behaviour of the "top" command

2014-10-15 Thread Joachim Backes
On 10/15/2014 08:43 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 10/15/14 13:36, Joachim Backes wrote: >> Hi all F21 testers, >> >> after having updated to procps-ng-3.3.10-3.fc21.x86_64, the new top >> command has some changed default behaviour (red lines, process tree >> display),... >> >> Additionally, the top co