Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 21 Beta Test Compose 3 (TC3) Available Now!

2014-10-10 Thread Joerg Lechner
There is a problem and I don't know if it is my fault or not. I have downloaded Fedora-Live-Workstation-x86_64-21_Beta-TC3.iso2014-10-10 01:53 1.3G built with the Fedora Live usb creator a loadable iso on a stick. But I can not load this live image. This procedure I did 2 times, with the

Re: test request: kernel 3.17 for F21

2014-10-10 Thread Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
On 10/09/2014 01:39 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: ... Not unexpectedly, 3.17 broke the Nvidia driver from rpmfusion on my office machine. Given how poorly Nouveau supports some Nvidia cards, this could be an issue. I reinstalled FC21 on my office machine and updated to get the 3.17 kernel

[Test-Announce] Fedora 21 Beta Test Compose 3 (TC3) Available Now!

2014-10-10 Thread Adam Williamson
As per the Fedora 21 schedule [1], Fedora 21 Beta Test Compose 3 (TC3) is now available for testing. Content information, including changes, can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6010#comment:4 . Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and testing

Re: cc std=c11 breakage in Fedora 21

2014-10-10 Thread Eric Blake
On 10/10/2014 02:37 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: > > On 10/10/2014 07:45 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 07:23:02AM -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: >>> Why does this program fragment fail to compile if a C standard >>> is specified? I compiles without complaint with a

Re: cc std=c11 breakage in Fedora 21

2014-10-10 Thread Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
On 10/10/2014 07:45 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 07:23:02AM -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: Why does this program fragment fail to compile if a C standard is specified? I compiles without complaint with a simple cc -c qq.c You chose a strict conformance mode, in which

Fedora 21 updates-testing report

2014-10-10 Thread updates
The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing: Age URL 27 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10767/squid-3.4.7-2.fc21 13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-11677/rubygem-bundler-1.7.3-1.fc21 6 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-20

Fedora 20 updates-testing report

2014-10-10 Thread updates
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing: Age URL 161 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5897/nrpe-2.15-2.fc20 55 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9474/pipelight-0.2.7.3-3.fc20 30 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10451/

Fedora 19 updates-testing report

2014-10-10 Thread updates
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing: Age URL 349 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19 161 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5896/nrpe-2.15-2.fc19 112 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-20

discussion on Fedora Council Engineering representative

2014-10-10 Thread Matthew Miller
Spamming many lists to make sure this doesn't go unnoticed. (In case my accidentally posting to both devel and devel-announce separately doesn't do it.) Please see the thread titled "Engineering Representiatve for the new Fedora Council" on the devel list — this affects and should have the input o

Re: cc std=c11 breakage in Fedora 21

2014-10-10 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 07:23:02AM -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: > Why does this program fragment fail to compile if a C standard > is specified? I compiles without complaint with a simple cc -c qq.c You chose a strict conformance mode, in which sys/stat.h doesn't provide those. You need e

Re: Transaction history when updated using gnome-software

2014-10-10 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 01:36:46PM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > The value is used here: > https://github.com/hughsie/PackageKit/blob/master/backends/hif/pk-backend-hif.c#L2934 > -- nothing ever changes the default value. If you can give me a good > use case on why this should be configurable, the

cc std=c11 breakage in Fedora 21

2014-10-10 Thread Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
Why does this program fragment fail to compile if a C standard is specified? I compiles without complaint with a simple cc -c qq.c cat qq.c /* cc -c -std=c11 qq.c This file (qq.c) compiles without the -std=c11 flag or -std=c89 or std=c90 or any std= I tried, even -ansi qq.c: In

Re: os

2014-10-10 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 18:56 +0530, shailendra acharya wrote: > hello folks, > i am shailendra, currently in final year of btech i > want to make new os for my project. plz show me path how to do it. i > searched on google no. of times but there is only motivational speech > are wr

os

2014-10-10 Thread shailendra acharya
hello folks, i am shailendra, currently in final year of btech i want to make new os for my project. plz show me path how to do it. i searched on google no. of times but there is only motivational speech are written or may be i couldn't find the correct way. i hope u will show me

Re: Transaction history when updated using gnome-software

2014-10-10 Thread Richard Hughes
On 10 October 2014 13:21, Ankur Sinha wrote: > I thought so. Is there a place one could add things like installonly > then? If not, what does it do by default? I mean, how did it decide that > I had five kernels and installing a new one, making it six, implied > removing three older ones: The val

Re: Transaction history when updated using gnome-software

2014-10-10 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 11:50 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 10 October 2014 11:24, Ankur Sinha wrote: > >> Try 'pkcon get-transactions'. > > Hrm - that works, obviously. > > Or if you install gnome-packagekit, gpk-log > > > Follow up question - what config file would g-s follow? Does it use >

Re: Transaction history when updated using gnome-software

2014-10-10 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Richard Hughes wrote: > No, libhif uses the yumdb as well. I've got no idea why dnf doesn't > use the yumdb as it seems to be the same format but in a different > place. > yumdb is a private yum data, so dnf has its own one, so dnf don't mess up anything for yum

Re: Transaction history when updated using gnome-software

2014-10-10 Thread Richard Hughes
On 10 October 2014 12:27, Tim Lauridsen wrote: > So PackageKit, dnf & yum all have there own package transaction history. No, libhif uses the yumdb as well. I've got no idea why dnf doesn't use the yumdb as it seems to be the same format but in a different place. Richard -- test mailing list te

rawhide report: 20141010 changes

2014-10-10 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Fri Oct 10 05:15:05 UTC 2014 Broken deps for i386 -- [Agda] ghc-Agda-2.3.2.2-5.fc22.i686 requires libHSterminfo-0.3.2.5-ghc7.6.3.so ghc-Agda-2.3.2.2-5.fc22.i686 requires libHShaskeline-0.7.0.3-ghc7.6.3.so

F-21 Branched report: 20141010 changes

2014-10-10 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Fri Oct 10 07:15:02 UTC 2014 Broken deps for armhfp -- [PyQuante] PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc21.1.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) = 0:1.1.6-2.fc21 [audtty] audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.armv7hl requires libaudcli

Re: Transaction history when updated using gnome-software

2014-10-10 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Joonas Sarajärvi wrote: > 2014-10-10 13:50 GMT+03:00 Richard Hughes : > >> Follow up question - what config file would g-s follow? Does it use > >> yum.conf? I had the install only limit set to 5 in dnf.conf, not in > >> yum.conf, and g-s removed 3 of my older ker

Re: Transaction history when updated using gnome-software

2014-10-10 Thread Richard Hughes
On 10 October 2014 12:00, Joonas Sarajärvi wrote: > 2014-10-10 13:50 GMT+03:00 Richard Hughes : >> No, it doesn't use yum at all. > What does it use? The librpm, hawkey and librepo libraries. We don't want to use DNF itself as that would mean going from C->python->C for a low latency parallel des

Re: Transaction history when updated using gnome-software

2014-10-10 Thread Joonas Sarajärvi
2014-10-10 13:50 GMT+03:00 Richard Hughes : >> Follow up question - what config file would g-s follow? Does it use >> yum.conf? I had the install only limit set to 5 in dnf.conf, not in >> yum.conf, and g-s removed 3 of my older kernels. > > No, it doesn't use yum at all. What does it use? http:/

Re: Transaction history when updated using gnome-software

2014-10-10 Thread Richard Hughes
On 10 October 2014 11:24, Ankur Sinha wrote: >> Try 'pkcon get-transactions'. > Hrm - that works, obviously. Or if you install gnome-packagekit, gpk-log > Follow up question - what config file would g-s follow? Does it use > yum.conf? I had the install only limit set to 5 in dnf.conf, not in > y

Re: What package is causing these traces?

2014-10-10 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 10:54 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > Could someone please look at the traces and tell me what > package may be causing them? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151407 filed -- Thanks, Warm regards, Ankur (FranciscoD) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Joi

Re: Transaction history when updated using gnome-software

2014-10-10 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 03:10 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 10:52 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Where can I find the transaction history of an update that was used > > gnome-software? > > Try 'pkcon get-transactions'. Hrm - that works, obviously. Follow up

Re: Grub boot or der

2014-10-10 Thread poma
On 10.10.2014 11:42, Adam Williamson wrote: > The official fix likely won't fix already-installed systems, only future > installs. > ain't a problem we can't fix, coz we can do it in da mix poma -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.or

Re: Transaction history when updated using gnome-software

2014-10-10 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 10:52 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hello, > > Where can I find the transaction history of an update that was used > gnome-software? Try 'pkcon get-transactions'. > Given that updates using software cannot undone, should we maybe limit > gnome-software only to packages in th

What package is causing these traces?

2014-10-10 Thread Ankur Sinha
Hello, After a recent upgrade, I couldn't get the GUI to come up - the console seemed to work fine. This is what I've managed to collect from journalctl. Could someone please look at the traces and tell me what package may be causing them? I think a couple of mesa related packages were updated fr

Transaction history when updated using gnome-software

2014-10-10 Thread Ankur Sinha
Hello, Where can I find the transaction history of an update that was used gnome-software? This is on F21, and it should probably be using the hawkey backend. My system wouldn't come up after an update and I need to see what packages were updated to narrow down the misbehaving package :) Given th

Re: Grub boot order -

2014-10-10 Thread Paul Cartwright
On 10/10/2014 04:55 AM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: > > On 10/10/14 04:29, Christopher Meng wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Bob >> Goodwin wrote: >>> > >>> > I now have three kernels listed in grub. What is the correct way >>> to make it >>> > boot from the newest? I change

Re: test request: kernel 3.17 for F21

2014-10-10 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 10:37 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 10 October 2014 10:26, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > I've been running the 3.17 series for a while now - I'm on rawhide > > nodebug. I haven't seen any issues at all yet. They seem to work quite > > well. > > Same here, no issues experienced.

Re: Grub boot order -

2014-10-10 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 04:55 -0400, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: > On 10/10/14 04:29, Christopher Meng wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Bob Goodwin > > wrote: > >> > > >> > I now have three kernels listed in grub. What is the correct way to make > >> > it > >> > boot from t

Re: test request: kernel 3.17 for F21

2014-10-10 Thread Richard Hughes
On 10 October 2014 10:26, Ankur Sinha wrote: > I've been running the 3.17 series for a while now - I'm on rawhide > nodebug. I haven't seen any issues at all yet. They seem to work quite > well. Same here, no issues experienced. Richard. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsu

Re: test request: kernel 3.17 for F21

2014-10-10 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 16:00 -0400, Jared K. Smith wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 2:25 AM, Adam Williamson > wrote: > Hi, folks! It'd be great if people could test this kernel: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kernel-3.17.0-301.fc21 > I've been running the k

Re: Grub boot order -

2014-10-10 Thread Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
On 10/10/14 04:29, Christopher Meng wrote: On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote: > > I now have three kernels listed in grub. What is the correct way to make it > boot from the newest? I changed GRUB_DEFAULT=saved to GRUB_DEFAULT=0. That > moved it from the oldest to the second,

Re: Grub boot order -

2014-10-10 Thread Christopher Meng
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote: > > I now have three kernels listed in grub. What is the correct way to make it > boot from the newest? I changed GRUB_DEFAULT=saved to GRUB_DEFAULT=0. That > moved it from the oldest to the second, not the latest as I expected. I did > run grub2

Grub boot order -

2014-10-10 Thread Bob Goodwin
I now have three kernels listed in grub. What is the correct way to make it boot from the newest? I changed GRUB_DEFAULT=saved to GRUB_DEFAULT=0. That moved it from the oldest to the second, not the latest as I expected. I did run grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg and as I said I saw a c