On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 22:42 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 17:40 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > I have now updated this in the Fedora 21 Final Release Criteria:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Fedora_21_Final_Release_Criteria&diff=390099&oldid=374841
>
>
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 17:40 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I have now updated this in the Fedora 21 Final Release Criteria:
> https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Fedora_21_Final_Release_Criteria&diff=390099&oldid=374841
I think the proposed OS X criterion is also uncontroversial:
"The in
On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 22:38 -0600, Mike Ruckman wrote:
> Hello fellow Fedorans! I told cloud@ that I would work on some criteria to go
> over, and here's what I have so far. These are pretty rough, but I think
> they're servicable enough for the time being. There are only two I've thought
> of for
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 20:41 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> "All applications installed by default in Fedora Workstation must comply
> with each MUST and MUST NOT guideline in the Applications and Launchers
> policy." [1] (This is already mentioned at the very bottom of the
> policy.)
I have now
On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 14:52 -0400, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Sep 29, 2014, at 3:32 AM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> >
> > 1. "The installer must be able to install into free space alongside an
> > existing clean Windows installation and install a bootloader which can
> > boot into both Windows and
On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 19:06 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 17:19 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hi, folks. So, I drew up a rough draft of the Server release criteria
> > for Beta and Final as I suggest they might be. We could kick it around
> > at tomorrow's meeting if des
On 10/01/2014 12:39 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 10/01/2014 08:43 AM, Andre Robatino wrote:
>> As per the Fedora 21 schedule [1], Fedora 21 Beta Test Compose 1
>> (TC1) is now available for testing.
>
> PXE Booting 21_Beta_TC1/Server on physical hardware with 1GB RAM. System
> appears to be r
On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 23:48 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 17:29 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hi, folks. So as I've been playing with relval, I've been wondering why
> > we have 'TC' and 'RC' results page categories. That is, we have a
> > top-level 'Test Results' catego
# F21 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2014-10-03
# Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Towards the end of today's blocker review meeting, we decided it would be good
for us to have a another meeting this week to deal with the unusually large
==
#fedora-blocker-review: F21-blocker-review
==
Meeting started by roshi at 15:58:52 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2014-10-01/f21-blocker-review.2014-10-01-
On 10/01/2014 08:43 AM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> As per the Fedora 21 schedule [1], Fedora 21 Beta Test Compose 1
> (TC1) is now available for testing.
PXE Booting 21_Beta_TC1/Server on physical hardware with 1GB RAM. System
appears to be running out of memory - but it seems to be all in use by
As per the Fedora 21 schedule [1], Fedora 21 Beta Test Compose 1
(TC1) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6010 . Please see the following
pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and testing
instructio
On 09/30/2014 10:48 AM, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
Yumex should work fine in F21, could be a problem with Policykit,
please make a bugzilla report and I will help you track down the issue.
My plan is to replace yumex 3.0.x, with the 4.x version based on dnf
at F22,
http://www.yumex.dk/2014/09/yum
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 10:31 AM, miguel wrote:
> I have a small problem. When you boot the pc, which selects the kernel
> is not the last, that is, the newest, but selects a lower each time you
> install a kernel update.
>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F21_bugs#Default_boot_menu_.28grub.
I have a small problem. When you boot the pc, which selects the kernel
is not the last, that is, the newest, but selects a lower each time you
install a kernel update. I'm talking about the kernel 3.16.200 and
3.16.300 and between these two, grub select the bottom. I know it's
silly, but I come fro
15 matches
Mail list logo
