The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9882/squid-3.4.7-1.fc21
0
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9919/thunderbird-enigmail-1.7.2-1.fc21
The following Fedora 21 Critical Path updates have
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
308
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19
120 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5896/nrpe-2.15-2.fc19
71
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-20
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
120 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5897/nrpe-2.15-2.fc20
70
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-7551/asterisk-11.10.2-2.fc20
69
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-7613/pe
The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
0
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9882/squid-3.4.7-1.fc21
0
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9919/thunderbird-enigmail-1.7.2-1.fc21
The following Fedora 21 Critical Path updates have
Broken deps for i386
--
[APLpy]
APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs
[PyKDE]
PyKDE-3.16.6-14.fc20.i686 requires sip-api(10) >= 0:10.0
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc22.1.i686 requires libint(x86-32) =
0:1.1.
On 08/29/2014 01:58 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2014-08-24 at 19:57 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
On 08/24/2014 07:50 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/25/14 10:11, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
For the third or fourth time the hard disk system has crashed at omen.com
since putting vari
Compose started at Fri Aug 29 07:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[APLpy]
APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs
[PyKDE]
PyKDE-3.16.6-14.fc20.armv7hl requires sip-api(10) >= 0:10.0
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-
On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 04:24 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> Even though luc has so many issues, and even though our Fedora wiki
> guide [1] no longer lists is as the first option, I had the notion
> that it was already *the tool* recommended by default. Because
> fedoraproject.org only links to our do
Hi, folks. One of my sidelines is maintaining the Fedora ownCloud
package. Today I submitted ownCloud 7.0.2 as an update for Fedora 20;
this is a major version update, the previous package was 6.0.4. I'd
really appreciate it if folks could test and see if it works for them.
https://fedoraproject.o
On Sun, 2014-08-24 at 19:57 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> On 08/24/2014 07:50 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > On 08/25/14 10:11, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> >> For the third or fourth time the hard disk system has crashed at omen.com
> >> since putting various incarnations of Fedora 21 on it.
On Sun, 2014-08-24 at 12:23 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Windows
> ===
>
> Our current release criterion is:
>
> "The installer must be able to install into free space alongside an
> existing clean Windows installation and, when performing a BIOS (not
> UEFI) installation, install a boo
On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 10:24 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Aug 19, 2014, at 10:07 AM, Tim Flink wrote:
> >
> > I don't see a local account in phab for you, so you'd end up clicking
> > on the "register or login with persona" button on the login page.
> > FedOAuth has persona intergration, so by
On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 16:23 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2014-08-06 11:43 (GMT-0500) Kevin Martin composed:
>
> > Hmm, I have biosdevname installed (and always have) and have never put
> > net.ifnames=0
> > anywhere that I'm aware of.
>
> I've included net.ifnames=0 on installer cmdline for e
On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 10:32 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 02:38:30PM +0200, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > In Fedora 21 we've more or less dropped biosdevname in favour of
> > systemd. systemd's system is a cleaner implementation and the weight of
> > opinion favours the sy
On Sun, 2014-08-03 at 12:48 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 11:08:27PM -0700, Scott Corcoran wrote:
> > Please sign me on for 5-20 hours a week of QA-related work...
> > not sure just where I fit in yet; feedback is of course welcome.
>
> Hi Scott, and welcome! I'll let
On Thu, 2014-08-28 at 13:52 +0200, François Cami wrote:
> All fine, except that we should maybe feel more than a little
> concerned about release criteria wordered with *must* and not
> *should*, when the dependency is a (rather large) piece of proprietary
> software we have no control of and poss
16 matches
Mail list logo
