The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
87 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5897/nrpe-2.15-2.fc20
67
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-6551/chicken-4.8.0.6-2.fc20
65
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-6615/dru
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
275
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19
87 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5896/nrpe-2.15-2.fc19
67
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-20
This message has been happening on the screens of my more than a dozen F21
and Rawhide installations during most (all?) yum upgrades since long before
the branching, but doesn't show up in /var/log/yum.log. Does it happen to
anyone else? Is it normal for pre-release installations? The result fro
On Seg, 2014-07-28 at 00:06 +0200, Jon Ingason wrote:
> 2014-07-27 23:36, Sérgio Basto skrev:
> > On Dom, 2014-07-27 at 23:31 +0200, Jon Ingason wrote:
> >> 2014-07-27 21:50, Kevin Fenzi skrev:
> >>> On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 18:24:16 +0200
> >>> Jon Ingason wrote:
> >>>
> I follow the Rawhide wi
On Monday 28 July 2014 00:06:52 Jon Ingason wrote:
> Did that but did not help.
>
> Found that fedora-release-22-0-4.noarch was installed an remove it. Then
> I could run yum update, but there was lot of f22 package still
> installed. Need find way to remove them later.
How about
yum distro-sync
2014-07-27 23:36, Sérgio Basto skrev:
> On Dom, 2014-07-27 at 23:31 +0200, Jon Ingason wrote:
>> 2014-07-27 21:50, Kevin Fenzi skrev:
>>> On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 18:24:16 +0200
>>> Jon Ingason wrote:
>>>
I follow the Rawhide wiki how to branch Rawhide to Fedora 21.
What I did was that I ins
On Dom, 2014-07-27 at 23:31 +0200, Jon Ingason wrote:
> 2014-07-27 21:50, Kevin Fenzi skrev:
> > On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 18:24:16 +0200
> > Jon Ingason wrote:
> >
> >> I follow the Rawhide wiki how to branch Rawhide to Fedora 21.
> >> What I did was that I installed
> >> Fedora-Live-Workstation-x86_
2014-07-27 21:24, Sérgio Basto skrev:
> On Dom, 2014-07-27 at 18:24 +0200, Jon Ingason wrote:
>> I follow the Rawhide wiki how to branch Rawhide to Fedora 21.
>> What I did was that I installed
>> Fedora-Live-Workstation-x86_64-rawhide-20140723.iso to VM with libvirt.
>> Then I clone it and used i
2014-07-27 21:50, Kevin Fenzi skrev:
> On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 18:24:16 +0200
> Jon Ingason wrote:
>
>> I follow the Rawhide wiki how to branch Rawhide to Fedora 21.
>> What I did was that I installed
>> Fedora-Live-Workstation-x86_64-rawhide-20140723.iso to VM with
>> libvirt. Then I clone it and us
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2014-07-28
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
We haven't met for a while, and there's been a big F21 slip, so let's
get together and see where we a
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 18:24:16 +0200
Jon Ingason wrote:
> I follow the Rawhide wiki how to branch Rawhide to Fedora 21.
> What I did was that I installed
> Fedora-Live-Workstation-x86_64-rawhide-20140723.iso to VM with
> libvirt. Then I clone it and used it to do the brancing.
...snip...
> What d
On Dom, 2014-07-27 at 18:24 +0200, Jon Ingason wrote:
> I follow the Rawhide wiki how to branch Rawhide to Fedora 21.
> What I did was that I installed
> Fedora-Live-Workstation-x86_64-rawhide-20140723.iso to VM with libvirt.
> Then I clone it and used it to do the brancing.
>
> I did following:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 05:14:33PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > This bug is fixed in gcc-4.9.1-2.fc{21,22} already, and given that it has
> > been reported only after a few years since the bug has been introduced, it
> > is not very likely to trigger on other code.
>
> So, we should do a new mas
I follow the Rawhide wiki how to branch Rawhide to Fedora 21.
What I did was that I installed
Fedora-Live-Workstation-x86_64-rawhide-20140723.iso to VM with libvirt.
Then I clone it and used it to do the brancing.
I did following:
$ su -c 'yum-config-manager --disable rawhide'
$ su -c 'yum-config
On Dom, 2014-07-27 at 09:11 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 11:32:49PM -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> > Phoeonix.com is reporting that Linus has found a code generation
> > error in 4.9 and has switched back to 4.8.
>
> The bug existed from 4.5.0 up, so switching back
So I go away for a day and come back to test with the latest and all
typing into sreen program is coming up garbage characters.
I have tried stopping are restarting screen. I have unplugged are
replugged the usb. No difference. Still garbage characters.
any recommendations?
--
test maili
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
>
> On 07/27/2014 12:11 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 11:32:49PM -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
>>>
>>> Phoeonix.com is reporting that Linus has found a code generation
>>> error in 4.9 and has switched ba
Compose started at Sun Jul 27 07:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[APLpy]
APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs
[PyKDE]
PyKDE-3.16.6-14.fc20.armv7hl requires sip-api(10) >= 0:10.0
[audtty]
audtty-0.1.12-9.fc
On 07/27/2014 12:11 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 11:32:49PM -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
Phoeonix.com is reporting that Linus has found a code generation
error in 4.9 and has switched back to 4.8.
The bug existed from 4.5.0 up, so switching back to 4.8 is a weird
sol
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 11:32:49PM -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> Phoeonix.com is reporting that Linus has found a code generation
> error in 4.9 and has switched back to 4.8.
The bug existed from 4.5.0 up, so switching back to 4.8 is a weird
solution.
> Since Fedora has been including 4.9
20 matches
Mail list logo
