As I understand it, the data corruption only happens if the
Windows partition is downsized. If that is the case, just
grey out the option to downsize a Windows partition.
--
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com www.omen.com
Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications
O
...delays Rawhide init, at least a half minute while its start job runs,
leaving total boot time just short of 2 minutes on P4 HT 2.8GHz. There are no
auto-mounts for NFS in fstab. /etc/exports is the same as it's been here for
well over 5 years.
proc-fs-nfsd.mount static
var-lib-n
On Jul 24, 2014, at 5:27 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-07-24 at 13:46 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> On Jul 24, 2014, at 1:56 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
>>
Nasty paste job, but here it is:
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/4458
>>>
>>> Use "code bloc
On Jul 24, 2014, at 4:14 PM, Mike Ruckman wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 02:09:33PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Final_Release_Criteria#Data_corruption
>>
>> I suggest moving this criterion from final to beta due to bugs like this one:
>> https://bugz
On Thu, 2014-07-24 at 14:00 +0530, Amita Sharma wrote:
> On 07/24/2014 01:56 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hi, folks. Just a note for those following 21 (Branched) or 22
> > (Rawhide): I noticed today that several of my /etc/yum.repos.d/*.repo
> > files had .rpmnew versions, including my fedora.re
On Thu, 2014-07-24 at 13:46 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Jul 24, 2014, at 1:56 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> >> Nasty paste job, but here it is:
> >>
> >> https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/4458
> >
> > Use "code block" syntax, there's even a button for it.
>
> Yeah I didn't
On Wed, 2014-07-23 at 22:56 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> Since my "ultimate goal" is to get a (relatively) clean F21 on my
> server, I started
> experimenting using the Heisenbug netinst.iso with a specified repository of
> http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/development/21/x86_64/os
>
> I
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 02:09:33PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Final_Release_Criteria#Data_corruption
>
> I suggest moving this criterion from final to beta due to bugs like this one:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120964
>
> Beta is rather
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 01:54:01AM +0530, Tejas Bhole wrote:
> Hi, I'm Tejas, I'm 18 years old and a CS Student.I would love to help.I
> have very less experience in Open Source Contributions so i would need some
> help, however, I am willing to be a part ofnot only Fedora, but many Open
> Sou
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 01:54:01AM +0530, Tejas Bhole wrote:
> Hi, I'm Tejas, I'm 18 years old and a CS Student.I would love to help.I
> have very less experience in Open Source Contributions so i would need
> some help, however, I am willing to be a part ofnot only Fedora, but many
> Open Source
Hi, I'm Tejas, I'm 18 years old and a CS Student.I would love to help.I have
very less experience in Open Source Contributions so i would need some help,
however, I am willing to be a part ofnot only Fedora, but many Open Source
Projects. I am currently working up C and Assembly.I usually
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Final_Release_Criteria#Data_corruption
I suggest moving this criterion from final to beta due to bugs like this one:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120964
Beta is rather publicly marketed, and people are actively encouraged to
participate. M
On Jul 24, 2014, at 1:56 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
>> Nasty paste job, but here it is:
>>
>> https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/4458
>
> Use "code block" syntax, there's even a button for it.
Yeah I didn't realize it was going to appear that bad; I did a paste and post
withou
As of last night I could install F21 on a test machine only if I
specified Gnome. So I got a chance to try Gnome "Classic".
The good news: GC works, even over TigerVNC.
The bad news: GC is better than nothing, but not by much.
GC appears to be a highly lobotomized hack of Gnome 2,
missing most o
On Wed, 2014-07-23 at 15:30 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:11:23PM +0300, cornel panceac wrote:
> > > > thank you all very much. is there a way to prevent this from happening?
> > > well, read my always-accurate, always-hilarious and always-informative
> > > posts on test
==
#fedora-blocker-review: F21-blocker-review
==
Meeting started by roshi at 15:59:25 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2014-07-23/f21-blocker-review.2014-07-2
Compose started at Thu Jul 24 07:15:03 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[APLpy]
APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs
[PyKDE]
PyKDE-3.16.6-14.fc20.armv7hl requires sip-api(10) >= 0:10.0
[audtty]
audtty-0.1.12-9.fc
Greetings,!
as you probably noticed, Fedora 21 is still not frozen (Alpha Change
Deadline was planned for this Tuesday, 2014-07-22), due to several
issues we hit while working on the Alpha release (incomplete test
composes etc).
There's also Flock being held in the beginning of August (2014-08-06
On 07/24/2014 01:56 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hi, folks. Just a note for those following 21 (Branched) or 22
(Rawhide): I noticed today that several of my /etc/yum.repos.d/*.repo
files had .rpmnew versions, including my fedora.repo and
fedora-updates-testing.repo and fedora-rawhide.repo ,
Hi Ad
> Nasty paste job, but here it is:
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/4458
Use "code block" syntax, there's even a button for it.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
20 matches
Mail list logo
