Re: Proposed generic release criterion: service manipulation

2014-07-18 Thread Jared K. Smith
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Shutting down, logging out and rebooting must work using standard > console commands and the mechanisms offered (if any) by all > release-blocking desktops. > I think this is reasonable and well put. -- Jared Smith -- test mailing list

Re: Who turned out the light - GNOME Classic - DesktopNames

2014-07-18 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 22:10 +0200, poma wrote: > On 18.07.2014 17:44, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 09:09 +0200, poma wrote: > > > >> More than the obvious link that you missed at the very beginning of > >> the thread, what really worries me is that this particular commit was > >

Re: Proposed generic release criterion: service manipulation

2014-07-18 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 15:01 -0400, David A. De Graaf wrote: > On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 12:22:40PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > System service manipulation > > > > It must be possible to start, stop, enable and disable system services > > using the initialization framework's standard comma

Re: bug attached images not browser loadable (was: bug to which attached)

2014-07-18 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 13:19 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > On 2014-07-18 09:50 (GMT-0700) Adam Williamson composed: > > > On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 12:04 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > > >> Now if you can, provide a workaround for the inane bugzilla.redhat.com > >> policy, found on no other Bugzilla instal

Re: bug attached images not browser loadable

2014-07-18 Thread poma
On 18.07.2014 20:39, Felix Miata wrote: On 2014-07-18 13:57 (GMT-0400) Rahul Sundaram composed: Felix Miata wrote: Felix, for some reason every reply of yours ends up breaking the thread. Can you please fix that? I see no evidence of thread breakage here. My copy from the listserv of the m

Re: Who turned out the light - GNOME Classic - DesktopNames

2014-07-18 Thread poma
On 18.07.2014 17:44, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 09:09 +0200, poma wrote: More than the obvious link that you missed at the very beginning of the thread, what really worries me is that this particular commit was applied more than two months, and no one noticed or not published

Re: bug attached images not browser loadable

2014-07-18 Thread Eric Blake
On 07/18/2014 12:54 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > HI > > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Felix Miata wrote: > >> Even if I could see evidence of breakage I wouldn't know what to do about >> it. I'm simply using SeaMonkey's reply-to-list button, which strips the >> inanely long "For testing and

Re: Proposed generic release criterion: service manipulation

2014-07-18 Thread David A. De Graaf
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 12:22:40PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > System service manipulation > > It must be possible to start, stop, enable and disable system services > using the initialization framework's standard commands. Oh yes, that's perfect. Had this been applied to the most basic L

Re: bug attached images not browser loadable

2014-07-18 Thread Rahul Sundaram
HI On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Felix Miata wrote: > Even if I could see evidence of breakage I wouldn't know what to do about > it. I'm simply using SeaMonkey's reply-to-list button, which strips the > inanely long "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases" from > the "To:" fie

Re: bug attached images not browser loadable

2014-07-18 Thread Felix Miata
On 2014-07-18 13:57 (GMT-0400) Rahul Sundaram composed: Felix Miata wrote: Felix, for some reason every reply of yours ends up breaking the thread. Can you please fix that? I see no evidence of thread breakage here. My copy from the listserv of the message you replied to appears to have 11

Re: bug attached images not browser loadable (was: bug to which attached)

2014-07-18 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Felix Miata Felix, for some reason every reply of yours ends up breaking the thread. Can you please fix that? Rahul -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: bug attached images not browser loadable (was: bug to which attached)

2014-07-18 Thread Felix Miata
On 2014-07-18 09:50 (GMT-0700) Adam Williamson composed: On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 12:04 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: Now if you can, provide a workaround for the inane bugzilla.redhat.com policy, found on no other Bugzilla installation I've ever encountered, that requires a bazillion hoops be negot

Re: bug to which attached

2014-07-18 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 12:04 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > On 2014-07-18 08:45 (GMT-0700) Adam Williamson composed: > > > On Thu, 2014-07-17 at 20:53 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > > >> On 2014-07-17 20:41 (GMT-0400) Adam Williamson composed: > > >>> Bugzilla does not provide a backtrack from > >>> an

Re: bug to which attached

2014-07-18 Thread Eric Blake
On 07/18/2014 09:45 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2014-07-17 at 20:53 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: >> On 2014-07-17 20:41 (GMT-0400) Adam Williamson composed: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=918676 >> >>> What bug is this attached to? Bugzilla does not provide a backtrack

Re: bug to which attached

2014-07-18 Thread Felix Miata
On 2014-07-18 08:45 (GMT-0700) Adam Williamson composed: On Thu, 2014-07-17 at 20:53 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: On 2014-07-17 20:41 (GMT-0400) Adam Williamson composed: Bugzilla does not provide a backtrack from an attachment to a bug report, infuriatingly. A convenient link to click, yo

Re: Who turned out the light - GNOME Classic - DesktopNames

2014-07-18 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 09:09 +0200, poma wrote: > More than the obvious link that you missed at the very beginning of > the thread, what really worries me is that this particular commit was > applied more than two months, and no one noticed or not published so > far it causes an obvious fault. > Be

Re: bug to which attached (was: Who turned out...)

2014-07-18 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2014-07-17 at 20:53 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > On 2014-07-17 20:41 (GMT-0400) Adam Williamson composed: > > >>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=918676 > > > What bug is this attached to? Bugzilla does not provide a backtrack from > > an attachment to a bug report, infuriating

Re: Cloud & Server F21a-TC1

2014-07-18 Thread poma
http://goo.gl/QIe2NC 'Cloud-F21a-TC1-x86_64-DVD-[12]b.png' & 'Server...' also, "WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 495 at mm/slab_common.c:69 kmem_cache_create+0x1a9/0x330()" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121092 poma -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https

Re: Cloud & Server F21a-TC1

2014-07-18 Thread poma
On 18.07.2014 10:42, poma wrote: On 18.07.2014 01:37, poma wrote: http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/F21a-TC1/Cloud[Server]/x86_64/iso/Cloud[Server]-F21a-TC1-x86_64-netinst.iso Starting installer, one moment... anaconda 21.47 for Cloud[Server] F21a-TC1 (pre-release) started. Could not p

Re: Cloud & Server F21a-TC1

2014-07-18 Thread poma
On 18.07.2014 01:37, poma wrote: http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/F21a-TC1/Cloud[Server]/x86_64/iso/Cloud[Server]-F21a-TC1-x86_64-netinst.iso Starting installer, one moment... anaconda 21.47 for Cloud[Server] F21a-TC1 (pre-release) started. Could not parse metalink https://mirrors.fed

Re: Who turned out the light - GNOME Classic - DesktopNames

2014-07-18 Thread poma
On 18.07.2014 02:41, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2014-07-17 at 13:19 +0200, poma wrote: On 17.07.2014 00:04, poma wrote: On 16.07.2014 21:07, poma wrote: On 16.07.2014 18:47, poma wrote: On 16.07.2014 18:24, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: On 07/16/2014 09:10 AM, poma wrote: https://bugzi