Re: bug to which attached (was: Who turned out...)

2014-07-17 Thread Felix Miata
On 2014-07-17 20:41 (GMT-0400) Adam Williamson composed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=918676 What bug is this attached to? Bugzilla does not provide a backtrack from an attachment to a bug report, infuriatingly. A convenient link to click, you're right, it has none. But the

Re: Who turned out the light - GNOME Classic - DesktopNames

2014-07-17 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2014-07-17 at 13:19 +0200, poma wrote: > On 17.07.2014 00:04, poma wrote: > > On 16.07.2014 21:07, poma wrote: > >> On 16.07.2014 18:47, poma wrote: > >>> On 16.07.2014 18:24, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: > > On 07/16/2014 09:10 AM, poma wrote: > > > > https://bugzilla.red

Cloud & Server F21a-TC1 - Could not parse metalink - No repomd file

2014-07-17 Thread poma
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/F21a-TC1/Cloud[Server]/x86_64/iso/Cloud[Server]-F21a-TC1-x86_64-netinst.iso Starting installer, one moment... anaconda 21.47 for Cloud[Server] F21a-TC1 (pre-release) started. Could not parse metalink https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=fedor

Re: Fedora 21 download able qQqloud images

2014-07-17 Thread poma
On 17.07.2014 20:45, poma wrote: So far I have found this image http://ryanlerch.org/fedoranext/fedora-next-ryan.svg Even though the image is cool, can't boot. :) Has anyone found the boot able one, or we need DIY method, again? There is an installation image http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/a

Fedora 21 download able qQqloud images

2014-07-17 Thread poma
So far I have found this image http://ryanlerch.org/fedoranext/fedora-next-ryan.svg Even though the image is cool, can't boot. :) Has anyone found the boot able one, or we need DIY method, again? poma -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.

Testcase Review

2014-07-17 Thread Mike Ruckman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greetings Testers! I've been working on some testcases and general wiki work for the Cloud SIG [0]. While I was doing this I created a few testcases and edited a couple of our others. I'd like to these get reviewed and placed on the matrices. Below

Re: test days

2014-07-17 Thread Amita Sharma
On 07/17/2014 08:44 PM, Mike Ruckman wrote: On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 19:06:35 +0530 Amita Sharma wrote: On 07/17/2014 06:56 PM, Amita Sharma wrote: Hi, Question:: where all the test days listed for Fedora21. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Fedora_21_test_days is blank. http://testdays.qa.fedor

Re: test days

2014-07-17 Thread Mike Ruckman
On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 19:06:35 +0530 Amita Sharma wrote: > On 07/17/2014 06:56 PM, Amita Sharma wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Question:: where all the test days listed for Fedora21. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Fedora_21_test_days is blank. > > > > http://testdays.qa.fedoraproject.org/testdays/al

Re: test days

2014-07-17 Thread Amita Sharma
On 07/17/2014 06:56 PM, Amita Sharma wrote: Hi, Question:: where all the test days listed for Fedora21. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Fedora_21_test_days is blank. http://testdays.qa.fedoraproject.org/testdays/all_events does not even list any of them? I think I found it https://apps.fedo

test days

2014-07-17 Thread Amita Sharma
Hi, Question:: where all the test days listed for Fedora21. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Fedora_21_test_days is blank. http://testdays.qa.fedoraproject.org/testdays/all_events does not even list any of them? Thanks, Ami -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: ht

Re: Is anyone else seeing a problem with glibc 2.19.90-29.fc22 ?

2014-07-17 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 12:59:45 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: $ fedpkg switch-branch f21 Could not execute switch_branch: len([]) != len(['PRIV_END: seteuid: Function not implemented', '', '', 'and the repository exists.']) ERROR:rpkg:Could not execute switch_branch: len([]) != len(['PRIV_END

Re: Who turned out the light - GNOME Classic - DesktopNames

2014-07-17 Thread poma
On 17.07.2014 00:04, poma wrote: On 16.07.2014 21:07, poma wrote: On 16.07.2014 18:47, poma wrote: On 16.07.2014 18:24, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: On 07/16/2014 09:10 AM, poma wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120283 Has anyone run into something like this, so far? pom