(Rawhide users) Fedora 22 branching: What You Need To Know

2014-07-09 Thread Adam Williamson
Hey folks! As we just hit a branch point, here's a refresher on what this means for folks who've been running Rawhide. If you want to keep running Rawhide, which will now contain packages tracked for Fedora *22*, you don't need to do anything: just keep updating. From tomorrow onwards, you'll star

Heads-up: Alpha TC1 compose request filed

2014-07-09 Thread Adam Williamson
Heads-up, folks: the Alpha TC1 compose request has been filed - https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5940 I expect by tomorrow we'll have either an Alpha TC1 compose or a large fire. Let's wait and see which! :) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora |

F-21 Branched report: 20140709 changes

2014-07-09 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Wed Jul 9 20:16:43 UTC 2014 Broken deps for armhfp -- [APLpy] APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs [PyKDE] PyKDE-3.16.6-14.fc20.armv7hl requires sip-api(10) >= 0:10.0 [audtty] audtty-0.1.12-9.fc

Fedora 19 updates-testing report

2014-07-09 Thread updates
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing: Age URL 256 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19 69 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5896/nrpe-2.15-2.fc19 58 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-20

Fedora 20 updates-testing report

2014-07-09 Thread updates
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing: Age URL 69 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5897/nrpe-2.15-2.fc20 49 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-6551/chicken-4.8.0.6-2.fc20 47 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-6615/dru

Re: Fedora 21 Alpha validation test work

2014-07-09 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 07:52 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote: > > Hi, folks. > > > > So, we're scheduled for Alpha TC1 tomorrow. We had a nice happy > > co-operative plan where QA and the WGs would collaborate on revising the > > release validation test process for Fedora.next... > > > > ...which, well,

Re: Draft combined Alpha release criteria for F21

2014-07-09 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 04:48 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote: > > Hi, folks. So I've just slapped together the existing release criteria > > drafts into a draft combined Fedora 21 Alpha release criteria page: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_F21_Alpha_criteria > > Thanks Adam, i

Re: 2014-07-09 @ **17:00 UTC** - F21 Blocker Review #1

2014-07-09 Thread Mike Ruckman
On Wed, 9 Jul 2014 23:07:12 +0400 Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Hi, > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:20 AM, Mike Ruckman > wrote: > > # F21 Blocker Review meeting #1 > > # Date: 2014-07-09 > > # Time: 17:00 UTC (13:00 EST, 10:00 PST) > > # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.neteria > > ... > >

Re: 2014-07-09 @ **17:00 UTC** - F21 Blocker Review #1

2014-07-09 Thread Igor Gnatenko
On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 14:09 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 23:07:12 +0400, > Igor Gnatenko wrote: > >Hi, > >On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:20 AM, Mike Ruckman wrote: > >> # F21 Blocker Review meeting #1 > >> # Date: 2014-07-09 > >> # Time: 17:00 UTC (13:00 EST, 10:00 PST) > >

Re: 2014-07-09 @ **17:00 UTC** - F21 Blocker Review #1

2014-07-09 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 23:07:12 +0400, Igor Gnatenko wrote: Hi, On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:20 AM, Mike Ruckman wrote: # F21 Blocker Review meeting #1 # Date: 2014-07-09 # Time: 17:00 UTC (13:00 EST, 10:00 PST) # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.neteria ... == // Mike Fedora QA

Re: 2014-07-09 @ **17:00 UTC** - F21 Blocker Review #1

2014-07-09 Thread Igor Gnatenko
Hi, On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:20 AM, Mike Ruckman wrote: > # F21 Blocker Review meeting #1 > # Date: 2014-07-09 > # Time: 17:00 UTC (13:00 EST, 10:00 PST) > # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.neteria > ... > == > // Mike > Fedora QA > irc: roshi | twitter: roshi_fedora > blog: roshi

2014-07-09 @ **17:00 UTC** - F21 Blocker Review #1 Minutes

2014-07-09 Thread Mike Ruckman
Below are the meeting minutes from today's Blocker Review meeting. We went through 14 bugs. Not bad for a first meeting. The next meeting will be at 16:00 UTC 2014-07-16. == #fedora-blocker-review: F21-blocker-review

Re: Fedora 21 Alpha validation test work

2014-07-09 Thread Kamil Paral
> Hi, folks. > > So, we're scheduled for Alpha TC1 tomorrow. We had a nice happy > co-operative plan where QA and the WGs would collaborate on revising the > release validation test process for Fedora.next... > > ...which, well, didn't really happen. As of this morning we were nowhere > near havi

Re: 2014-07-09 @ **17:00 UTC** - F21 Blocker Review #1

2014-07-09 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
- Original Message - > On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 06:20:43PM -0600, Mike Ruckman wrote: > > # F21 Blocker Review meeting #1 > > # Date: 2014-07-09 > > # Time: 17:00 UTC (13:00 EST, 10:00 PST) > > # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net > > Hmmm. This is right at the same time a

Re: Draft combined Alpha release criteria for F21

2014-07-09 Thread Kamil Paral
> Hi, folks. So I've just slapped together the existing release criteria > drafts into a draft combined Fedora 21 Alpha release criteria page: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_F21_Alpha_criteria Thanks Adam, it looks OK with a quick look. The cockpit port will need clarific