For several weeks, maybe several months, most of my Rawhide installations
generate an error trying to mount noauto nfs items in fstab:
Job for rpc-statd.service failed. See 'systemctl status rpc-statd.service'
and 'journalctl -xn' for details.
Output from those:
[start]rpc-statd.service - NFS
On May 27, 2014, at 9:30 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> On 05/27/2014 12:56 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> On May 23, 2014, at 12:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> I don't really find them 'astronomically' slow any more, now that
>>> slub_debug is left off most of the time. Slightly slower than regul
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 20:15 -0400, Jonathan Calloway wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> I am working through update testing on F20. I would like to know if
> there is a way to respond specific test cases. Specifically, I would
> like to be able to add screen shots and steps for reproduction. As it
> is, I
Greetings!
I am working through update testing on F20. I would like to know if
there is a way to respond specific test cases. Specifically, I would
like to be able to add screen shots and steps for reproduction. As it
is, I feel like I have to fail an entire update in Karma over one minor
issue
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
214
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19
27 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5896/nrpe-2.15-2.fc19
22
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-20
Rawhide does not do the switch to small characters on startup
and the resultant desktop maxes out at 1024, about a fourth
of the correct 2560x1600.
Is there a way for force the correct 2560 resolution?
Meanwhile the 680ti works fine with the Nvidia driver
on Heisenbug as well as Win7.
--
C
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 09:59 -0400, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> On 05/28/2014 12:06 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> > Has anyone gotten a successful kickstart install with current rawhide?
> >
> > With the smae ks file (except using eth0 for the network device), a
> > Fedora 20 kickstart install complete
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed 28 May 2014 11:04:39 AM EDT, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:59:31AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I'm of the opinion that we should keep the blocker process
unified until and unless that becomes impossible. The o
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:59:31AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >> I'm of the opinion that we should keep the blocker process
> >> unified until and unless that becomes impossible. The only
> >> benefit I can think of to separating them would be metrics, and I
> >> cannot measure the degree to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/28/2014 10:11 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 08:11:16AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> I'm of the opinion that we should keep the blocker process
>> unified until and unless that becomes impossible. The only
>> benefit I
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 08:11:16AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> I'm of the opinion that we should keep the blocker process unified
> until and unless that becomes impossible. The only benefit I can think
> of to separating them would be metrics, and I cannot measure the
> degree to which I don
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 09:59:26AM -0400, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1102049
> "Fixed in rawhide" ... anyone know when a updated anaconda will be pushed?
Ooh. Thanks. :)
I don't know the answer to the second part, though.
--
Matthew Miller-- Fedor
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:06:20AM -0400, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> Has anyone gotten a successful kickstart install with current rawhide?
> With the smae ks file (except using eth0 for the network device), a
> Fedora 20 kickstart install completed nicely.
> Doing the "same" (ens3 instead of eth0) k
On 05/28/2014 12:06 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
Has anyone gotten a successful kickstart install with current rawhide?
With the smae ks file (except using eth0 for the network device), a
Fedora 20 kickstart install completed nicely.
Doing the "same" (ens3 instead of eth0) kickstart with rawhid
On Wed, 28 May 2014 14:59:01 +0200, Kreshnik Abazi wrote:
> Das ist eine Test.. testt tes ..testt
Sending such test messages to mailing-lists is considered impolite.
Imagine hundreds or thousands of subscribers would do that. This list
is for discussing Fedora Test Releases.
If you wante
Das ist eine Test.. testt tes ..testt
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 08:11:16 -0400,
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
I'm of the opinion that we should keep the blocker process unified
until and unless that becomes impossible. The only benefit I can think
of to separating them would be metrics, and I cannot mea
Hi all.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/27/2014 09:22 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi, folks. So continuing with the theme of setting up the
> Fedora.next QA process, I thought before going too far with draft
> release criteria etc, we could discuss a couple of important points
> that
20 matches
Mail list logo
