Has anyone gotten a successful kickstart install with current rawhide?
With the smae ks file (except using eth0 for the network device), a
Fedora 20 kickstart install completed nicely.
Doing the "same" (ens3 instead of eth0) kickstart with rawhide 5/27/2014
DVD iso, it completely ignored the
On Tue, 27 May 2014 18:22:21 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi, folks. So continuing with the theme of setting up the Fedora.next
> QA process, I thought before going too far with draft release
> criteria etc, we could discuss a couple of important points that have
> come up since I sent out the
On 05/27/2014 12:56 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On May 23, 2014, at 12:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
I don't really find them 'astronomically' slow any more, now that
slub_debug is left off most of the time. Slightly slower than regular
kernels, sure, but perfectly fine for testing. Is it different
Hi, folks. So continuing with the theme of setting up the Fedora.next QA
process, I thought before going too far with draft release criteria etc,
we could discuss a couple of important points that have come up since I
sent out the draft test plan.
There are two kind of similar issues in particular
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:58:12PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> As with all the others who've weighed in so far, I agree that the
> optimal path is just for us all to talk to each other. I generally
> prefer workflows that assume everyone's happy to work positively
> together to a consensus solu
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 07:58 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 06:02:07PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hi, folks! So, I quickly bashed out that draft F21 Test Plan I've been
> > threatening to write for the last month or so.
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/
On Tue, 27 May 2014 07:58:55 -0400
Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> Yeah. If something isn't working, do you think the best path is QA->WG
> directly, or should it be QA says something to FESCo, FESCo works
> with WG?
>
> Since parts of this are new to all of us, and other parts new to a
> lot of us,
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 06:02:07PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> for Fedora 21 testing *overall* - i.e. it's the QA team's responsibility
>> to make sure the WGs do the stuff assigned to them in the plan. If that
>> makes sense. Discussio
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 06:02:07PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi, folks! So, I quickly bashed out that draft F21 Test Plan I've been
> threatening to write for the last month or so.
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_Fedora_21_test_plan
> So, what's the idea here?
Psshh -- s
On 05/27/2014 05:27 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2014-05-25 at 18:49 +0530, Amita Sharma wrote:
Thanks for explaining the things so nicely, I hope I got it right and
updated the stuff accordingly.
Please check ::
1. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Test_Cases - New Category 3
2. htt
Monday's rawhide has reverted to a sluggish desktop
and a number of kernel OOPs on my office machine.
I upgraded my office machine to a PNY Geforce GTX780TI.
The card has been out since November. Fry's is selling it at a discount.
Windows 7 found updated drivers automatically.
The Nvidia driver
11 matches
Mail list logo
