On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 09:11:10PM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
>
> > Sorry to post this here, but it's the only Fedora mailing list that I'm on
> > at this point. Does anyone know what happened to fedora forums. They've
> > been
Hi
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> Sorry to post this here, but it's the only Fedora mailing list that I'm on
> at this point. Does anyone know what happened to fedora forums. They've
> been down for a few days now.
> Thanks, and again, apologies for the OT posting.
>
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
211
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19
24 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5896/nrpe-2.15-2.fc19
19
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-20
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
32
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5497/openstack-keystone-2013.2.3-3.fc20
24 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5897/nrpe-2.15-2.fc20
13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2
On 05/23/2014 10:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 14:31 +0530, Amita Sharma wrote:
On 05/23/2014 02:58 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 20:22 +0530, Amita Sharma wrote:
Thanks for working on this. I'm curious as to the context: is this
really a Fedora-level
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/25/2014 06:57 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> Sorry to post this here, but it's the only Fedora mailing list that
> I'm on at this point. Does anyone know what happened to fedora
> forums. They've been down for a few days now. Thanks, and again,
>
Sorry to post this here, but it's the only Fedora mailing list that I'm on
at this point. Does anyone know what happened to fedora forums. They've
been down for a few days now.
Thanks, and again, apologies for the OT posting.
--
Scott Robbins
PGP keyID EB3467D6
( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA
Broken deps for i386
--
[MegaMek]
MegaMek-0.30.11-13.fc20.i686 requires libgcj_bc.so.1
MegaMek-0.30.11-13.fc20.i686 requires java-gcj-compat
MegaMek-0.30.11-13.fc20.i686 requires java-gcj-compat
[PyKDE]
PyKDE-3
On Sun, 25 May 2014, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> (while this is probably not technically a fedora rawhide issue,
> since i'm trying this on rawhide, i figure this would be the best
> place to ask about it.)
>
> i really should know how to do this, but i'm confused about what
> happens when i t
(while this is probably not technically a fedora rawhide issue,
since i'm trying this on rawhide, i figure this would be the best
place to ask about it.)
i really should know how to do this, but i'm confused about what
happens when i try to configure which "kernel" messages i generate
actuall
10 matches
Mail list logo