On 05/22/2014 09:22 PM, Mike Ruckman wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2014 20:22:47 +0530
Amita Sharma wrote:
On 05/17/2014 12:39 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 12:06 +0530, Amita Sharma wrote:
Hi,
I have created
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:2014-05-16_Allow_turningoff_vattr_loo
On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 20:22 +0530, Amita Sharma wrote:
> > Thanks for working on this. I'm curious as to the context: is this
> > really a Fedora-level effort, or is it more 389-ds upstream-level? What
> > are the other test plans you are planning to work on? Thanks!
> Hi Adam,
>
> I have updated
I just upgraded the version of Phabricator that we have on qadevel [1]
and we now have the ability to do FAS authentication instead of the old
standalone username/password setup.
[1] https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/
If you have no idea what I'm talking about, you can probably ignore
On Thu, 22 May 2014 10:14:49 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> Once again %check is the wrong tool for the job...
It cannot retest automatically when the target environment changes,
but it is valid way to perform essential tests when the package
is built for the first time. That has been helpful befor
On Thu, 22 May 2014 20:22:47 +0530
Amita Sharma wrote:
> On 05/17/2014 12:39 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 12:06 +0530, Amita Sharma wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have created
> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:2014-05-16_Allow_turningoff_vattr_lookup_Test_Plan
> >> for o
On 05/21/2014 12:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 06:27 -0700, Thomas Gilliard wrote:
Problem is at the moment only f21 (rawhide) live SoaS live writes a
booting f21 DE.
Other lives give "unaligned pointer 0x3feefa81" INIT18: BOOT FAILURE
on reboot after installation.[1]
T
On 05/17/2014 12:39 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 12:06 +0530, Amita Sharma wrote:
Hi,
I have created
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:2014-05-16_Allow_turningoff_vattr_lookup_Test_Plan
for one of the new feature in 389.
I want to add it to upstream test plans, but I am not
On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 14:40 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 22 May 2014 10:34:01 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
>
> > uthash-1.9.9-4.fc21
> > ---
> > * Wed May 21 2014 Peter Robinson 1.9.9-4
> > - Root package should be noarch too
>
> Please revert that change.
>
On Thu, 22 May 2014 14:40:23 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 22 May 2014 10:34:01 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
>
> > uthash-1.9.9-4.fc21
> > ---
> > * Wed May 21 2014 Peter Robinson 1.9.9-4
> > - Root package should be noarch too
>
> Please revert that change.
On Thu, 22 May 2014 10:34:01 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
> uthash-1.9.9-4.fc21
> ---
> * Wed May 21 2014 Peter Robinson 1.9.9-4
> - Root package should be noarch too
Please revert that change.
The root package is not noarch, so %check is run for all build archs.
AFAIR,
10 matches
Mail list logo