The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
176
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19
112
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-24023/varnish-3.0.5-1.fc19
59
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FED
Today's rawhide seems to be working fine on my office machine.
Currently I am running Gnome to play with the terminal smart
resize feature.
Is there a short tome to convince Gnome2 or Xfce users to
switch to the current Gnome?
--
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com www.omen.com
Develope
On 19.04.2014 19:02, Tom London wrote:
> BZ'ed here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089488
INFO: possible recursive locking detected
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951862
poma
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedorapr
On Sat, 19 Apr 2014 09:49:57 -0700
Tom London wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel <
> clydekunkel7...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 19 Apr 2014 12:45:10 -0400
> > "Clyde E. Kunkel" wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 19 Apr 2014 09:32:00 -0700
> > > Tom London wrote:
> > > >
> >
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Tom London wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel <
> clydekunkel7...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 19 Apr 2014 12:45:10 -0400
>> "Clyde E. Kunkel" wrote:
>>
>> > On Sat, 19 Apr 2014 09:32:00 -0700
>> > Tom London wrote:
>> > >
>> > May be
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel <
clydekunkel7...@verizon.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Apr 2014 12:45:10 -0400
> "Clyde E. Kunkel" wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 19 Apr 2014 09:32:00 -0700
> > Tom London wrote:
> > >
> > May be a red herring. The file does not exist on my machine booted
> >
On Sat, 19 Apr 2014 12:45:10 -0400
"Clyde E. Kunkel" wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Apr 2014 09:32:00 -0700
> Tom London wrote:
> >
> May be a red herring. The file does not exist on my machine booted
> with kernel-3.14.
Apologies for not deleting majority of msg in my previous reply.
--
test mailing
On Sat, 19 Apr 2014 09:32:00 -0700
Tom London wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Tom London wrote:
>
> > I also had not been able to get a 3-15 kernel to boot-up/display
> > the Gnome desktop (Lenovo X200, Intel graphics).
> >
> > I had tried my usual tricks:
> > 1. boot with enforcing=0
On Sat, 19 Apr 2014 08:22:49 -0700
Tom London wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 3:16 PM, poma
> wrote:
>
> > On 17.04.2014 23:54, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> > > On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 23:13:52 +0200
> > > poma wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 17.04.2014 22:16, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> > >>
> > >> ...
> > >>>
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Tom London wrote:
> I also had not been able to get a 3-15 kernel to boot-up/display the Gnome
> desktop (Lenovo X200, Intel graphics).
>
> I had tried my usual tricks:
> 1. boot with enforcing=0
> 2. switch to a VT, run "telinit 3" and then "telinit 5".
>
> I not
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 3:16 PM, poma wrote:
> On 17.04.2014 23:54, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 23:13:52 +0200
> > poma wrote:
> >
> >> On 17.04.2014 22:16, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> >>
> >> ...
> >>> very obtuse. Please explain what they have to do with the problem.
> >>>
> >
On Fri, 18 Apr 2014 22:44:59 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> A Rawhide yum upgrade shortly after cleaning phase began segfaulted. Now yum
> check shows about 200 duplicates. I don't seen anything in yum help that says
> how to fix it. Is there some special plugin for finishing cleaning? Howto fix?
12 matches
Mail list logo