The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
173
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19
110
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-24023/varnish-3.0.5-1.fc19
56
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FED
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
110
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-24018/varnish-3.0.5-1.fc20
56
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-2751/zabbix-2.0.11-2.fc20
14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-4691/
On 04/16/2014 06:15 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 17:46 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 19:55 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
Installed the creative and development workstation et al. with the FC20
pxeboot.
No lockups so far.
What about sound? Does it
Are yo sure it's caused by newer kernel?
I just updated my system, can't use KDM to login into GNOME,
ctrl-alt-f2 and startx manully solved the problem.
3.14 stable kernel here.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/tes
On 17.04.2014 04:34, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 02:28:11 +0200
> poma wrote:
>
>> On 17.04.2014 02:11, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 17:00 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 17:41 -0600, Pete Travis wrote:
> On Apr 16, 2014 9:12 AM, "
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/16/2014 03:18 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> First big gotcha...
>
> With at least the x86_64 kde live image... if you install, you get
> the kernel-debug as default boot entry.
>
> Not sure if this is all live images, or what is causing it, but it
On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 02:28:11 +0200
poma wrote:
> On 17.04.2014 02:11, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 17:00 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 17:41 -0600, Pete Travis wrote:
> >>> On Apr 16, 2014 9:12 AM, "Clyde E. Kunkel"
> >>> wrote:
>
> With a
On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 17:11:07 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 17:00 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 17:41 -0600, Pete Travis wrote:
> > > On Apr 16, 2014 9:12 AM, "Clyde E. Kunkel"
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > With all of the kernels in the rawhide 3.1
On 17.04.2014 03:14, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-04-17 at 02:28 +0200, poma wrote:
>
>>> Hum, actually - it looks like on my tablet, dropping 'rhgb quiet' from
>>> the cmdline helps (no 'enforcing=0' needed). Does that apply to others?
>>>
>>
>> # systemctl stop plymouth-halt plymouth-ke
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 17:46 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 19:55 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> > Installed the creative and development workstation et al. with the FC20
> > pxeboot.
> > No lockups so far.
> >
>
> What about sound? Does it work with 3-15 kernels?
Yo
On Thu, 2014-04-17 at 02:28 +0200, poma wrote:
> > Hum, actually - it looks like on my tablet, dropping 'rhgb quiet' from
> > the cmdline helps (no 'enforcing=0' needed). Does that apply to others?
> >
>
> # systemctl stop plymouth-halt plymouth-kexec plymouth-poweroff
> plymouth-quit-wait plymo
On 17.04.2014 02:11, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 17:00 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 17:41 -0600, Pete Travis wrote:
>>> On Apr 16, 2014 9:12 AM, "Clyde E. Kunkel"
>>> wrote:
With all of the kernels in the rawhide 3.15 series so far the gnome
>
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 17:41 -0600, Pete Travis wrote:
> On Apr 16, 2014 9:12 AM, "Clyde E. Kunkel"
> wrote:
> >
> > With all of the kernels in the rawhide 3.15 series so far the gnome
> > desktop fails to load. Kernels in the 3.14 series are fine.
> >
> > All I can see is that the X server seems
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 17:00 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 17:41 -0600, Pete Travis wrote:
> > On Apr 16, 2014 9:12 AM, "Clyde E. Kunkel"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > With all of the kernels in the rawhide 3.15 series so far the gnome
> > > desktop fails to load. Kernels in the 3
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 17:45 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 12:56 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > Well, just to interject another data point, I appear to be having
> > similar issues that are intermittent and/or hardware related. Booting
> > Rawhide sometimes seems to resul
On Apr 16, 2014 9:12 AM, "Clyde E. Kunkel"
wrote:
>
> With all of the kernels in the rawhide 3.15 series so far the gnome
> desktop fails to load. Kernels in the 3.14 series are fine.
>
> All I can see is that the X server seems to start (ps -A | grep Xorg
> returns a PID), but the Xorg.0.log is
On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 19:55 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> Installed the creative and development workstation et al. with the FC20
> pxeboot.
> No lockups so far.
>
What about sound? Does it work with 3-15 kernels?
--
Mike Chambers
Madisonville, KY
"Best little town on Earth!"
--
t
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 12:56 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Well, just to interject another data point, I appear to be having
> similar issues that are intermittent and/or hardware related. Booting
> Rawhide sometimes seems to result in a black screen after X should start
> up (but the system is r
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:23:15PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
> Since when do we do something like this? Sounds like an over reaction to me.
> Installing (security) updates is the first thing you should do after
> installing anyway and besides who decided this and when?
> What are the criteria for doing
I've asked websites folks to pull the updated f20 live images from the
site for now.
f19 images seem fine so far (or at least they don't have this issue).
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproj
On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 15:07:40 -0600
Mike Ruckman wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 11:11:46 -0400
> "Clyde E. Kunkel" wrote:
>
> > With all of the kernels in the rawhide 3.15 series so far the gnome
> > desktop fails to load. Kernels in the 3.14 series are fine.
> >
> > All I can see is that the X
.../rawhide/i386/os/images/
boot.iso 16-Apr-2014 15:17 425M
.../rawhide/x86_64/os/images/
boot.iso 16-Apr-2014 15:10 372M
.../7002/6747002/
Fedora-Live-Xfce-i686-rawhide-20140416.iso
.../7005/6747005/
Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20140416.iso
All four images are bootable!
Thanks P.J
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> We have new f19/f20 images with openssl updated, and they appear to be
> default/live already.
>
> Were we waiting for some testing runs on them before announcing?
> (Which we should have done before making them live, imho)
>
> O
First big gotcha...
With at least the x86_64 kde live image... if you install, you get the
kernel-debug as default boot entry.
Not sure if this is all live images, or what is causing it, but it
seems pretty bad. ;(
Thanks to bitlord for spotting this!
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP s
On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 11:11:46 -0400
"Clyde E. Kunkel" wrote:
> With all of the kernels in the rawhide 3.15 series so far the gnome
> desktop fails to load. Kernels in the 3.14 series are fine.
>
> All I can see is that the X server seems to start (ps -A | grep Xorg
> returns a PID), but the Xorg
On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 13:11:18 -0600
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> We have new f19/f20 images with openssl updated, and they appear to be
> default/live already.
>
> Were we waiting for some testing runs on them before announcing?
> (Which we should have done before making them live, imho
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 13:40 -0400, Jared K. Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel <
> clydekunkel7...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> > With all of the kernels in the rawhide 3.15 series so far the gnome
> > desktop fails to load.
> >
>
> I'm wondering if this is hardware-speci
Greetings.
We have new f19/f20 images with openssl updated, and they appear to be
default/live already.
Were we waiting for some testing runs on them before announcing?
(Which we should have done before making them live, imho)
Or did that already happen?
Did we want to do a full test cycle o
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel <
clydekunkel7...@verizon.net> wrote:
> With all of the kernels in the rawhide 3.15 series so far the gnome
> desktop fails to load.
>
I'm wondering if this is hardware-specific, as I'm running an up to date
rawhide system with the 3.15 kernel on
On 16 Apr 2014 16:12, "Clyde E. Kunkel" wrote:
>
> With all of the kernels in the rawhide 3.15 series so far the gnome
> desktop fails to load. Kernels in the 3.14 series are fine.
>
> All I can see is that the X server seems to start (ps -A | grep Xorg
> returns a PID), but the Xorg.0.log is emp
Gnome with wayland is an option along with KDE et al..
On 04/16/2014 08:39 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 08:21:24 -0700
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
I tend to avoid the current Gnome, but was able to get a Gnome desktop
with Tuesday's Rawhide 3.15 rc1 with a bit of prodding.
On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 08:21:24 -0700
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> I tend to avoid the current Gnome, but was able to get a Gnome desktop
> with Tuesday's Rawhide 3.15 rc1 with a bit of prodding. I don't
> think Gnome works on wayland yet.
>
>
> > Any help appreciated.
> >
> > TIA
>
Wayland?
I tend to avoid the current Gnome, but was able to get a Gnome desktop
with Tuesday's Rawhide 3.15 rc1 with a bit of prodding. I don't think
Gnome works on wayland yet.
On 04/16/2014 08:11 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
With all of the kernels in the rawhide 3.15 series so far the gnome
desktop fa
With all of the kernels in the rawhide 3.15 series so far the gnome
desktop fails to load. Kernels in the 3.14 series are fine.
All I can see is that the X server seems to start (ps -A | grep Xorg
returns a PID), but the Xorg.0.log is empty. No obvious failures in
journalctl -xb. I see gdm is s
Shailendra,Welcome, I'm semi-new to Fedora, and totally new to this list,
therefore we have something in common. (I make many errors! Sometimes
intentially. Perhaps we differ in this regard :) Observation has guided me
while introducing myself to Fedora this past year. For instance, as an
obser
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
109
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-24018/varnish-3.0.5-1.fc20
55
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-2751/zabbix-2.0.11-2.fc20
14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-4691/
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
172
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19
109
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-24023/varnish-3.0.5-1.fc19
55
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FED
37 matches
Mail list logo
