On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 18:47 -0700, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
>> > According to the announcement, that version is vulnerable.
>> > Of the 1.01 versions, only 1.01g is saf(er).
>>
>
On Sun, 2014-04-06 at 21:27 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 04/06/14 21:18, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > just tried that, same symptoms but i also got the following selinux
> > diagnostic when i logged in with xfce:
> >
> > = start diagnostic =
> >
> > SELinux is preventing /usr/lib64/tumble
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 08 Apr 2014 20:48:16 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 21:39 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > On Wed, 09 Apr 2014 12:00:54 +1000
> > Ankur Sinha wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 17:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 08 Apr 2014 20:48:16 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 21:39 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > On Wed, 09 Apr 2014 12:00:54 +1000
> > Ankur Sinha wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 17:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 21:39 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Apr 2014 12:00:54 +1000
> Ankur Sinha wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 17:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > >
> > > The update has been available since yesterday afternoon. You have to
> > > restart your services after in
On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 12:00 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 17:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > The update has been available since yesterday afternoon. You have to
> > restart your services after installing it.
>
> So, I tried to update openssl as the announcement sugge
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 18:47 -0700, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> > According to the announcement, that version is vulnerable.
> > Of the 1.01 versions, only 1.01g is saf(er).
>
> RedHat backported the fix as the openssl in fedroda/rhel is
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 18:44 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> On 04/08/2014 06:36 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > yum -y install koji
> > > koji download-build --arch=x86_64 openssl-1.0.1e-37.fc20.1
> > > yum localinstall openssl-1.0.1e-37.fc20.1.x86_64.rpm
> According to the announcement, th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 09 Apr 2014 12:00:54 +1000
Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 17:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > The update has been available since yesterday afternoon. You have to
> > restart your services after installing it.
>
> So, I
On Ter, 2014-04-08 at 17:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 17:55 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> > I checked my server with an internet heartbleed test and the
> > result was positive. Heisenbug does not have the correct g version.
>
> http://fedoramagazine.org/statu
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 17:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> The update has been available since yesterday afternoon. You have to
> restart your services after installing it.
So, I tried to update openssl as the announcement suggested. I couldn't
do it via dnf:
http://paste.fedoraproject.org/92
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> According to the announcement, that version is vulnerable.
> Of the 1.01 versions, only 1.01g is saf(er).
RedHat backported the fix as the openssl in fedroda/rhel is carrying a
ton of patches.
I expect this is going to cause a lot of
On 04/08/2014 06:36 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
yum -y install koji
> koji download-build --arch=x86_64 openssl-1.0.1e-37.fc20.1
> yum localinstall openssl-1.0.1e-37.fc20.1.x86_64.rpm
According to the announcement, that version is vulnerable.
Of the 1.01 versions, only 1.01g is saf(er).
--
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 18:20 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> No sign of an update in yum yet - just checked.
Please grab the package directly from koji if it's urgent. It's
mentioned in the announcement Robyn made:
> For Fedora 19 x86_64:
> yum -y install koji
> koji download-build --arc
On 04/08/2014 05:57 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 17:55 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
I checked my server with an internet heartbleed test and the
result was positive. Heisenbug does not have the correct g version.
http://fedoramagazine.org/status-on-cve-2014-0160-aka
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
165
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19
101
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-24023/varnish-3.0.5-1.fc19
83
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FED
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 17:55 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> I checked my server with an internet heartbleed test and the
> result was positive. Heisenbug does not have the correct g version.
http://fedoramagazine.org/status-on-cve-2014-0160-aka-heartbleed/
The update has been available sin
I checked my server with an internet heartbleed test and the
result was positive. Heisenbug does not have the correct g version.
--
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com www.omen.com
Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications
Omen Technology Inc "The High Reliabil
==
#fedora-meeting: Fedora QA meeting
==
Meeting started by adamw at 15:00:34 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-04-07/fedora-qa.2014-04-07-15.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
---
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 16:32 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> thanks much to the releng team for their work on the dashboard!
whoops, looks like I duped Ralph's mail - ah, well :)
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
Hi folks! Just thought I'd mention this on list. There was some feedback
at the meeting on Monday that it was unnecessarily difficult to find out
how to actually install Rawhide from the documentation and pages
available. I've just finished a revamp of the Rawhide wiki page which
should make that i
On Tue, 8 Apr 2014 09:51:34 -0400
Ralph Bean wrote:
> In yesterday's meeting[1], the release engineering dashboard[2] was
> discussed. I fixed the issues that were raised and put out a new
> release:
>
> - There is now a loading indicator to show that data is being
> gathered.
> - The Live CD
On 08.04.2014 13:31, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 12:29 +0200, poma wrote:
>> No problemos.
>
> OT:
>
> Notwithstanding The Governator, "problemo" is not a Spanish word. The
> proper usage is "no hay problema". Note that problema is a masculine
> noun despite the apparently
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 16:18 +0530, Amita Sharma wrote:
> Welcome Anisha,
Hi Amita.
> I am planning to resume this project ::
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Welcome_SIG and we together can make it
> a success.
> If you are willing, we can meet and start planning things.
We do have the "Fedora J
... snip ...
On Mon, 7 Apr 2014, Ed Greshko wrote:
... snip regarding running a no-debug kernel ...
> yum reinstall kernel-modules-extra-3.15.0-0.rc0.git9.1.fc21.x86_64
> kernel-3.15.0-0.rc0.git9.1.fc21.x86_64
> kernel-headers-3.15.0-0.rc0.git9.1.fc21.x86_64
> kernel-devel-3.15.0-0.rc0.git9.1.f
On 04/08/2014 08:51 AM, Ralph Bean wrote:
In yesterday's meeting[1], the release engineering dashboard[2] was
discussed. I fixed the issues that were raised and put out a new
release:
- There is now a loading indicator to show that data is being
gathered.
- The Live CD and Appliance entrie
In yesterday's meeting[1], the release engineering dashboard[2] was
discussed. I fixed the issues that were raised and put out a new
release:
- There is now a loading indicator to show that data is being
gathered.
- The Live CD and Appliance entries now have links to directly
download the ima
2014-04-08 12:32 GMT+01:00 Patrick O'Callaghan :
> On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 11:08 +0100, Pedro Francisco wrote:
>> Software:
>> up-to-date Fedora 20.
>
> Unless you're using test versions, it would be better to ask on the
> Fedora Users list.
It's easier to get the devs here -- I don't believe many p
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 11:08 +0100, Pedro Francisco wrote:
> Software:
> up-to-date Fedora 20.
Unless you're using test versions, it would be better to ask on the
Fedora Users list.
poc
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 12:29 +0200, poma wrote:
> No problemos.
OT:
Notwithstanding The Governator, "problemo" is not a Spanish word. The
proper usage is "no hay problema". Note that problema is a masculine
noun despite the apparently feminine ending (because it's originally
from Greek before Lati
On 04/04/2014 09:18 PM, Anisha Narang wrote:
Hi,
I am a QA at work and a newbie to the fedora QA community. I have been
working with Red Hat, Pune for the past one year. I have majorly done
Web testing and written test automation scripts using different tools.
I have worked with Selenium(usin
On 08.04.2014 12:08, Pedro Francisco wrote:
> So, I've used HDMI for the first time this weekend.
>
> I have pressed Win+P a few times which resulted in a black screen
> (turned off, I guess).
> Suspending and resuming would turn on the internal monitor again (I
> had the session running so it was
2014-03-19 15:18 GMT+00:00 Adam Williamson :
> On Wed, 2014-03-19 at 14:49 +, Pedro Francisco wrote:
>> Hello!
>> I may in the past hit CTRL+C a few times during yum operation but
>> since I did a RPM database rebuild I was expecting it would not be the
>> cause of my issue.
>>
>> That being sa
So, I've used HDMI for the first time this weekend.
I have pressed Win+P a few times which resulted in a black screen
(turned off, I guess).
Suspending and resuming would turn on the internal monitor again (I
had the session running so it was easy).
But now, after a warm reboot, my GDM is a black
34 matches
Mail list logo
