The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
89
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-24018/varnish-3.0.5-1.fc20
70
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-0792/libinfinity-0.5.5-1.fc20
36
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
152
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19
89
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-24023/varnish-3.0.5-1.fc19
70
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FED
On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 19:50 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I need to read back over all the feedback this got when I first put it
> up, but for now, I looked back over the draft, and I think one small
> change is all it actually needs, but the implications change:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/w
On Mon, 2014-03-17 at 14:58 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > I can't recall whether I dropped this intentionally or inadvertently,
> > I'll try and check. But, of course, HW raid and BIOS RAID are really
> > rather different cases from software RAID.
>
> Mmm, well I'm not sure what the failure vect
On Mon, 2014-03-17 at 12:33 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Custom partitioning
> >
> > - encrypted_empty_auto vs encrypted_empty_manual; doesn't seem to test
> > a different code path because we don't have this inheritance of the
> > encrypted checkbox since Installation Options dialog is vanq
On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 17:18 +0100, Alexander Volovics wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:48:15AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 04:34:01PM +0100, Alexander Volovics wrote:
> > > But a lot of users are quite happy with 'fixed' solutions,
> > > especially on laptops, and
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:48:15AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 04:34:01PM +0100, Alexander Volovics wrote:
> > But a lot of users are quite happy with 'fixed' solutions,
> > especially on laptops, and might not like this unnecessary
> > complication. And do not like or n
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 04:34:01PM +0100, Alexander Volovics wrote:
> But a lot of users are quite happy with 'fixed' solutions,
> especially on laptops, and might not like this unnecessary
> complication. And do not like or need LVM.
Why do you care? (Not in a snarky way, but literally -- what is
On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 16:34 +0100, Alexander Volovics wrote:
> I have been following the discussions about the workstation
> part of Fedora.next and as anaconda installer was mentioned
> as the model of things to come I tried an install of Rawhide
> from a nightly build (this was not succesfull due
I have been following the discussions about the workstation
part of Fedora.next and as anaconda installer was mentioned
as the model of things to come I tried an install of Rawhide
from a nightly build (this was not succesfull due to kernel
errors, but that is not relevant here).
I do hope this ve
10 matches
Mail list logo
