On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 08:25 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 02/27/2014 08:08 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 07:10 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >> On 02/27/2014 06:43 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Feb 26, 2014, at 9:24 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> >>>
> sudo jour
On 02/27/2014 08:08 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 07:10 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 02/27/2014 06:43 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Feb 26, 2014, at 9:24 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
sudo journalctl --verify
all say 'PASS'
OK good news. It looks like some sort of throttling b
On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 07:10 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 02/27/2014 06:43 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >
> > On Feb 26, 2014, at 9:24 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> >
> >> sudo journalctl --verify
> >> all say 'PASS'
> >
> > OK good news. It looks like some sort of throttling by rsyslogd. I'm
> > vag
On 02/27/2014 06:43 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Feb 26, 2014, at 9:24 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
sudo journalctl --verify
all say 'PASS'
OK good news. It looks like some sort of throttling by rsyslogd. I'm vaguely
curious if it's some runaway/annoyed process is dumping a lot of message into
th
On Feb 26, 2014, at 10:09 AM, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:39:34AM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:27:56AM -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
>>> Searching through an output of journalctl when time was messed up
>>> turns out to be not that obvi
On Feb 26, 2014, at 9:24 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> sudo journalctl --verify
> all say 'PASS'
OK good news. It looks like some sort of throttling by rsyslogd. I'm vaguely
curious if it's some runaway/annoyed process is dumping a lot of message into
the journal, and whether the journal can keep
On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 16:39 -0700, Lawrence E Graves wrote:
> Is anyone aware of the fact that the apcupsd* packages have been in
> update-testing for about 4 weeks and the fact that is does not work. I
> have done a lot of searching to find out if there is a fix and there is
> none or should I
Is anyone aware of the fact that the apcupsd* packages have been in
update-testing for about 4 weeks and the fact that is does not work. I
have done a lot of searching to find out if there is a fix and there is
none or should I say I didn't find any fix. Am I missing something.
Please advise. I
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:39:34AM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:27:56AM -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> > Searching through an output of journalctl when time was messed up
> > turns out to be not that obvious and I may missed some clues.
>
> Ok, it looks like somet
Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Feb 25, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
>
>> Running on btrfs (hopefully that doesn't matter)
>
> If you haven't set xattr +C on /var/log/journal, then if you get a chance I'd
> be curious to see the results from:
>
> journalctl --verify
>
> btrfs scrub start
On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 09:07 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Except the kernel. Please exclude it from all of this.
Also: xorg-x11-server, xorg-x11-drv-*, libdrm, libpciaccess, mesa. Any
reasonable amount of testing on those is going to require more hardware
access than is feasible at rpmbuild time.
On 02/25/2014 11:25 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> What is virbro and what address should it get?
> Network Manager keeps trying to set it up but can't.
virbr0 (0, not o) is set up by libvirt, and used for guests that use NAT
connections. It is a known problem that NetworkManager and libvirt
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
123
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19
68
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-23592/rubygem-actionpack-3.2.13-3.fc19
60
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 12:54 +0200, Alexander Todorov wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>> I've started working to identify packages with missing upstream test suites
>> or
>> not running the tests in %check. Having a list of hundreds of packages now I
>>
On 02/26/2014 01:22 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/26/14 16:13, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
On 02/25/2014 10:37 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/26/14 14:25, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
What is virbro and what address should it get?
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html/Virtualization
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:27:56AM -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> Searching through an output of journalctl when time was messed up
> turns out to be not that obvious and I may missed some clues.
> Apparently the first backjump may have happened about the same time.
> Maybe. In any case these
On 02/26/14 16:13, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> On 02/25/2014 10:37 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 02/26/14 14:25, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
>>> What is virbro and what address should it get?
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html/Virtualization_Administration_Guide/chap-Virtualiz
On 02/25/2014 10:37 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/26/14 14:25, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
What is virbro and what address should it get?
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html/Virtualization_Administration_Guide/chap-Virtualization_Administration_Guide-Virtual_Networking.html
Th
18 matches
Mail list logo
