On Feb 25, 2014, at 9:54 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> Since I'm using xattr +C on /var/log/journal at the moment, the logs don't
> have Btrfs checksums, so I don't have an independent way to know if the logs
> are corrupt at a file system level or just internally.
journalctl --verify and Btrfs
On 02/26/14 14:25, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> What is virbro and what address should it get?
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html/Virtualization_Administration_Guide/chap-Virtualization_Administration_Guide-Virtual_Networking.html
--
Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions a
What is virbro and what address should it get?
Network Manager keeps trying to set it up but can't.
Otherwise Today's rsync installed an Xfce desktop
via the Heisenbug pxeboot.
For the first time in some weeks Rawhide is running
my Nvidia GRX 470 at full resolution. The Asmedia
USB ports are al
On Feb 25, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> Running on btrfs (hopefully that doesn't matter)
If you haven't set xattr +C on /var/log/journal, then if you get a chance I'd
be curious to see the results from:
journalctl --verify
btrfs scrub start -BR /
Depending on the size of the Btrf
On Feb 25, 2014, at 1:03 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
>>
>
> Here's what might be a big clue:
> Just after the hunk of prehistoric lines, when we get back to Feb, the 1st
> thing
> I see is:
>
> Feb 25 12:07:55 nbecker7 rsyslogd-2177: imjournal: begin to drop messages due
> to
> rate-limiting
>
On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 12:54 +0200, Alexander Todorov wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I've started working to identify packages with missing upstream test suites
> or
> not running the tests in %check. Having a list of hundreds of packages now I
> need to prioritize them somehow. This will help in later step
On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 18:06 -0800, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> For the last few days rawhide pxeboot installs have crashed
> with a script error java-1.7.0-openjdk
>
> Is there a way to bypass this file when installing rawhide
> with a reasonable desktop?
Don't include libreoffice. I think it'
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 01:34:36PM -0800, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> Today's rawhide install failed again with a
> script error java-1.7.0-openjdk
What is that error and what is in the script? Did you file bugzilla
report? What number? See also '--rpmverbosity' in 'man yum'.
You can see th
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 13:34:36 -0800,
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
Today's rawhide install failed again with a
script error java-1.7.0-openjdk
Can someone fix this or remove it from the install?
This issue is being tracked here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069224
--
t
Today's rawhide install failed again with a
script error java-1.7.0-openjdk
Can someone fix this or remove it from the install?
--
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com www.omen.com
Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications
Omen Technology Inc "The High Relia
Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Feb 25, 2014, at 11:45 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
>>
>> Don't know if it's related, but I just saw this:
>>
>> Feb 25 12:06:18 nbecker7 kernel: [ 59.015938] Ebtables v2.0 registered
>> Feb 25 12:06:18 nbecker7 kernel: [ 59.601221] ip6_tables: (C) 2000-2006
>> Netfilt
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 01:45:08PM -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
>
> Don't know if it's related, but I just saw this:
...
> Feb 25 12:06:18 nbecker7 kernel: [ 66.668588] virbr0: port 1(virbr0-nic)
> entered disabled state
> Feb 25 12:06:54 nbecker7 kernel: [ 109.855407] fuse init (API version 7.22
On 02/25/2014 01:44 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> OK, I think there is no question that time did not go back in
> /var/log/messages.
> Actually, the messages are scrambled.
>
> First it is Jan 25. Then it it Jan 8. We go through normal looking periods
> of
> Jan 9 and 10, and Jan 13 before we're
Neal Becker wrote:
> OK, I think there is no question that time did not go back in
> /var/log/messages. Actually, the messages are scrambled.
>
> First it is Jan 25. Then it it Jan 8. We go through normal looking periods
> of
> Jan 9 and 10, and Jan 13 before we're back on Feb 25. I don't thin
OK, I think there is no question that time did not go back in
/var/log/messages.
Actually, the messages are scrambled.
First it is Jan 25. Then it it Jan 8. We go through normal looking periods of
Jan 9 and 10, and Jan 13 before we're back on Feb 25. I don't think this can
be
explained by
On Feb 25, 2014, at 11:45 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
>
> Don't know if it's related, but I just saw this:
>
> Feb 25 12:06:18 nbecker7 kernel: [ 59.015938] Ebtables v2.0 registered
> Feb 25 12:06:18 nbecker7 kernel: [ 59.601221] ip6_tables: (C) 2000-2006
> Netfilter Core Team
> Feb 25 12:06:18
Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:12:49AM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 01:00:11PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> Are there any interesting messages in syslog near that jump? Both ntpd
>> and chronyd in their default configuration log a message wh
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:12:49AM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 01:00:11PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> Are there any interesting messages in syslog near that jump? Both ntpd
> and chronyd in their default configuration log a message when they
> step the clock, but ch
- Original Message -
>
>
> On 02/19/2014 02:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > There's some significant stuff in this week's FESCo minutes, so I
> > thought it wouldn't hurt to forward it to make people aware. Among the
> > key bits:
> >
> >
> > "AGREED: Open up F21 for ordinary Change pro
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:54:42 +0200, Alexander Todorov wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I've started working to identify packages with missing upstream test suites
You will need to have a clear idea about _what to test_ in a test-suite
(and how to implement it). Else it would be a waste of time to even think
- Original Message -
> From: "Aleksandar Kurtakov"
> To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 1:13:25 PM
> Subject: Re: How to calculate priority for missing tests or %check
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Alexander Todo
- Original Message -
> From: "Alexander Todorov"
> To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 12:54:42 PM
> Subject: How to calculate priority for missing tests or %check
>
> Hi guys,
> I've started working to identify packages with m
Hi guys,
I've started working to identify packages with missing upstream test suites or
not running the tests in %check. Having a list of hundreds of packages now I
need to prioritize them somehow. This will help in later steps when spec files
need to be fixed or somebody wants to start working
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 01:00:11PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Two different computers. One runs ntpd, the other chronyd. So it's probably
> not a hardware problem, and it's probably not a software bug in the client.
> Were they pointed at the same time server by any chance? I'm not sure how
>
24 matches
Mail list logo
