On Feb 19, 2014, at 6:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 16:55 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
>> If the bar is going to be raised,
>
> Just as a sidebar, I'm not sure you're entirely on track with this
> assessment - I haven't quite read the same 'undertone' into the .next
> d
On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 16:55 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> If the bar is going to be raised,
Just as a sidebar, I'm not sure you're entirely on track with this
assessment - I haven't quite read the same 'undertone' into the .next
discussions.
> then my instinct is to be even more aggressive with
I'm overdue on posting something to the anaconda (maybe devel also?) list
regarding installer testing, so this email is about flushing out some of the
issues before I do that, so that hopefully it's not quite so messy as it is in
my head right now and thus in this email.
So way back in January
> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:25:15 -0500
> Subject: Self Introduction
> From: elsamm...@gmail.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Wanted to quickly introduce myself. My name is Eric Sammons, I currently
> work at Red Hat and have since 2007. My career at Red Hat began
There's some significant stuff in this week's FESCo minutes, so I
thought it wouldn't hurt to forward it to make people aware. Among the
key bits:
"AGREED: FESCo wants Fedora to continue to have a core set of
features that all Products must implement. We'll defer decisions
about who decid
Hi,
Wanted to quickly introduce myself. My name is Eric Sammons, I
currently work at Red Hat and have since 2007. My career at Red Hat
began as a Technical Account Manager. A Little over two years ago I
joined the Quality Engineering team, first focusing on test automation
for Web UIs and more
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:13:08 -0800
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> Updated my office machine to 3.13 via yum update.
Hi Chuck,
Patrick has a point,
If posting a test,
full NVR would be easier to follow.
Was the test run on F19. F29, Rawhide.
Maybe a Sub. of like:
Fedora 20, kernel-3.14.0-0.rc2
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 10:22:36 +
"Patrick O'Callaghan" wrote:
> > kernel
>
> OK, obvious after the fact, but a Subject line of "3.13" is unlikely
> to be found by anyone searching the archives for kernel issues.
>
> poc
That's true,
___
Regards
Frank
frankly3d.com
--
test mailing list
te
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>> What is "3.13"? Enquiring minds want to know.
>>
>> poc
>
> kernel
OK, obvious after the fact, but a Subject line of "3.13" is unlikely
to be found by anyone searching the archives for kernel issues.
poc
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fe
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 10:12:14 +
"Patrick O'Callaghan" wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:13 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
> wrote:
> > Updated my office machine to 3.13 via yum update.
>
> What is "3.13"? Enquiring minds want to know.
>
> poc
kernel
___
Regards
Frank
frankly3d.com
--
test
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:13 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> Updated my office machine to 3.13 via yum update.
What is "3.13"? Enquiring minds want to know.
poc
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
This image http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6538874 is
working on my intel ivybridge setup and it completes a full installation
without any issue. Post install booting is bit slower to reach the lightdm
but eventually it reaches the graphical target within minutes.
I hope it help
12 matches
Mail list logo
