Fedora 18 updates-testing report

2013-12-26 Thread updates
The following Fedora 18 Security updates need testing: Age URL 33 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-21875/389-ds-base-1.3.0.9-1.fc18 19 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-22949/net-snmp-5.7.2-7.fc18 16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2

Fedora 19 updates-testing report

2013-12-26 Thread updates
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing: Age URL 69 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19262/quassel-0.9.1-1.fc19 62 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19 19 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FED

Fedora 20 updates-testing report

2013-12-26 Thread updates
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing: Age URL 70 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19198/quassel-0.9.1-1.fc20 33 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-22042/varnish-3.0.4-2.fc20 31 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-221

Re: F20 rescue kernel broken on kernel update

2013-12-26 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 21:03 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2013-12-25 at 15:28 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > > Once a 4th kernel is to be installed, yum starts removing old kernels. > > Perfectly normal. > > > > However, it removed the original kernel that was installed, which was > > 3.

Re: F20 rescue kernel broken on kernel update

2013-12-26 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2013-12-25 at 15:28 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > Once a 4th kernel is to be installed, yum starts removing old kernels. > Perfectly normal. > > However, it removed the original kernel that was installed, which was > 3.11.10-301.fc20.x86_64, and is also the one the rescue kernel is based

Re: Selinux out of control

2013-12-26 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 04:30 +0100, drago01 wrote: > On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 12:01 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > > Hi, > > > > 2013/12/25 Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX > >> > >> A few days ago SELinux was updated. > >> Selinux now ignores /etc/selinux/config > >> and issues denials. > > > > > > I have th

Re: Bug 1046701 – NetworkManager hides DNS resolver search list setting in Fedora 20

2013-12-26 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 11:26 -0500, Jonathan Kamens wrote: > Can somebody else confirm this, or tell me what I'm doing wrong? I'd > like to think I'm just imagining this problem since it's so absurd, > but I really can't find my way around it. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046701

Bug 1046701 – NetworkManager hides DNS resolver search list setting in Fedora 20

2013-12-26 Thread Jonathan Kamens
Can somebody else confirm this, or tell me what I'm doing wrong? I'd like to think I'm just imagining this problem since it's so absurd, but I really can't find my way around it. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046701 Bug text: "In Fedora 19 I was able to edit the list of domains

rawhide report: 20131226 changes

2013-12-26 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Thu Dec 26 05:15:07 UTC 2013 Broken deps for i386 -- [LuxRender] LuxRender-1.0-16.fc21.i686 requires libImath-2_0.so.10 LuxRender-1.0-16.fc21.i686 requires libIlmThread-2_0.so.10 LuxRender-1.0-16.fc2

Re: Something wrong with F20 updates-testing, clutter and Gnome?

2013-12-26 Thread Ville-Pekka Vainio
I should have searched Bugzilla as well. The problem is libevdev 0.6 which is being unpushed from updates-testing: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046426 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-23934/libevdev-0.6-1.fc20 -- Ville-Pekka Vainio -- test mailing list test@li

Something wrong with F20 updates-testing, clutter and Gnome?

2013-12-26 Thread Ville-Pekka Vainio
Hi all, I was running Fedora 20 with updates-testing enabled but started seeing problems with Gnome a few days ago. Gnome-shell failed to start with these error messages: gnome-session[1600]: /usr/bin/gnome-shell: symbol lookup error: /lib64/libclutter-1.0.so.0: undefined symbol: LIBEVDEV_READ_NO