The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
64
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19262/quassel-0.9.1-1.fc19
57
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19
14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FED
The following Fedora 18 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
28
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-21875/389-ds-base-1.3.0.9-1.fc18
14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-22949/net-snmp-5.7.2-7.fc18
11
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2
Well, I think travis can just be a supplemental part of %check, like
we can run it after package building, and paste its results as "for
reference only".
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Dec 21, 2013, at 6:59 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> I had a working UEFI Fedora 20 all on Btrfs 'infrastructure' (minimal install
> plus docs and a few additional services basically). Everything was up to date
> and working. I enabled updates-testing and did a yum update, a kernel update
> was
I had a working UEFI Fedora 20 all on Btrfs 'infrastructure' (minimal install
plus docs and a few additional services basically). Everything was up to date
and working. I enabled updates-testing and did a yum update, a kernel update
was not part of the update, rebooted and now I get dropped very
On 12/20/2013 11:58 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/20/2013 12:02 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
In the Installation Source dialog, the Updates option is checked and
greyed out. And even so, there is no place here to specify a url.
Should I be using Additional Repositories? BTW, I have local copies
On Sat, 2013-12-21 at 17:34 +1100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-12-21 at 17:06 +1100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > I'll dig up more logs and stuff and see what's causing it.
>
> It looks like a DRM issue
>
> It booted into runlevel3 just fine, which pointed to an X related error.
> This is what t
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 19:34 -0500, Richard Ryniker wrote:
>> >So strange as it may seem - it appears that it has to be shut for more than
>> >a short time to fail.
>>
>> Might it be a hibernation issue? After some period of time, perhaps your
>> machine wants to move fro
I now have 3.12 running on my server and a test computer.
Yum update on my office computer doesn't see it yet ?/?
So far no problems booting up.
What should we be looking for in 3.12?
--
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com www.omen.com
Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Ap
