The following Fedora 18 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
208
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-6117/eucalyptus-3.2.2-1.fc18
54
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17195/spice-gtk-0.18-3.fc18
51
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
47
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17836/davfs2-1.4.7-3.fc19
26
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19262/quassel-0.9.1-1.fc19
19
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-1999
On Wed, 2013-11-13 at 19:40 -0600, w clemmons wrote:
> Adam
>
>
> I used fedup get fedora 20 on these computers, I also added the
> nodebug repository to the haswell machine but there no 3.12 kernel
> updates currently as of writing this email.
There certainly are. Right now, the repo contains k
On Wed, 2013-11-13 at 23:46 +0100, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
> On 13.11.2013 22:34, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
> >> atlas.x86_64 3.8.4-8.fc19 @fedora
> > The package maintainer has not pushed any Fedora 20 updates. Please file
Adam
I used fedup get fedora 20 on these computers, I also added the nodebug
repository to the haswell machine but there no 3.12 kernel updates
currently as of writing this email. The libreoffice issue persisted into
fedora 20 and logitech mouse issue persisted as of fedora 20.
Thanks
warren
On
On 13.11.2013 22:34, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>> atlas.x86_64 3.8.4-8.fc19 @fedora
> The package maintainer has not pushed any Fedora 20 updates. Please file
> a bug against this package requesting an F20 update so that upgrades
# F20 Final Blocker Review meeting #1.5
# Date: 2013-11-14
# Time: 17:00 UTC (12:00 EST, 09:00 PST)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Despite the fact that we *just had* a Blocker Review Meeting, we get to
have another one tomorrow (2013-11-14) to finish the rest of the
propos
Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
atlas.x86_64 3.8.4-8.fc19 @fedora
The package maintainer has not pushed any Fedora 20 updates. Please file a bug
against this package requesting an F20 update so that upgrades work properly. I
see he has pushed a F19 update today
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 13:53:19 -0700
Mike Ruckman wrote:
> Below are the minutes from today's meeting. There were 20 proposed
> blockers when we started the meeting and we've narrowed that down to
> 4. We'll be having another Blocker Review meeting tomorrow
> (2013-11-13) to address the rest of the
Below are the minutes from today's meeting. There were 20 proposed
blockers when we started the meeting and we've narrowed that down to 4.
We'll be having another Blocker Review meeting tomorrow (2013-11-13) to
address the rest of the proposed blockers (I'll send out a separate
announcement to test
I have following two packages created for fc19 installed on my fc20
system (installed as deps?):
$ yum list installed | grep fc19
atlas.x86_64 3.8.4-8.fc19 @fedora
gstreamer-plugins-espeak.x86_640.4.0-2.fc19 @fedora
Are there any plans to
On 11/12/2013 08:24 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
HI
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 6:17 PM, nonamedotc wrote:
If that's true - it might be a tad inconvenient?
File a bug report against dnf noting the difference and you will get an
authoritative answer as to whether it is a bug or a intended design
Compose started at Wed Nov 13 08:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for i386
--
[OpenEXR_CTL]
OpenEXR_CTL-1.0.1-16.fc20.i686 requires libImath.so.6
OpenEXR_CTL-1.0.1-16.fc20.i686 requires libIlmThread.so.6
OpenEXR_CTL-1.0.1-16
Hi,
There is planned Power Management testday tomorrow (Thu). If you are
interested to see capabilities of your machine or measure power
consumption please join us, you will see what your HW know.
Everybody with various HW configuration welcomed (Old & New & Obscure &
virt guests)
info: http
14 matches
Mail list logo
